Encoding of Movement in Local Field Potentials from the Wall of
Motor Cortical Lesions in Rats
Ioana Nica
1
, Marjolijn Deprez
2
, Frederik Ceyssens
3
, Kris van Kuyck
2
, Robert Puers
3
, Bart Nuttin
2,4
and Jean-Marie Aerts
1
1
Division Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2
Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3
Division Microelectronics and Sensors (MICAS), Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
4
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
1 OBJECTIVES
The objective of the current study was to investigate
if electrical oscillatory activity from within the
cavity wall of a motor cortical lesion can be used as
a biomarker in decoding movement. We show
results from 3 rats with unilateral lesion in the
forelimb area of the motor cortex, for which local
field potential (LFP) spectra present significant
modulation within the frequency bands of 6-10 Hz
and 45-90 Hz, corresponding to movement episodes.
2 METHODS
Rats were anaesthetized with a mixture of ketamine
(Nimatek®) and medetomidine hydrochloride
(Narcostart®). A craniotomy over the forelimb area
of the primary motor cortex was made (coordinates:
1.5 mm posterior to 5 mm anterior to bregma, and
0.5 mm to 4.5 mm lateral to bregma), after which the
exposed brain tissue was aspirated to a depth of 1.5
mm. Three weeks later, a polyimide-based thin film
electrode array (Ceyssens et al., 2013) containing 16
platinum electrode contacts, each with a diameter of
350 µm (Fig. 1.a.) was implanted against the cavity
wall. The implant and connector (Omnetics) were
secured in place with stainless steel screws in the
skull and dental cement (Fig. 1.b.).
Open field tests were performed 1 month after
electrode implantation. The rats were placed in
metal cages (dimensions 36x38x35 cm), being free
to move. They were monitored for ~30 min with a
SONY HDR-AS15 camera (sample rate 30 Hz)
placed laterally. Brain electrical activity was
wirelessly recorded at the same time, using the W16
headstage model from Multichannel Systems (MCS
GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany), (see Fig.1.c.). The
LFPs were sampled at 10 kHz and preamplified in
the range of 1Hz to 5 kHz within the headstage.
a). b). c).
Figure 1: a). Electrode array; b). Top view of the
implantation site; c). View of the headstage.
Analyses of both video and LFP recordings were
performed offline in MATLAB (version 2014b; The
MathWorks). An automatic algorithm based on pixel
intensity was implemented to discriminate between
activity and resting intervals. The threshold was set
empirically so as to capture activity such as walking,
self-grooming, standing on hind limbs. Intervals
when no movement of the limbs could be detected
were labelled as part of the ‘resting state’. The
corresponding LFP intervals were then extracted and
divided in 2-sec epochs. On average, 225 (± 55)
epochs per rat were extracted for the active state and
335 (± 80) epochs, respectively, for the resting state.
The LFPs were low-pass filtered and down-
sampled using an equiripple FIR decimator (300 Hz
cutoff frequency, decimation factor of 10) so that
final sampling rate was 1 kHz. We computed the
power spectrum using the ‘periodogram’ Matlab
function (frequency resolution of 0.5 Hz) and we
multiplied power at each frequency bin with squared
frequency to account for the 1/f
2
decay specific to
brain signals (Miller et al., 2009; Buszaki et al.,
2012). A peak in power ~8 Hz and ~50 Hz was
observed on datasets from both behavioural states.