0246810
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Peak wavelength shift [nm]
Strain [mε]
Waist diameter [μm]
30
20
10
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Waist diameter [μm]
30
20
10
Peak wavelength shift [nm]
Temperature [
ο
C]
1.314 1.316 1.318 1.320
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Waist diameter [μm]
30
20
10
Peak wavelength shift [nm]
Ambient index [A.U.]
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3: Peak wavelength shifts of the tapered MCFs with various waist diameters as functions of strain (a), temperature
(b), and ambient index (c), respectively.
respectively. The peak wavelength of the tapered
MCF was shifted to longer wavelength as
temperature increased. The reduction of the waist
diameter of the tapered MCF degraded its
temperature sensitivity (14.2 pm/
o
C for 30 μm, 7.9
pm/
o
C for 20 μm, and 3.8 pm/
o
C for 10 μm) as seen
in Fig. 3(b). In Fig. 3(c), the peak wavelength of the
tapered MCF shifted to longer wavelength as the
ambient index was increased. The ambient index
sensitivity of the tapered MCF should be improved
by reducing the waist diameter of the tapered MCF.
The ambient index sensitivities of the tapered MCF
with waist diameters of 30, 20, 10 mm were
measured to be 358.6, 542.7, 809.6 nm/RIU,
respectively.
3 CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we discussed transmission
characteristics of an in-line modal coupler based on
the adiabatically tapered MCF with variations in
strain, temperature, and ambient index. By
controlling the waist diameters, we investigated the
sensitivity variation of the adiabatically tapered
MCF to strain, temperature, and ambient index
changes. The reduction of the waist diameter
improved the coupling strength among the multiple
core modes in the in-line modal coupler because of
the variation of the evanescent field and the pitch
size. The modal coupling of the in-line modal
coupler apparently generated the transmission
oscillation of the center core and the multiple side
core modes depending on the waist diameter. The
extinction ratio of the transmission oscillation was
gradually improved by diminishing the waist
diameter to be ~30 μm because of the enhancement
of the coupling strength among the multiple core
modes. The further reduction of the waist diameter
degraded the transmission oscillation of the in-line
modal coupler because of the sinusoidal dependence
of the normalized intensities of the center core and
multiple side core modes on the coupling coefficient
and the propagation distance. The reduction of the
waist diameter of the adiabatically tapered MCF
could dramatically change its sensitivities to strain,
temperature, and ambient index. We believe that
experimental results are very useful to fabricate the
in-line modal coupler based on the MCF and to
improve the performance of the fiber-optic sensors
by controlling the waist diameter of the adiabatically
tapered MCF.
REFERENCES
M. Koshiba, K. Saitoh, and Y. Kokubun, “Heterogeneous
Multi-Core Fibers: Proposal and Design Principle,”
Electron. Exp., 6, 98-103 (2009).
L. Li, A. Schülzgen, H. Li, V. L. Temyanko, J. V.
Moloney, and N. Peyghambarian, “Phase-Locked
Multicore All-Fiber Lasers: Modeling and
Experimental Investigation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 24,
1721-1728 (2007).
B. Zhu, T. F. Taunay, M. F. Yan, J. M. Fini, M. Fishteyn,
E. M. Monberg, and F. V. Dimarcello, “Seven-Core
Multicore Fiber Transmissions for Passive Optical
Network,” Opt. Exp., 18, 1117-11122 (2010).
G. M. H. Flockhart, W. N. Macpherson, J. S. Barton, and
J. D. C. Jones, “Two-Axis Bend Measurement with
Bragg Gratings in Multicore Optical Fiber,” Opt. Lett.,
28, 387-389 (2003).
A. V. Newkirk, E. Antonio-Lopez, G. Salceda-Delgado, R.
Amezcua-Correa, and a. Schülzgen, “Optimization of
Multicore Fiber for High-Temperature Sensing,” Opt.
Lett., 39, 4812-4815 (2014).
S. Zheng, G. Ren, Z. Lin, and S. Jian, “Mode-Coupling
Analysis and Trench Design for Large-Mode-Area
Low-Cross-Talk Multicore Fiber,” Appl. Opt. 52,
4541-4548 (2013).
M. S. Yoon, H. J. Kim, G. Brambilla, and Y. G. Han,
“Development of a Small-Size Embedded Optical