The data in Table 2 are similar to Table 1 for the
period of time in which the rainy season occurs,
however, the river flow data varies abruptly in the
Table 2.
Finally, the third simulation was done eliminating
the highAndeanForest object. The data obtained are
shown in the following table:
Table 3: Rain precipitation and river flow including only
Paramo ecosystem.
Month Rainfall(Lt) Cabrera river flow(Lt/H)
1 108,26 44,23
2 194,71 3,80
3 540,59 12,02
4 467,19 23,67
5 1443,40 39,31
6 1713,36 54,60
7 2059,47 72,19
8 450,80 14,22
9 259,73 9,50
10 395,28 9,78
11 200,28 7,70
12 102,78 4,88
The third simulation shows a huge drop in the
amount of rainfall recorded with respect to the
previous simulations.
The following graph corresponds to the
comparison of flow river, taking into account the data
of Tables 1,2 and 3:
Figure 6: Comparison of the river flow for the simulation 1,
2 and 3.
Analyzing the Figure 6, it is observed that the flow
of the river is balanced due to the interaction of both
ecosystems (the paramo and high Andean forest),
while in the simulation that includes only the high
Andean forest the river flow undergoes drastic
changes.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Observing the Figure 6, the importance of the
paramos as regulators of the water cycle is evidenced,
because in the rainy seasons they avoid that rivers
flow grows in excessive form, whereas in the dry
seasons they maintain the flow due to the water that
is released periodically by them.
On the other hand, the data in Table 3 reflect the
importance of high Andean forests because they
evaporate a large amount of water, which then falls as
rain over the paramos.
Reactive agents were necessary techniques in the
simulation of ecosystems because they allowed to
generate interaction of each component of the
ecosystem with the environment, those simple
interactions generated emergency, which is a
characteristic of complex systems
REFERENCES
Díaz-Granados Ortiz, M., Navarrete González, J. & Suárez
López, T., 2005. Páramos: Sensitive
Hydrosystems.Available at:http://www.scielo.org.co/
scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-
49932005000200008.
Flexas, J., Loreto, F. & Medrano, H., 2012. Terrestrial
Photosyntesis in a Changing Environment. first ed.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GREENPEACE, 2013. Páramos en Peligro. Available
at:http://www.greenpeace.org/colombia/
Global/colombia/images/2013/paramos/12/Informe%2
0P%C3%A1ramos%20en%20peligro.pdf.
IUCN, 2010. Paramos. Available at:
https://www.iucn.org/content/paramos.
Ospina Rodríguez, M., 2003. El Páramo de Sumapaz un
Ecosistema Estratégico para Bogotá.Available at:
https://www.sogeocol.edu.co/documentos/Paramos.pd
f.
Palmeri, L., Barausse, A. & Jorgensen, S. E., 2014.
Ecological Processes Handbook. New York: Tayor &
Francis Group.
Russi, D. & others, 2013. The Economics of Ecosystems
and Biodiversity for Water and Weatlands. Available
at: http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/
04/TEEB_WaterWetlands_Report_2013.pdf.
Vásquez, A. & Buitrago, A. C., 2011. El Grán Libro de los
Páramos, Bogotá D.C: Recursos Biologicos Alexander
von Humboldt.
Villarraga Morales, J. A. & Alvarado Nieto, L. D., 2016.
Aplicación De Agentes Reactivos Simples En La
Simulación De Árboles Pertenecientes A Ecosistemas
Colombianos. Available at: http://fi.uaemex.mx/
congresoFIuaem/libro_congreso.pdf.
Vlahavas, I. & Dimitris, V., 2005. Intelligent Techniques
for Planing. United Kingdom: Idea Group Publishing.