![](bg8.png)
Egyed, A. and Boehm, B. (1997). Analysis of system re-
quirements negotiation behavior patterns. In Proc. of
INCOSE, pages 481–488.
Egyed, A. and Boehm, B. (1999). Comparing software sys-
tem requirements negotiation patterns. Systems Engi-
neering, 2(1):1–14.
Felizardo, K. R., Mendes, E., Kalinowski, M., Souza, E. F.,
and Vijaykumar, N. L. (2016). Using forward snow-
balling to update systematic reviews in software engi-
neering. In Proc. of ESEM, pages 53:1–53:6.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P. (2000). Collaborative requirements negotia-
tion with easywinwin. In Proc. of DEXA, pages 954–
958.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P. and Boehm, B. (2001). Easywinwin: A
groupware-supported methodology for requirements
negotiation. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 26(5):320–
321.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P. and Braunsberger, P. (2003). Tool support
for distributed requirements negotiation. Cooperative
methods and tools for distributed software processes,
pages 56–66.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P. and Briggs, R. O. (2001). Surfacing tacit
knowledge in requirements negotiation: experiences
using easywinwin. In Proc. of HICSS.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P., Egyed, A., and Medvidovic, N. (2001).
Reconciling software requirements and architectures:
The cbsp approach. In Proc. of RE, pages 202–211.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P., Egyed, A., and Medvidovic, N. (2004a).
Reconciling software requirements and architectures
with intermediate models. Software & Systems Mod-
eling, 3(3):235–253.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P., Halling, M., Biffl, S., BIFFL, S., and
Boehm, B. W. (2004b). Integrating collaborative pro-
cesses and quality assurance techniques: experiences
from requirements negotiation. Journal of Manage-
ment Inf. Sys., 20(4):9–29.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P. and Seyff, N. (2005). Requirements negoti-
ation. In Engineering and managing software require-
ments, pages 143–162. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Gr
¨
unbacher, P., Seyff, N., Briggs, R. O., In, H. P., Kitapci,
H., and Port, D. (2007). Making every student a win-
ner: The winwin approach in software engineering ed-
ucation. JSS, 80(8):1191 – 1200.
In, H., Boehm, B., Rodgers, T., and Deutsch, M. (2001).
Applying winwin to quality requirements: a case
study. In Proc. of ICSE, pages 555–564.
In, H. P. and Olson, D. (2004). Requirements negotia-
tion using multi-criteria preference analysis. J.UCS,
10(4):306–325.
In, H. P., Olson, D., and Rodgers, T. (2002). Multi-criteria
preference analysis for systematic requirements ne-
gotiation. In Proceedings of the Annual Interna-
tional Computer Software and Applications Confer-
ence (COMPSAC), pages 887–892.
Kazman, R., In, H. P., and Chen, H.-M. (2005). From
requirements negotiation to software architecture de-
cisions. Information and Software Technology,
47(8):511–520.
Khan, U. Z., Wahab, F., and Saeed, S. (2014). Integra-
tion of scrum with win-win requirements negotiation
model. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research,
19(1):101–104.
Kitapci, H. and Boehm, B. W. (2007). Formalizing informal
stakeholder decisions–a hybrid method approach. In
Proc. of HICSS.
Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for per-
forming systematic literature reviews in software en-
gineering. Technical report, Keele University.
Le Bon, G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. UltraLetters.
Lee, M.-j. (1996). Foundations of the winwin requirements
negotiation system. PhD thesis, University of South-
ern California.
M
´
endez Fern
´
andez, D., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., and
et al. (2016). Naming the pain in requirements en-
gineering: Contemporary problems, causes, and ef-
fects in practice. Empirical Software Engineering
(doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9451-7), pages 1–41.
Raja, B. S., Iqbal, M. A., and Ihsan, I. (2007). Moving
from problem space to solution space. Int. J. of Social,
Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and In-
dustrial Engineering, 1(11):764–767.
Ramires, J., Antunes, P., and Resp
´
ıcio, A. (2005). Software
requirements negotiation using the software quality
function deployment. In International Conference on
Collaboration and Technology (CRIWG), pages 308–
324.
Ruhe, G. (2002). Software engineering decision support–
a new paradigm for learning software organizations.
In Int. Workshop on Learning Software Organizations,
pages 104–113.
Ruhe, G., Eberlein, A., and Pfahl, D. (2002). Quantita-
tive winwin: A new method for decision support in
requirements negotiation. In Proc. of SEKE, SEKE
’02, pages 159–166, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Ruhe, G., Eberlein, A., and Pfahl, D. (2003). Trade-off anal-
ysis for requirements selection. IJSEKE, 13(04):345–
366.
Schopenhauer, A. (1831). Die Kunst zu beleidigen. C.H.
Beck.
Stallinger, F. and Gr
¨
unbacher, P. (2001). System dynam-
ics modelling and simulation of collaborative require-
ments engineering. JSS, 59(3):311 – 321.
Vogl, H., Lehner, K., Gr
¨
unbacher, P., and Egyed, A. (2011).
Reconciling requirements and architectures with the
cbsp approach in an iphone app project. In Proc. of
RE, pages 273–278.
Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., and Rolland, C.
(2005). Requirements engineering paper classification
and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion.
Requirements Engineering, 11(1):102–107.
A Systematic Mapping of Software Requirements Negotiation Techniques
525