Figure 2: Rate of “Pharmacy” incident occurrence.
Figure 3: Rate of “Tube” incident occurrence.
Table 9: Nurse pairs who did not work together on day and
night shifts during five years.
Type of
shift
Number
of pairs
Number of pairs between the nurses
with ladder level lower than 2
day 117 58
night 34 26
both 24 18
4.2 Extraction of Nurse Pairs Who Did
Not Work Together on Day and
Night Shifts during Five Years
Table 9 shows the results. We gave a breakdown of
the pair between the nurses with ladder level lower
than 2 because the extracted pairs had high
probabilities of causing incidents. We made a roster
devoting attention to these pairs.
5 CONCLUSIONS
As described herein, we sought knowledge to support
production of a nurse roster by analyzing nurse
scheduling data and incident reports from night-work
provided by A General Hospital from a team
viewpoint, reflecting a nurse working style.
Accordingly, we conducted three experiments as
follows from the viewpoint of a team.
Extraction of shift patterns that all nurses meet
working throughout a year
Correlation of incidents and nurse groups on the
night shift
Extraction of nurse pairs with no mutual work on
day and night shifts during five years
In shift pattern extraction, a limitation condition in
roster making and a possible shift pattern were
extracted. The maximum length in each year was
explained using a combination of shift patterns of
length 3. The real incident rate was judged from
viewing 2 in a case of working in the dangerous nurse
group, which was more likely to produce incidents.
Although the rate of the dangerous group was slightly
high, no significant difference was found. Pairs who
did not take day and night duty together during five
years were extracted.
Future studies should examine techniques to
identify shift patterns that are most appropriate as
constraints to roster making by analyzing extracted
shift patterns and correlations with incidents.
REFERENCES
Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., Petersen, L. A.,
Small, S. D., Servi, D., Laffel, G., Sweitzer, B. J., Shea,
B. F., Hallisey, R., Vliet, M. V., Nemeskal, R. & Leape,
L. L. 1995. Incidence of adverse drug events and
potential adverse drug events: Implications for
prevention. The Journal of the American Medical
Association, 274, 29-34.
Burke, E. K., Causmaecker, P. D., Berghe, G. V. &
Landeghem, H. V. 2004. The state of the art of nurse
rostering. Journal of Scheduling, 7, 441-499.
Dowsland, K. A. 1998. Nurse scheduling with tabu search
and strategic oscillation. European Journal of
Operational Research, 106, 393-407.
Ikegami, A. 2005 Nurse Scheduling - Site research,
Modeling and Algorithms -. Proceedings of the
Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53, 231-259.
Ikegami, A., Aizawa, M., Ohkura, M., Wakasa, K.,
Matsudaira, N. & Kosugo, R. 1995. A preliminary study
of the development of a scheduling system for hospital
nurses. Journal of Science of Labour, 71, 413-423.
Ikegami, A., Tanaka, Y. 2014. Re-challenge to the nurse
scheduling problem (in Japanese). The operations
research as a management science, 59, 26-33.
Millar, H. H., Kiragu, M. 1998. Cyclic and noncyclic
scheduling of 12 h shift nurses by network
programming. European Journal of Operational