assistance. Again ethical issues are raised, about the
privacy of the individual, so perhaps this would be a
situation to be included in a "living will" agreeing to
some elements of surveillance by their "pet".
Robots could play a further part in assisting the
elderly and disabled to live independently, replacing
in part, the visiting human carer, in their roles of
distributing and ensuring medication is taken. This
could be undertaken by a robot, reporting back to
"control" if the robot does not "see" the medicine
being swallowed. Again this might be viewed as an
infringement of the person's privacy, despite being
possibly essential for their health. The human carer
usually would help their "patient" with washing,
assisting them with dressing and undressing, as well
as the very personal role of helping them in the
toilet. Robots are capable of undertaking these roles,
but would this be acceptable to the "patient". The
carers in the UK, provided by the local authority,
now have been asked, in many cases, to reduce their
visits to fifteen minutes or thirty minutes per visit,
whereas the robot would be available 24x7 for the
patient. Elderly independent livers are often
delivered cooked meals, often by volunteers, to their
homes, but with very limited choice of timing or
menu. Robots could provide freshly prepared meals
on demand, and assist the "patient" to eat, and also
recording any problem or abnormal eating
behaviour. Again there are major benefits in addition
to ethical dilemmas. The "patient" would probably
like human visitors so by using these robots, the
human visitor need not be a highly trained carer but
could possibly be provided by links to local colleges
or charities. Additional human social interaction
could currently be provided through the Internet,
with human friends who might be globally separated.
The quality of this type of care could be seen to be by
some as better than the human carer (Ross, 2015).
The acceptability, rather than the technical
ability of such robot based caring, is a major
consideration. The willingness to undertake such
care, where provided at home, at a retirement
establishment or at a hospital, needs to be addressed,
not only by the person, again in a "living will", but
also by the authorities. These must not be influenced
only by the potential financial savings to the state.
The use of robots as a nanny with the care of
children is even more of an ethical dilemma, with
legal implications for the parents and guardians.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Students of today need to understand both the
current and future applications of technology, but
also the ethical decisions, which could be more
difficult to solve than the technical problems.
With the increasing availability of e-learning,
both for initial learning at colleges or as self-study,
e-learning can now be used to "up skill" throughout
to the whole career and during retirement. It can be
accessed easily through mobile phones and other
technology throughout the world, personalised for
individuals, and at times that are convenient for the
user. This compares to attending conventional
courses, which might not be available locally or are
too expensive. This can change the e-learning
pattern lifelong, to provide a means to enhance the
mental capacity of all, including the elderly.
This could also help to address the issues of
dementia, providing an option to mentally stimulate
the elderly, those with learning difficulty and also
those separated from other regular human contact.
These e-learning opportunities can now be provided
in a form suitable for all, especially those with
disabilities, including the blind and the deaf.
The current and future technology offers
wonderful potential to assist all, regardless of age,
ability and location, but, as with all good things,
there is a possible "down side". In this case, rather
than issues of cost, the ethical issues could be a need
for consideration now and in the future.
REFERENCES
BCS, ND, BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT,
http://www.bcs.org/ (accessed 2/2/2016)
CAS, ND, Computing at School, http://www.computing
atschool.org.uk/ (accessed 2/2/2016)
Dewar, E., Uhomoibhi, J., Ross, M., Hutty, D., 2014.
MOOCs development and implementation: The
challenges and prospects for higher education in
emerging countries, ISBN 978-0-9926958-2-8, GIobal
Issues in IT Education, 2014
EC report, 2014, Report to the European Commission on
New Modes of Learning and Teaching in Higher
Education, ISBN 978-92-79-39789-9
Griffin, B., Ross, M., 2015. Speak and be Hard Later: Use
of Audio-Visual Support at Southampton Solent
University, Proc INSPIRE 2015
Internet Murder, 2014, This Week, 7/10/2014
Ross, M., 2015. Future Changes in the New Internet Age,
ITA15, Wrexham, North Wales
Uhomoibhi, J., Ross, M., 2013. Globalisation and e-
Learning: Integrating University and Professional
Qualifications for Employability and Lifelong
Learning, ICEL 2013 (International Conference on e-
learning), Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Cape Town 27 28th June, 2013