expected. For instance, in this work grating spectral
selectivity was just 0.7nm which is exceeding
neodymium gain bandwidth. Therefore, we assume
that parameter which plays key role in frequency
stabilization is angular selectivity of the grating.
Placing the grating inside the cavity provide strict
conditions on the radiation direction of propagation.
This conditions so strong that only one wavelength in
the cavity can fulfill it during spontaneous
luminescence. And thus this wavelength has a better
feedback and lower threshold in comparison with
other frequencies. Thus this results in narrowing the
emission spectra of the laser. But in terms of stability
it still unclear why application of transmitting volume
Bragg grating locks pulse to pulse frequency. We
presume that combination of high angular selectivity
and mirror 2 position in our setup defines the
wavelength. Their relative orientation determines the
optical path inside the cavity and the only frequency
which can travel through this path considering Bragg
condition is start to rise. In confirmation of this
speculation we build up a single loop cavity in which
loop was made by 3 cavity mirrors and transmitting
Bragg grating (Fig. 8).
Figure 8: Single loop cavity with transmitting VBG. 1 –
active element, 2-4 – cavity mirrors, 5 – volume Bragg
grating, 6,7 – output coupler.
This setup differs from what we used before but in
this case we also achieved frequency stabilization and
narrowing with transmitting volume Bragg grating in
presence of any of output couplers (OC). But if we
remove both mirrors 6 and 7 we obtain a narrow line
pulses with no stability in pulse to pulse frequency.
Interesting fact that there is no difference if mirror 6
or 7 is in cavity, any of them in combination with
volume Bragg grating provides frequency
stabilization. Thus we assume that in this kind of
setup optical path of a beam inside the cavity depends
from wavelength and in the absence of OC operating
frequency is undetermined. But as soon as we apply
any of OC we induce additional selection to the
cavity. As before there is plenty of optical paths with
different wavelength exist in the cavity but now only
one of them fulfill Bragg condition and receive
feedback from OC which decrease its threshold. In
addition, we could adjust operating frequency by
slight rotation of either grating or OC itself. This can
serve as a proof of our ideas about wavelength
stabilization.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In present work we successfully demonstrated laser
frequency stabilization of an adaptive self-phase-
conjugated passively Q-switched laser by mean of the
transmitting volume Bragg grating on the photo-
thermo-refractive glass. As expected this grating
provides desired pulse to pulse frequency stability.
Moreover, our investigation shows that
implementation of the volume Bragg grating in the
multiloop cavity reduce the bandwidth of the
radiation from 18 to 4 pm with outstanding output
parameters such as pulse energy of 100mJ, peak
power of 10MWt and beam quality of M
2
=1.15. We
assume that the key factor of wavelength stabilization
in our case is angular selectivity of the grating. But it
operates only with feedback mirror.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was financially supported by Russian
Scientific Foundation (Agreement # 14-23-00136)
REFERENCES
Boreysho A. S., Konyaev M. A., Morozov A. V., Pikulik A.
V., Savin A. V., Trilis A. V., Chakchir S. Ya., Boiko N.
I., Vlasov Yu. N., Nikitaev S. P., and Rozhnov A. V.,
2005 Mobile multiwave lidar complexes Quantum
Electron., 35, pp.1167-1178.
Lebedev V. F., and Shestakov A. A., 2011 Fast LIBS
identification of solids during the laser ablation process.
Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 7822, p. 78220V.
Basiev T.T., Garnov S.V., Klimentov S.M., Pivovarov
P.A., Gavrilov A.V., Smetanin S.N., Solokhin S.A., and
Fedin A.V., 2007. High-speed ablation of ultradeep
channels by a phase-conjugate dynamically controlled
passively Q-switched Nd:YAG laser Quantum
Electron., 37, pp. 956-960.
Bel’dugin I.M., Berenberg V.A., Vasil’ev A.E., Mochalov
I.V., Petnikova V.M., Petrovskii G.T., Harchenko
M.A., and Shuvalov V.V., 1989. Solid-state lasers with