communications three scenarios can be considered,
“Parking on land”, “Takeoff and landing” and “Fly-
ing platform” (as in footnote 6). The evaluation of the
HAPs in these three scenarios is representative of its
general performance during operation.
The system is considered to work around a central
frequency ( f
0
) of 40 GHz. For “Parking on land” sce-
nario a velocity of 3 m/s was considered, for “Takeoff
and landing” scenario the velocity was of 15 m/s and
for the “Flying platform” scenarios a velocity of 30
m/s was used (as in footnote 6).
As channel model, a Wide Sense Stationary with
Uncorrelated Scattered (WSSUS) channel was con-
sidered. In order to estimate the maximum time delay
for multipath fading (τ
max
) the decision to consider
reflections inside a radius of 200 meters was made.
At 40 GHz the electromagnetic waves are atten-
uated by rain falls, but in this work this natural phe-
nomena is not considered. To have a raw idea of how
millimeter wave are attenuated with rain falls (ITU-R,
2005), (Barabino and Rodr´ıguez, 2013) and (El-Disi,
2010) can be consulted.
On Table 1 the simulation parameters used for
these three scenarios are shown.
Table 1: Simulation parameters.
Parameter Value
Carrier Frequency f
c
= 40 GHz
Bandwidth B = 16 MHz
Number of subcarriers N
FFT
= 128
Subcarrier spacing ∆f =
B
N
FFT
= 125 KHz
Symbol Duration T
s
= 8 µs
Guard interval T
G
=
T
s
8
= 1 µs
Symbol interval T
S+G
= T
s
+ T
G
= 9 µs
Number of paths P = 30
Number of clusters (groups of paths) N
c
= 1
Maximum time delay τ
max
= 0, 8895//0, 6313//0, 6067 µs
HAP velocity v = 3//15//30 m/s
Maximum Doppler shift f
Dmax
= f
0
·
v
c
≈ 400//2000//4000 Hz
using f
0
= f
c
Time Delay distribution b =
τ
max
ln(1000)
= 0, 1288//0, 0914//0, 0878 µs
3 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
As a transmission system, a DSTBC OFDM sys-
tem with 2 transmit antennas and 1 receive antenna
(2x1) is considered. It has been extensively proved
as an efficient and very robust system. Particularly
in this work the DSTBC class defined in (Rodr´ıguez
and Rohling, 2006) (“4A16PSK PCM2”) and exten-
sively analysed in (Rodr´ıguez and Rohling, 2007),
(Rodr´ıguez, 2007), (Rodr´ıguez, 2012) is evaluated
for HAPs applications. The description of 4A16PSK
PCM2 can also be read from Chapter 10 in (Jiang
et al., 2010).
4 RESULTS
To estimate the performance of 4A16PSK PCM2
technique for HAPs applications, three representative
scenarios were considered as it was previously ex-
plained. In this section the results obtained for each
scenario are discussed.
• PARKING ON LAND
The simulation parameters considered for this sce-
nario were: f
0
= 40 GHz, v = 3 m/s and τ
max
=
0,8895 µs.
In Fig. 1, the performance of 4A16PSK PCM2
technique is compared with conventional 64-PSK
modulation used in DSTBC. By comparing the aver-
age performance obtained for 4A16PSK PCM2 and
for 64-PSK a good advantage for the first one can
be observed. In particular for BER = 1x10
−1
an
improvement of 4,6 dB can be obtained by using
4A16PSK PCM2 instead of 64-PSK. These results
were compared without using any channel coding
technique in order to compare directly the perfor-
mance difference between these two techniques (the
proposed in (Rodr´ıguez and Rohling, 2006) and the
reference technique -conventional 64-PSK-). How
things change when channel coding is used is anal-
ysed in (Rodr´ıguez, 2007). There the reader can
see that the advantage for 4A16PSK PCM2 is main-
tained but a little bit diminished; how much can de-
pend on the channel coding technique considered, in
(Rodr´ıguez, 2007) convolutional coding and Viterbi
decoding was considered.
• TAKEOFF AND LANDING
At this scenario the simulation parameters were: f
0
=
40 GHz, v = 15 m/s and τ
max
= 0, 6313 µs.
In Fig. 2 an improvement of 10 dB can be ob-
tained for BER = 1x10
−1
. For this scenario the im-
provement is much higher than for the previous one.
The convenience of considering 4A16PSK PCM2 is
very clear. Further more, considering the simplicity
of this technique, this should be had in account for
these kind of applications.