is to take into account the fact that several EVs may
compete for the same electricity source. So, it ap-
pears that the fleet of should be coordinated in order
to attain a consensus so that the amount of electricity
harvested by the whole fleet of EVs is maximized. In
addition to this, one should take into account the fact
that a specific subclass of sources of electricity may
be used to rapidly charge EVs, thus offering the op-
portunity to make a stop when travelling, or even to
take a small detour, in order to get to a fast-charging
station.
The app should be an efficient tool for reach-
ing such a consensus among the static and dynamic
agents. To this end, we suggest building an app in the
form of a two-sided market platform.
2.1 Two-sided Market
One main role of the app is to create a convenient way
for PV panel owners to share (and sell) their electric-
ity to EV drivers. This is particularly important, since
the electrical network has not been designed to absorb
electricity production from private dwellings. For ex-
ample, during solar production peaks, PV panels may
have to be disconnected because of overvoltages on
the network (see e.g., (Olivier et al., 2016)). Neither
has the electric network been designed to supply a
sufficient amount of power sufficient to fully recharge
a large fleet of EVs in a few hours within a neighbour-
hood.
Consequently, on one side we have PV panels
owners that may want to find a way to profitably ex-
ploit their installation, and on the other side we have
EV drivers who may be constrained to charge their
vehicles while they are occupied by other tasks. The
app is aimed at satisfying both requirements and to
make it easy for each sides’ to benefit from the other
needs.
2.2 Driver Services
To be successful, the app must be attractive to EV
drivers. For this purpose, a booking service will be
provided to guarantee a charge level for the drivers.
Moreover, the app intelligence should be able to pro-
pose a flexible and suitable choice of charging points
depending on the user needs.
One way for the app to output convenient charging
point suggestions would be to specify journeys using
a set of geographical points. The simplest case would
be to specify the starting point (A) and the destina-
tion (B). In this configuration, the app would compute
the optimal stations at which the driver should stop as
they travel from A to B, knowing the level of charge,
consumption and battery autonomy of the vehicle. A
more-advanced case would be to specify three geo-
graphical points: the starting point (A), a stop (B)
and a final destination (C), as well as the time dura-
tion spent at location B, where it may be possible to
recharge the EV. Taking all these parameters into ac-
count, plus eventually additional constraints that the
drivers may have, it would suggest the best stations
for drivers where they should stop during the jour-
ney. Obviously, suggestions should also be optimized
in order to minimize energy costs and/or curtailment.
As the app interacts with a fleet of EVs and not just
one single EV, it may also be interesting to optimize
charging station suggestions globally rather than on a
single EV basis. This would lead to a better solution
at the level of an EV fleet but may penalize some EV
owners due to a possible lack of fairness of the global
solution. This fairness issue could be addressed by
implementing a compensation mechanism. It could
consist in monetary terms, but also in other advan-
tages like free charge or booking priority.
2.3 Producer Services
Producers can be divided into two categories: compa-
nies and individuals. Companies can either be large
renewable energy source owners, DSOs or substantial
charging-point owners, whereas the individuals con-
sist mainly of private owners of PV units, with a nom-
inal power less than 10 kWp, and who also want to
sell the electricity they produce.
We may reasonably assume that, in many cases,
EV users may want to book a charging station,
through the app, that has a significant charging power
(e.g., higher than 20 kW). This may penalize individ-
ual charging stations, which, if they want to sell their
green electricity, are limited to the power produced
by their PV installation. However, we can reason-
ably assume that in the coming years, with the rise
of batteries, these individual producers should be able
to store their excess of green electricity. In such a
context, during certain periods of the day, they could
offer a charging power close to the power of the PV
installation plus the power that their batteries can de-
liver. Indeed, with a 10 kWp PV installation, an indi-
vidual producer will not be able to sell many green
charges per week due to the rather limited amount
of energy that such an installation can produce. In-
deed, if we assume a load factor of 8.9% for the PV
installation, the average European load factor for PV
(Energy - Yearly statistics 2008 (Eurostat)), the 10
kWp PV installation would produce on a daily ba-
sis 10 × 0.089 × 24 = 21.36 kWh. So, at most, only
once every three days, the individual producer will be
An App-based Algorithmic Approach for Harvesting Local and Renewable Energy using Electric Vehicles
323