Table 5: Cardinality Table (Q1,Q2).
Table 6: Result.
ToDo List
Reminder
Mail
Test’s
Deadline
Weighted
Average
0.078324 0.173297 -0.10338
Center of
Gravity
0.084673 0.188755 -0.11257
Fuzzy
Entropy
0.170076 0.372188 0.222228
5 CONCLUSION
We executed a needs analysis of the students
applying type-2 fuzzy 5 × 5 contingency table. As a
result, it was able to confirm its effectiveness as a
method. Further, we would like to improve
analytical methods in the future.
This paper is a part of the outcome of research
performed under a Waseda University Grant for
Special Research Projects (Project number: 2016B-
310).
REFERENCES
N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takahashi, S. Tsuji: Attractive
quality and must-be quality, Journal of the Japanese
Society for Quality Control 14(2), pp. 39-48, 1984 (in
Japanese).
M. Rashid, J. Tamaki, A. M. M. S. Ullah, and A. Kubo: A
Kano Model Based Linguistic Application for
Customer Needs Analysis, International Journal of
Engineering Business Management, Vol.3, No.2, pp.
30-36, 2011.
H. Uesu, S. Takagi: An analysis of students’ needs for
undergraduate mathematics lectures through the Kano
model, Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent
Informatics Soft Science Workshop, pp. 87-88, 2014
(in Japanese).
H. Uesu: Students’ needs analysis for media lectures
applying Kano model, Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory
and Intelligent Informatics Soft Science Workshop,
pp. 89-90, 2014(in Japanese).
H. Uesu: Needs Analysis for Media Lectures Applying
Kano Model, Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and
Intelligent Informatics Fuzzy System Symposium,
pp. 208-211, 2014(in Japanese).
H. Uesu, S. Kanagawa: Student Needs Analysis Applying
Fuzzy Contingency Table, the 27th Annual
Conference of Biomedical Fuzzy System Association,
pp. 45-46, 2014.