2 ORGANIZATION AND
METHODS
Subjects. A group of 30 young cross-country skiers
(19 males and 11 females) 12-14 years old who had
1-3 years of training experience in skiing participated
in the study. The participants of the experiment had
14 hours of training a week.
Research Design. We assumed that there were
subjects with different morphofunctional state. To
divide them into different training groups with similar
morphofunctions, the initial measurement of athletes’
hemodynamics was taken in April, 2013. The current
research was carried out from April 2013 to May
2015 with several experimental tests including
athletes’ hemodynamics measurements and
incremental treadmill test (Table 1).
Incremental Test. The incremental test protocol was
not less than 5 stages jogging. It was held without a
preliminary warm-up on a treadmill (Technogym,
Italy) whose design allows adjusting the running
speed up to 25 km h
-1
. The initial speed was 4 km h
-1
.
The duration of each stage was 2 minutes. The speed
of the treadmill was increased by 2 km h
-1
for each
subsequent stage up to the last stage to exhaustion in
order to determine the maximal running speed. Heart
rate monitoring with Garmin Forerunner 305
(Garmin, USA) was used during the test and 5
minutes after it for recovery recording.
2.1 Heart Rate Monitoring during
Incremental Test
The running incremental test is one of the most
accessible and informative tests to assess physical
fitness in cyclical kinds of sport (cross-country
skiing, speed skating, cycling, track-and-field, etc).
The idea of the incremental test is to match the
changing athlete’s heart rate with the intensity (speed
or power) of physical load.
The heart rate monitoring was carried out with
Garmin Forerunner 305 for recording current HR
during the test and recovery. For rapid test results
processing an interval workout was created in
advance in Forerunner 305. The current values of HR,
the duration of interval stage were demonstrated on
the screen and saved in Forerunner 305 memory.
In an ideal athlete the “speed-heart rate” plot
yields a straight line. But in real athletes this curve
has a different form. The analysis of the peculiarities
of the graph “jogging speed ̶ HR” location and its
trajectory (figure 1) allows you determining:
- HR
4km h
-1
which is the athlete’s heart rate while
jogging at a speed equal to 4 km h
-1
, corresponds
to the athlete’s aerobic system development.
There is a heart rate plateau on the graph the value
of which is taken as the HR
4km h-1
indicator;
- the slope of the curve in the interval between the
speed of 4 km h
-1
and 6 km h
-1
indicates the cardio-
vascular system potential. The smaller the angular
inclination of a line drawn through the point HR
4
km h
-1
and HR
6 km h
-1
, the higher the heart potential
to deliver oxygen to muscles is. The extrapolation
of this line (when HR is within 90 and 120 beats
min
-1
) until the intersection with isoline HR = 190
beats/min shows the speed at which the athlete
could run if for achieving high running speed he
(she) used only their cardiovascular system
(without muscles recruitment). This allows
determining the potential capabilities of the heart
to deliver oxygen to muscles;
- running speed at a heart rate 170 beats min
-1
, km
h
-1
used as physical working capacity indicator
similar to PWC
170
(Belotserkovsky, 2005) or
PWC 170 – Cycle test, the primary purpose of the
which (Cambell et al., 2001) is to predict the
power output at a projected heart rate of 170 beats
per minute (bpm). For example, one athlete has 16
km h
-1
at the HR =170 bpm while the other has
only 13.5 km/h. The former is more physically fit
than the latter;
- jogging time with HR below 170 bpm
corresponds to the athlete’s aerobic fitness: the
longer an athlete has run with heart rate below 170
bpm the better is the current state of the athlete’s
aerobic system;
- time of physical work at HR above 180 bpm is
used as an indicator of the development of the
muscular system on cardiovascular system: the
longer the athlete is able to perform high intensity
workload the stronger is their muscular system;
Table 1: Experiment schedule design.
April July October January April
Incremental treadmill test * * *
Hemodynamic monitoring * * * * *
The training focus selection * * * * *