![](bg8.png)
the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technol-
ogy Education, SIGITE ’15, pages 21–26, New York,
NY, USA. ACM.
Fronza, I., El Ioini, N., Janes, A., Sillitti, A., Succi, G.,
and Corral, L. (2014). If I had to vote on this lab-
oratory, I would give nine: Introduction on Compu-
tational Thinking in the lower secondary school: Re-
sults of the experience. Mondo Digitale, 13(51):757–
765.
Grover, S. and Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in
k–12. a review of the state of the field. Educational
researcher, 42(1):38–43.
Hackman, J. R. and Vidmar, N. J. (1970). Effects of size
and task type on group performance and member re-
actions. Sociometry, 33:37–54.
Hambrusch, S., Hoffmann, C., Korb, J. T., Haugan, M., and
Hosking, A. L. (2009). A multidisciplinary approach
towards computational thinking for science majors.
SIGCSE Bull., 41(1):183–187.
Hemmendinger, D. (2010). A plea for modesty. ACM In-
roads, 1(2):4–7.
Holzinger, A., Errath, M., Searle, G., Thurnher, B., and
Slany, W. (2005). From extreme programming and
usability engineering to extreme usability in soft-
ware engineering education. In 29th Annual Interna-
tional Computer Software and Applications Confer-
ence (COMPSAC’05), volume 1, pages 169–172.
ISTE and CSTA (2011). Operational definition
of computational thinking for k-12 education.
http://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/ Comp-
ThinkingFlyer.pdf. Accessed: 21/02/2017.
Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, ACM and IEEE
Computer Society (2013). Computer Science Curric-
ula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate
Degree Programs in Computer Science. ACM, New
York, NY, USA. 999133.
Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., and Ben-Ari, M. M.
(2010). Learning computer science concepts with
scratch. In Proceedings of the Sixth International
Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER
’10, pages 69–76, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Moreno-Leon, J., Robles, G., and Roman-Gonzalez, M.
(2015). Dr. scratch: Automatic analysis of scratch
projects to assess and foster computational thinking.
RED-Revista de Educacin a Distancia, 46:1–23.
Prey, J. C. and Weaver, A. C. A. (2013). Fostering gender
diversity in computing. Computer, 46(3):22–23.
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hern
´
andez, A., Rusk,
N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosen-
baum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., et al. (2009).
Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the
ACM, 52(11):60–67.
Sarmento, H. R., Reis, C. A. S., Zaramella, V., Almeida, L.
D. A., and Tacla, C. A. (2015). Supporting the Devel-
opment of Computational Thinking: A Robotic Plat-
form Controlled by Smartphone. In Proceedings of
the Second International Conference on Learning and
Collaboration Technologies, volume 9192 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 124–135. Springer
International Publishing.
Settle, A., Franke, B., Hansen, R., Spaltro, F., Jurisson, C.,
Rennert-May, C., and Wildeman, B. (2012). Infus-
ing computational thinking into the middle- and high-
school curriculum. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM
Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in
Computer Science Education, ITiCSE ’12, pages 22–
27, New York, USA. ACM.
Shoop, R., Flot, J., Friez, T., Schunn, C., and Witherspoon,
E. (2016). Can computational thinking practices be
taught in robotics classrooms? In International Tech-
nology and Engineering Education Conference, pages
1–15. Carnegie Mellon Robotics Academy/University
of Pittsburgh.
Stamouli, I., Doyle, E., and Huggard, M. (2004). Establish-
ing structured support for programming students. In
Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34th Annual,
pages F2G–5. IEEE.
Sung, K. and Samuel, A. (2014). Mobile application devel-
opment classes for the mobile era. In Proceedings of
the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in
Computer Science Education, ITiCSE’14, pages 141–
146, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., and Yadav, A.
(2015). Computational thinking in compulsory edu-
cation: Towards an agenda for research and practice.
Education and Information Technologies, 20(4):715–
728.
Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., and Kawamoto, D. C.
(2012). The fairy performance assessment: Measuring
computational thinking in middle school. In Proceed-
ings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Com-
puter Science Education, SIGCSE ’12, pages 215–
220, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Comm. ACM,
49(3).
Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking benefits so-
ciety. http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu. Accessed:
21/02/2017.
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., H
¨
ost, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell,
B., and Wessl
´
en, A. (2000). Experimentation in soft-
ware engineering: an introduction. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA.
CSEDU 2017 - 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
116