• Qualitative indicators: time of the aiming point
location in 10.0 zone, %; the shot hole group
diameter, mm - the distance between the centers
of the outermost holes; “aiming point speed
graph” before a shot, of the current shot and at
the shooting stage (speed, mm/sec);
“Coordination” graph.
In our opinion, the SCATT shooting system is the
most relevant one for the comparative “shooting
technique-result” analysis. Especially effective is the
current analysis of the aiming point line displayed
on the computer monitor.
The analysis of “Coordination” graphs (Figure 3)
allows exploring the deviation of the aiming point
from the centre of the target in the final phase of the
shot (pulled trigger) during shooting training
sessions. The dynamics of this aiming line are
individual, like handwriting, with mistakes and
specific features, but there are certain patterns
(Figure 3).
Figure 3: “Coordination” graphs of the elite shooter (line
1) and the elite biathlete (line 2) in a standing position.
The analysis of the “Coordination” graph of a
highly-skilled shooter (Figure 3, line 1) revealed that
A
1
B
1
C
1
-line named ‘a shot follow-through’ is nearly
straight and almost horizontal. Segment B
1
C
1
is a
short-term retention of concentration during 0,1 sec
just after the shot.
The “Coordination” graph (Figure 3, line 2) is an
elite biathlete’s aiming trajectory. It demonstrates
that from the moment of the shot decision (point A
2
)
to the shot itself (point B
2
) there is a loss of 0,4 ±
0,1 points during 0,3 sec.
The segment B
2
C
2
‘aiming line retention after the
shot’ is deliberately increased to 0.3 sec., because
relatively long concentration retention is necessary,
in our opinion, for the biathlon shooting round. Such
aiming line fixation immediately after shooting is
justified in the specific conditions of biathlon, that
is, high heart rate intensity zones, increased tremor,
striving to minimize the time an athlete spends at the
shooting range, and it also contributes to aligning the
rhythm and reliability of the shooting session.
A biathlete is inferior to an elite rifle-shooter in
the shooting performance, however, it should be
noted that the diameter of the biathlon shooting
target for standing shooting is 115 mm, which
allows biathletes not to aim at scoring "tens" (the
very centre of the target) only (it is enough to hit
within the edge of the target to score 4.5 points).
The score lost from the conventional decision-
making point (A
1
) to the shooting moment (B
1
) of an
elite shooter is low (0,4 ± 0,25 points), whereas for
biathletes it is about 0,75 ± 0,25 points.
3 ORGANIZATION AND
METHODS
Subjects. A group of 12 well-trained young
biathletes (6 males and 6 females), 14-19 years old,
with 3-5 years of training experience in skiing and
biathlon were recruited as participants. Subjects №
1,2,3 (Table 2) had no experience in shooting,
Subjects № 4-12 (Table 2) had 2-5 years of sport
experience in biathlon. The participants’ training
load was about 30 hours per week including the
usual means of biathlon training in preparatory
period: roller skiing, nordic walking and cross-
country running, shooting on a shooting range,
power training and the SCATT simulator shooting.
Research Design. The current research was carried
out during 3 weeks in August 2012 with SCATT-
simulator shooting. Every athlete had 0.5 hours of
SCATT-shooting 3 times per week. Each athlete’s
standing shooting parameters were measured on the
1
st
, 10
th
, 18
th
and 21
st
days of our experiment.
At the start of the first shooting training session
with SCATT simulator our subjects were informed
about the shooting cycle algorithm and the indicators
of SCATT shooting which were important to
monitor (graph “Coordination”).
We assumed that a number of rifle shooting
mistakes seen on “Coordination” graph in the
shooting simulator SCATT may be easily corrected
or avoided. But to enhance biathlon shooting