stimulation process not only neck ganglia, but also
influence on the stellate ganglion, the afferent
branches of the cervical plexus, cranial nerves and
their branches as well as other components of the
sympathetic trunk. All in all, abovementioned
improvements significantly enhance possibilities of
the new technical implementations of the
“SYMPATHOCOR-01” device in
neurorehabilitation tasks.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The article describes new technical implementation
of the “SYMPATHOCOR-01” device.
Implementation of the device as the two block
allowed to improve ergonomic characteristics, to
make the device mobile and compact, to realize the
simultaneous stimulation of the patients group by
single doctor. Presented in the article analysis of the
organizational and control principles of the
“SYMPATHOCOR-01” device new implementation
revealed the innovative possibilities in the
neurorehabilitation tasks. Device mobility and
wireless control allow doctors to combine several
kind of stimulation including cognitive and motor
loads and neuro-electrostimulation using
“SYMPATHOCOR-01” device.
The next step of device implementation is
automatic real-time recording of the functional
changes in the central and autonomic nervous
systems. This recording will allow us to improve
informational control of the treatment management
and to increase treatment efficiency.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work was supported by Act 211 Government of
the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0006.
REFERENCES
Danilov, Y. P. and Kublanov, V. S., 2014. Emerging
Noninvasive Neurostimulation Technologies: CN-
NINM and SYMPATOCORECTION. Journal of
Behavioral and Brain Science, 4 (3), 105–113.
Enriquez-Geppert, S., Huster, R.J., and Herrmann, C.S.,
2013. Boosting brain functions: Improving executive
functions with behavioral training, neurostimulation,
and neurofeedback. International Journal of
Psychophysiology, 88 (1), 1–16.
Kublanov, V. S., 2008. A hardware-software system for
diagnosis and correction of autonomic dysfunctions.
Biomedical Engineering, 42 (4), 206–212.
Kublanov, V. S. and Babich, M. V., 2015. Principles of
organization and control of multielectrode neuro-
electrostimulation device. In: Biomedical Engineering
and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON), 2015
International Conference on. IEEE, 82–86.
Kublanov, V. S., Shmirev, V. I., Shershever, A. S., and
Kazakov, J.E., 2010. About Innovative Possibilities of
Device ‘SIMPATOCOR-01’ in Management of
Functional Disorders of Vegetative and Central
Nervous System in Neurology. Kremlin medicine.
Clinical Vestnik, 4, 60–64.
Nagai, M. K., Marquez-Chin, C., and Popovic, M. R.,
2016. Why Is Functional Electrical Stimulation
Therapy Capable of Restoring Motor Function
Following Severe Injury to the Central Nervous
System? In: M. H. Tuszynski, ed. Translational
Neuroscience. Springer US, 479–498.
Netter, F. H., 2010. Atlas of human anatomy. Elsevier
Health Sciences.
Reichardt, L.F., 2006. Neurotrophin-regulated signalling
pathways. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361 (1473),
1545–1564.
Yuan, T.-F., Chen, W., Shan, C., Rocha, N., Arias-
Carrion, O., Paes, F., de Sa, A.S., and Machado, S.,
2015. Activity-Dependent Neurorehabilitation Beyond
Physical Trainings: ‘Mental Exercise’ Through Mirror
Neuron Activation. CNS & Neurological Disorders -
Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets, 14
(10), 1267–1271.