ways. Next, it is between 71166 M€ and 71171 M€
in motorways. On the other hand, overall emergency
costs are between 6663.55 M€ and 6658.86 M€ in
all hands. (T€=10^3 €, M€= 10^6 €)
As a conclusion, Italy can choose the next
generation architecture with the sequence below:
(i)The best option: Type-2 Model-5.2; (ii) 2
nd
Option: Type-2 Model-4.2; (iii) 3
rd
Option: Type-2
Model-6; (iv) 4
th
Option: Type-2 Model-5.1; (v) 5
th
Option: Type-2 Model-4.1 (vi) Worst- option of
these optimal six architectures: Type-2 Model-3.
4 CONCLUSION & FUTURE
WORKS
This paper advises the optimal solution of next
generation architecture for “Emergency Calls EROs
Handling” Model. Its architecture selection is
described in Part-2.3 in Figure-3 and cost model
simulation results are explained in Figure-7. Its
optimal solution is Type-2 Model-5.2 in Italy after
ecall equipped vehicle regulations in 2018.
Future work can describe the next generation
eCall system architectures of other EU-Countries to
give an advice for the optimal architecture selection.
Future work can make deep-dive on the response
and dispatch types with the simulation of call-taker
and dispatcher behaviour. This type of study enables
to see the time and life saving rates in details.
REFERENCES
OECD, 2014, “IRTAD Road Safety Annual Report,
2014”, pp.-13-15; pp.-281-290
ERTICO, 2014, “Harmonised Ecall European Pilot Final
Report 1”, HeERO Project, pp-29-30.
REA Agency, 2015, ‘Policy for Travel Expenses’,
European Commission Research Directorate General
pp.2
‘EENA Standarts’, http://www.eena.org/pages/ng-
112#.VoI47-iLTIU accessed 29 December 2015
L. R. Kimball, 2011, “Next Generation 9-1-1 Cost
Analyses”, State of Oregon Office of Emergency
Management, pp-20-28.
Johannes Abele, Christiane Kerlen, Sven Krueger, 2005,
“Exploratory Study on the potential socio-economic
impact of the introduction of Intelligent Safety
Systems in Road Vehicles” VDI,VDE,IT-IfV Köln,
pp-25, 69.
D. P. Bowyer, R. Akçelik, D. C. Biggs, 1985, ARRB
Transport Research Ltd. “Guide to Fuel Consumption
Analysis for Urban Traffic Management”, pp.28-30.
‘Continental, Worldwide Emission Standarts and Related
Regulations March 2015 Passener Cars, Ligth and
Mediun
DutyVehicles’http://www.contionline.com/www/downloa
d/automotive_de_en/general/contact_services/downloa
ds/commercial_vehicles/powertrain/common/pow_emi
ssion_booklet_pdf_en.pdf accessed 28 December
2015
ACEA, 2004, “New PC registrations by country,
Historical series 1990-2004”
L. R. Kimball Agency, 2012, ‘Consolidation Feasibility
Study’, Office of Statewide Emergency
Telecommunications State of Connecticut
Russ Russell, 2003, ‘SME 911 Consulting - PSAP
Stuffing Guidelines Worksheet: PSAP Requirements-
NENA Standarts’ http://www.nena.org/?page=
Standards. pp.1-4.
André, M./Hammerström, U./Reynaud, I.,1999, “Driving
Statistics for the Assessment of Pollutant Emissions
from Road Transport” Inrets,Bron,Report LTE
9906,pp.170-172.
Kristian Bodek, John Heywood, March 2008, ‘Europe’s
Evolving Passenger Vehicle Fleet: Fuel Use and GHG
Emission Scenarios through 2035, MIT Laboratory for
the Energy and Environment, pp.29-31.
Shane B. McLaughlin, 2007, ‘Analytic Assessment of
Collision Avoidance Systems and Driver Dynamic
Performance in Rear-End Crashes and Near-Crashes’
PHD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
E-MERGE Project,2004, “Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, E-
MERGE Compiled Evaluation Results, Deliverable
6.3.”
‘Italy Population Rates-County and City population data’
http://www.citypopulation.de/Italy.html Accessed 5
January 2016
‘European Commission ExternE programme’
https://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/pdf/kina_en.pdf
accessed 29 December 2015
‘Italy Road Rates - The World Factbook Publications’
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/fields/2085.html ; accessed 29 November
2015
EU Parliament and Council of EU, 2015, ‘REGULATION
(EU) 2015/758 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL’, Office Journal of the
European Union, 29 April 2015, pp. L123/77-L123/89
European Commission, 2003a, “Extended impact
assessment of the proposal for a decision amending
Decision No 1692/96/EC on the trans-European
transport network”, Commission Staff Working Paper,
SEC-2003 1060, Brussels 01.10.2003.