guidelines provide a scientific basis for assessing
the environmental audit risk. This situation restricts
the work environment of audit risk which is
increased to the height of building a harmonious
lodge, and also restricting the deepening of
environmental audit work.
2.2 Performance Evaluation
Mechanism Is Not Perfect
In the absence of profound understanding of the
essence of the context of "building
environment-friendly lodge" concept, some
policymakers feel "develop first, clean up later" or
"just development, not governance" of luck. More
seriously, the risk of these decision-makers
indifferent to face environmental audits, but only
one-sided pursuits of short-term economic benefits,
leading to normal environmental audits. Due to
environmental audit risk and potential complexity
of features, auditors manage hazards generally
focus on there is a pattern of risk, but not
particularly concerned about the potential risks,
which would lead to deviation management will
eventually affect the quality of environmental
auditing. In addition, since under the framework of
the voluntary disclosure of environmental
accounting information, some agencies will be
completely in accordance with their own needs and
habits of different forms of disclosure, resulting in
environmental protection information presented not
only in the face of external users on the
comparability relatively scarce, and in also not very
good on the guarantee usefulness. This phenomenon
leads to a great relationship with the assessment
mechanism leading sector, environmental protection
and environmental audit risk lack of attention in the
work of the existing performance appraisal system,
resulting in the severe environmental situation and
economic sustainable development of
contradictions.
2.3 Inadequate Auditing Methods and
Techniques
Due to the time of proposing environmental audits
is not long, used in practice more financial audits,
audits necessary knowledge engineering, and
environmental auditing relative lack of expertise
and tools, resulting in some of the distance still to
achieve fully operational environment audit
requirements. China's current environmental audit
work is the main line of special funds for
environmental protection, based on the financial
audit report of the audit, the audit basic ideas and
audit methods used or the auditing. Environmental
benefits combined audit qualitative and quantitative
analysis, problem-oriented analysis, and other
aspects of a variety of methods to track extends not
fully covered, resulting in actual audit cannot
guarantee the quality of the audit report, to eventual
risks. Lack of technical resources and complex
environmental auditing personnel, information
technology and analytical tools needed for the
actual audit work is also lacking, thereby blocking
the normal conduct environmental audits, increasing
the risk of environmental auditing. In addition,
because, after all, is the emerging field of
environmental auditing audit, financial,
environmental, engineering and other related
content is covered, auditing also takes a certain
complexity, which requires professional
competence environmental auditor must have. But
in the current environment and conditions of audit
experience, audit staff to enforce the practice on
accurate judgment and strong analytical skills, there
are still some distances to go.
2.4 Lack of System and Authority
The regime under environmental law due to the
intangible nature of the ecological environment and
non-quantifiable benefits and are not properly
Our Country Environment Audit Risk Research
49