This law defined the beach as a zone adjacent to
the seashore, with a width of “up to 50metres”. This
zone is a buffer zone between land and sea and, like
the seashore, is included within the Greek public
domain. It is usually defined in spatial plans of
coastal settlements and rural areas as “open space”,
but may be used for roads, pedestrian and bicycle
routes. But there is no requirement that the beach is
defined and in many cases, it is not.
This law restricts development on the coastal
zone and beyond but it also provides many
exceptions to these restrictions in order to encourage
the tourism potential of the coast. Today the primary
issue is extensive illegal development in restricted
areas and a lack of political will to take action
against such development. The most recent law
(4178/2013) nullifies any previous laws which
allowed for legalization, though still provides
exceptions for types of development which may be
legalized. As was the case in 1983, illegal
development on public land, the beach, or seashore
may not be legalized and must be demolished. In
2014, Greece adopted a new procedure for
delineation of the coast based on the interpretation
of aerial photographs. Today coastal zones are
further threatened by the effects of climate change,
in particular rising sea levels, changes in storm
frequency and strength, and increased coastal
erosion and flooding.
Only light construction associated with seasonal
tourist and recreation facilities (open playgrounds,
kiosks, mobile beach bars and refreshment areas)
may be erected on the seashore and beach. The
process for their establishment includes an
application from business operators to the relevant
Municipality. The municipalities set the cost and the
revenue generated through the process is an
important component of their budgets. Still many
business owners violate these regulations. Access to
the sea is obstructed in many areas often by
approved private uses such as hotels and businesses.
The lack of controlling mechanisms combined
with loose policies has today made Planning of the
examined area ineffective. Although restrictions for
uses and buildings permits exist these are rarely
followed. The accessibility to the beach is mainly
served by cars that causes traffic congestion during
the summer period. The tourism infrastructures are
closer than the allowed distance to the beach and the
materials used for the creation of roads have
degraded the environment. All the above have led to
an area with a limited coast, with a limited access
that is mainly covered by seasonal facilities
accessible mainly to the clients of the area hotels.
3 REDISIGNING THE AREA
WITH SUSTAINABLE
PRINCIPLES
The design proposal of the present study for the
coastal zone of Georgioupoli aims at re-designing
the zoning of the beach, based on the legal
framework described above, in order to protect it
from anthropogenic and other impacts. We propose
the following concept:
1. Human intervention must be prohibited at any
case. There must be control using aerial or
satellite images to keep up with all the changes.
2. Offshore beach nourishment can restore the
beaches and protect them from erosion. There
are different methods for beach nourishment
(Dean, 2003) but for not so long beaches less
than 1km length sand can be located without
creating any problems.
3. Planted trees and natural vegetation will not
only provide a beautiful image of the scene but
provide a physical barrier against wind and
coastal erosion.
4. It is essential to remove the cars from the
coastal zone that means to avoid roads, even if
they are not intensively used. Free public access
towards the coastal zone is important by
planning what encourages the best possible
access to the beach.
5. Decongestion of the beach zone from traffic in
particular form public transport, as well as
encouraging and rewarding the use of
alternative modes of transportation, such as
bicycling and walking, is considered crucial.
Thereupon, the preservation of an one-way, 3.5
meter wide traffic axis is recommended for
bicycles, aiming to encourage safer, more
responsible driving, and potentially reduce
traffic flow (traffic calming).
6. Seawall constructions should not be allowed. It
is already discussed that seawalls increase
erosion and destroy the beach (Basco 1999)
7. The construction of the roads to the beach must
be made by other material then asphalt. The
removal of asphalt road and its replacement by
sidewalks by paved floor allows the
development of a variety of other uses such as
the bicycle, pedestrians, playgrounds and
staging areas. Therefore a well-designed coastal
zone with public uses can attract not only
tourism but also the area’s residents.
8. Beach access with “vertical” or perpendicular
lines. Public authorities have the right to