(Schwarz, et al., 2013, p. 1). IT is the most pervasive
factor in business, affecting every single process and
decision (Addy, 2007, p. 20). Therefore the discipline
of ITSM is applicable for nearly all business domains
relying on any kind of IT based service. Moreover, it
is necessary to control all IT components from a
holistic view, for constantly aligning the business
strategy with the IT strategy, especially when
environmental changes appear (vom Brocke, et al.,
2013, p. 1).
Nevertheless, complexity is considered as the
major challenge in ITSM. Complexity is referred to
the management of service data and its relations
(Benedettini and Neely, 2012, pp. 5,6).
Interdependencies and data flows between services
have to be determined easily and fast, so that possible
effects of changes and events can be recognized
ideally in real-time. Thus, efficient ITSM requires
transparency of service-to-customer, as well as
service-to-service interaction. Besides that,
transparency is necessary between services and its
underlying components, to ensure appropriate service
functionality. In the same way profound knowledge
of service relations is needed for defining and
fulfilling cost-efficient service levels and
consequently to ensure a particular Quality of Service
(QoS) level. Constantly changing requirements
necessitate QoS management techniques that are far
beyond static provisioning of network resources
(Kourtesis, et al., 2014, pp. 306,307). Higher
elasticity and dynamic provisioning is needed, based
on real-time decisions, reasoning and inference
(Kourtesis, et al., 2014, pp. 306,307).
Second, the maintenance and continuous
improvement of a service infrastructure, tightened
influenced by IT outsourcing and cloud-oriented
design, define a new level of complexity (Benedettini
and Neely, 2012, pp. 5,6). Changing requirements
often demand changing functionality, seamlessly
integrated in the working service environment.
Up to a certain level, IT services seem to be
manageable easily. With growing complexity,
however, a point will be reached where the effort of
complexity handling is higher than the services’
benefit, leading to crucial cost inefficiency (Josuttis,
2007, p. 2). Consequently, the service infrastructure
has to be designed and structured in a way that
supports effective management of both mentioned
complexity types on the one hand and enables
seamless integration of new services on the other
hand. The high level of complexity forces IT service
providers to think of new ways for automatically
managing a variety of data, variables and parameters,
necessary for the operation of services and its
resources (Kourtesis, et al., 2014, p. 308).
2 RELATED WORK
In the past years, different approaches have been
presented in the area of ITSM, all with the overall
goal to enhance efficiency, primary by using the
Semantic Web concept. They provide sophisticated
solutions with a precise goal for dealing with
complexity in IT Service Management.
It is beyond doubt that these solutions provide
value in the very specific field they are used, but the
question arising is, if they are adaptable to other
correlating areas as well at an adequate level of effort.
Referring back to the de-facto ITSM standard, the
Information Technology Infrastructure Library
(ITIL), IT Service Management is defined as the
discipline to deal with all processes in the service
lifecycle (van Bon, et al., 2007, pp. 24-26, 42).
Efficient ITSM needs a holistic view, accomplishing
a platform that allows making use of the Service
Oriented Architecture (SOA) and analytical benefits
in any ITSM domain. The ability of using semantic
knowledge must not be limited to one specific
implementation, but has to be realized on a shared
base. The semantic Wiki-based approach of Kleiner
et al. (Kleiner, et al., 2012) perfectly fits to the issue
of complexity in Incident and Problem Management
and thus, it is closely aligned to exactly these ITIL
processes. Although the semantic Wiki allows the
integration of other applications, the platform is still
limited to the information stored in the semantic
Wiki. Jantscher et al. (Jantscher, et al., 2014) focus on
reducing negative business impacts caused by wrong
incident prioritization. They developed an example
for analytical ITSM, the Incident Prioritizer, which is
an AHP decision support system for the prioritization
of incidents based on their business impact. For the
prioritization process, relevant incident data is
provided by an ontology, defining an ITIL-compliant
service catalogue. Valiente et al. (Valiente, et al.,
2012) deal with the service management problem of
integrating service management processes, which are
often specified in natural language. The paper aims to
translate ITSM relevant information, expressed in
natural language, to a computer understandable
format, by using semantic technologies. Thus, Onto-
ITIL is presented in this work, as an OWL based
ontology, tailored to be used in ITSM, to overcome
the gap between natural language process definitions
and IT services, or more generally the gap between
business and IT. Otherwise, the very generic
approach of Freitas et al. (Freitas, et al., 2008) defines
CLOSER2015-5thInternationalConferenceonCloudComputingandServicesScience
298