How Do Students ‘Really’ Interact with Virtual Worlds? - The Influence of Proper Induction for Virtual Interactions

Athanasios Christopoulos, Marc Conrad, Mitul Shukla

2016

Abstract

Our ongoing research focuses on the ways that interactions affect learner engagement with a virtual world and, consequently, the educational activities that take place within it when a hybrid learning approach is used. It aims to form a complete taxonomy of the types of interactions that can lead to the development of engaging and interactive learning experiences. In this paper, we examine the impact that the orientation (induction) process has on learner engagement by observing a cohort of postgraduate students while using an OpenSim-based institutionally hosted virtual world. The results of our study highlight that educators and instructors need to plan their in-world learning activities very carefully and with a focus on interactions if engaging activities are what they want to offer their students. Additionally, it seems that student interactions with the content of the virtual world and the in-class student-to-student interactions have stronger impact on student engagement when hybrid methods are used. We confirm and further enhance our hypothesis investigating student feelings and thoughts about the interaction taking place within a virtual world when that is used in higher education.

References

  1. Allison, C., Campbell, A., Davies, C. J., et al. (2012) “Growing the use of Virtual Worlds in education: an OpenSim perspective”. In Gardner, M., Garnier, F., and Kloos, C. D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (EiED 7812), pp. 1-13, Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Paris, France.
  2. Anasol, P. R., Callaghan, V., Gardner, M., and Alhaddad, M. J. (2012) “End-user programming and deconstrutionalism for co-creative laboratory activities in a collaborative mixed-reality environment”. In Gardner, M., Garnier, F., and Kloos, C. D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (EiED 7812), pp. 171-182, Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  3. Bredl, K., Groß, A., Hünniger, J., and Fleischer, J. (2012) “The avatar as a knowledge worker? How immersive 3D virtual environments may foster knowledge acquisition”. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15-25.
  4. Camilleri, V., de Freitas, S., Montebello, M., and McDonagh-Smith, P. (2013) “A case study inside virtual worlds: use of analytics for immersive spaces”. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 7813), pp. 230-234, Leuven, Belgium.
  5. Carter, B. (2012) “Virtual harlem: an innovative past, an evolving present and an exciting future”. In Gardner, M., Garnier, F., and Kloos, C. D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (EiED 7812), pp. 1-13, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática, Paris, France.
  6. Chafer, J. and Childs, M. (2008) “The impact of the characteristics of a virtual environment on performance: concepts, constraints and complications”. In Proceedings of the Researching Learning in Virtual Environments (ReLIVE 7808), pp. 94-105, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
  7. Childs, M. (2010). Learners' experience of presence in virtual worlds. Ph.D thesis. University of Warwick.
  8. Childs, M., and Peachey, A. (Eds). “Understanding Learning in Virtual Worlds”. Human-Computer Interaction Series, pp. 1-20, Springer, London: UK.
  9. Christopulos, A., Conrad, M. (2012) “Views of Educators on Immersion in Virtual Worlds from Second Life to OpenSim”. In Gardner, M., Garnier, F., and Kloos, C. D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (EiED 7812), pp. 48-59, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática, Paris, France.
  10. Christopoulos, A., & Conrad, M. (2013) “Maintaining context in a Changing (Virtual) World: Educators' Perspectives for OpenSim and Second Life”. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU'13). Aachen, Germany.
  11. Christopoulos, A., Conrad, M., and Shukla, M. (2014) “Objects, Worlds, and Students: Virtual Interaction in Education”. Education Research International, vol. 2014, 20 pages, doi:10.1155/2014/318317.
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2011) Research Methods in Education, Routledge Taylor & Francis, 7th edition, London: UK.
  13. Conrad, M., Neale, J., and Charles, A. (2010) “Of mice or men? The avatar in the virtualscape”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Society (i-society 7810), pp. 242-247, London, UK.
  14. Dalgarno, B., and Lee, M. J.W. (2010) “What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?”. The British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 10-32.
  15. de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., and Poulovassilis, A. (2009) “Developing an evaluation methodology for immersive learning experiences in a virtual world”. In Proceedings of the Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES 7809), pp.43-50, Coventry, UK.
  16. de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., and Poulovassilis, A. (2010) “Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world”. The British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 69-85.
  17. Dede, C. (1995) “The evolution of constructivist learning environments: immersion in distributed virtual worlds”. Educational Technology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 46-52.
  18. Dickey, M. D. (2005) “Brave new (interactive) worlds: a review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments”. Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 121-137.
  19. Elliott, J. B., Gardner, M., and Alrashidi, M. (2012) “Towards a framework for the design of mixed reality immersive education spaces”. In Gardner, M., Garnier, F., and Kloos, C. D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (EiED 7812), pp. 63-76, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática, Paris, France.
  20. Frutos-Perez, M. (2011) “Practice, context, dialogue: using automated conversational agents to extend the reach and depth of learning activities in immersive worlds”. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 70-77, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.
  21. Herbet, A., Thompson, F., and Garnier, F. (2012) “Immaterial art stock: preserve, document and disseminate the pioneering works of art created inside online immersive platforms”. In Gardner, M., Garnier, F., and Kloos, C. D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (EiED 7812), pp. 101-113, Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Paris, France.
  22. Hockey, A., Esmail, F., Jimenez-Bescos, C., and Freer, P. (2010) “Built environment education in the era of virtual learning”. In Proceedings of the W089 Special Track - 18th CIB World Building Congress, pp. 200- 217, Salford, UK.
  23. Johnson, C. M., Vorderstrasse, A. A., and Shaw, R. (2009) “Virtual worlds in health care higher education”. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3-12.
  24. Jones, D. (2013) “An alternative (to) reality”. In Proceedings of the Researching Learning in Virtual Environments (ReLIVE 7808), pp. 113-121, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
  25. Levesque, J., and Lelievre, E. (2011) “Creation and communication in virtual worlds: experimentations with OpenSim. In Richir, S. and Shirai, A. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference (VRIC 7811), pp. 22-24, Laval, France.
  26. Minocha S., and Tingle, R. (2008) “Socialisation and collaborative learning of distance learners in 3D virtual worlds”. In Proceedings of the Researching Learning in Virtual Environments International Conference (RELIVE 7808), pp. 216-227, Milton Keynes, UK.
  27. Padrós, A., Romero, M., and Usart, M. (2012) “Measuring the knowledge convergence process in the collaborative game metavals”. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 15, pp. 193-202.
  28. Schrader, P. G. (2008) “Learning in technology: reconceptualizing immersive environments”. Association for the Advancement of Computing In Education Journal, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 457-475.
  29. Shukla, M., Conrad, M. (2011) “Second Life is not an Island”. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on e-Society, Avila, Spain.
  30. Steuer, J. (1992) “Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence”. Journal of Communication, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 73-93.
  31. Veletsianos, G. (2009) “The impact and implications of virtual character expressiveness on learning and agentlearner interactions”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 345-357.
  32. Vosinakis, S., Anastassakis G., and Koutsabasis, P. (2014) “A Platform for Teaching Logic Programming using Virtual Worlds”, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT'14.
  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA.
  34. Zhao, H., Sun, B., Wu, H., and Hu, X. (2010) “Study on building a 3D interactive virtual learning environment based on OpenSim platform”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing (ICALIP 7810), pp. 1407-1411, Shanghai: China.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Christopoulos A., Conrad M. and Shukla M. (2016). How Do Students ‘Really’ Interact with Virtual Worlds? - The Influence of Proper Induction for Virtual Interactions . In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-179-3, pages 43-54. DOI: 10.5220/0005755700430054


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu16,
author={Athanasios Christopoulos and Marc Conrad and Mitul Shukla},
title={How Do Students ‘Really’ Interact with Virtual Worlds? - The Influence of Proper Induction for Virtual Interactions},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2016},
pages={43-54},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005755700430054},
isbn={978-989-758-179-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - How Do Students ‘Really’ Interact with Virtual Worlds? - The Influence of Proper Induction for Virtual Interactions
SN - 978-989-758-179-3
AU - Christopoulos A.
AU - Conrad M.
AU - Shukla M.
PY - 2016
SP - 43
EP - 54
DO - 10.5220/0005755700430054