There is always a gap between the technical and
business side. Research data have often highlighted
that information systems do not talk the same
language as businesses. Despite the lack of a mutual
language and ontological understanding, it remains
important to involve both sides from the beginning.
The roles and activities will undergo continuous
change during the project steps.
A similar discussion can be found in the literature
regarding business professionals facing difficulties in
discussing software-related details that are not
directly linked with everyday work. In addition,
discussions related to information systems could miss
several key terms and ‘displays’, which can engage
business professionals and should be discussed before
dealing with technical details.
4 CONCLUSION
The study marked at identifying more efficient ways
of tax control in the domain of recapitulative
statements data integration. Information systems and
tools were distributed and a lot of manual work was
conducted to control recapitulative statements data.
The results indicate that it is important to evaluate
the integration project. The need for integration was
obvious, but a deeper understanding was needed with
an in-depth analysis of the development project.
It also offered implications for tax administrators
regarding the effectiveness of similar projects and the
importance of cooperation communication. A more
effectively run project can reduce costs and help
devise better ways to define control procedures.
The created model for the above-mentioned
research and development steps and concluded
mechanisms are presented in Table 1 and can help
future works on a similar type of integration. Based
on the evidence, the most important issue is the
overall understanding of the operational field, that is,
domain ontology. A challenging point is the
difference between business units and related
approaches, in this case, toward data. This challenge
can be tackled with strong cooperation and
collaborative activities. This needs flexibility,
resilience, listening abilities and perception of wider
entities than one’s own business unit.
In conclusion, the need for integration was
obvious. Although the implementation method was
not entirely clear, it was concluded and successful.
The integration affected the existing ways of working
and suggested new ones for tax control across
national borders.
From a researcher’s viewpoint, some mistakes
made during the project have helped find direction in
modelling design work. When data were collected
and triangulated from various sources, such
causalities can be dealt with. A review of the entire
data revealed the exact points at which mistakes were
made. It is noteworthy that this study exposed certain
challenges in this type of work, which otherwise
would have remained unnoticed.
How can these problems be avoided? The easiest
way is to improve participants’ overall understanding
of the control area, or pre-operational validation.
However, this may be a rather simplified answer
given that the field comprises different businesses,
information systems, operative developers and actors
as well as varying levels of digitalisation. Thus,
cooperation seems to be the most vital aspect,
particularly when there are several parties, a point
highlighted by every interviewee.
The challenges are not restricted to activities in
the research and development project. In fact, the
organisational environment and existing
circumstances can also affect the background agency.
These larger observations are difficult to analyse
and there exist certain factor that could affect this
project and the integration, for example, lack of
resources. Limited resources can affect challenges to
organisational capability.
This study emphasises the significance of
cooperation and higher participant commitment to
understand the facts and learn from experiences of
other businesses, which is parallel to a deeper
understanding of one’s own business. The study
found that cooperation, commitment and trust can
affect every step in the project and the lifecycle of the
development work.
Different organisational units not only collaborate
with each other to share knowledge, but also compete
with each other to maximise their own benefits.
Internally, they vie for the organisation’s limited
resources. Consequently, they try to outperform other
units that offer similar products or services in the
market place. Thus, it is reasonable to expect that the
effectiveness of coordination mechanisms for
knowledge sharing depends on the conditions of
competition among organisational units.
As mentioned earlier, this study project is not only
about techniques and processes but also cooperation
and trust building as well as choices to be evaluated
and decisions to be made.
The study offers suggestions for future works. The
regulation includes many international and domestic
anti-tax fraud motives, such as the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)