learning organizations (Srihawong and Srisa-Ard,
2012).
The qualities of learning organizations are
highlighted upon findings as follows:
1. Those working in learning organizations are
satisfied with their life motivation;
2. Learning organizations promise future for
their members;
3. Learning organizations value creativity;
4. Learning organizations provide a reliable
ground for individuals
Further to this, headmasters indicated that open
leadership strategies need to be associated with a
system to encourage continuous learning, creating
new knowledge, management values the emotional
intelligence and its importance in knowledge
creation, the creativity and unconventional thinking,
action learning to train staff in developing skills,
policy to encourage the creation of learning
communities, team learning (Akcil, et al., 2016).
As the process of establishing a learning
organization involves three stages as forming
learning individual; forming a learning team and
forming a learning organization, learning how to
learn at individual level starts with the pushing force
of the increasing learning opportunities. Learning
school is not where students create active “teaching”
but it is where the activity of “learning” takes place.
Learning school attempts to establish difference and
re-structuring within the fundamental system it uses.
There is no teacher and learner distinguished in
learning schools. From the school director to the
cleaner, to students and parents, everyone is a
learner that open leadership policy may foster this
learning process (Akcil, et al., 2016). Then, learning
happens at individual, team and organizational
levels. School succeeds in catching with change,
renovating itself and being up-to-date through
learning. Learning schools aims to establish learning
discipline as well. This discipline is built on
developing a shared vision and personal ability
discipline however, shared vision and abilities are
not adequate. Change does not happen on policies
and practices but also in the thinking and interaction
ways within school and the number of schools with
this type of change is increasing (Smith, 2001). In
digital age, the goal of education is to raise learning
individuals and help individuals in learning how to
learn. School as a learning organization is the one
where students are in active “learning” activity is in
the forefront than “teaching” (Gazi, 2016). For
further studies, experimental research can be done to
reveal experiences of headmasters. Perceptions and
experience of parents, teachers can be examined
action plans and implementation can be done in
schools for the future.
REFERENCES
Akcil, U., Altinay, F., Altinay, Z. (2016). Assesing the
effects of managers in the digital age on the
management process of digital citizenship roles. The
Antropologist.
Akcıl, U., Aksal. A., F., Mukhametzyanova, F.S., Gazi.
A., Z. (2016). An examination of open and technology
leadership in managerial practices of education
system. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science
and Technology Education, 13(1), 119-131.
Altınay, F., Daglı, G., Altınay, Z. (2016). Digital
transformation in school management and culture.
Virtual Learning, InTech.
Aksal, F. A. (2015). Are headmasters digital leaders in
school culture? Education & Science, 40,77-86.
Alipour, F. & Karimi, R. (2011). Mediation role of
innovation and knowledge transfer in the relationship
between learning organization and organizational
performance. International Journal of Business and
Social Science, 2(19), 144-147.
Armstrong, A. & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a
learning organization: Organization learning
mechanisms.The Learning Organization, 10(2).
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative,
quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gazi. A., Z. (2016). Internalization of digital citizenship
for the future of all levels of education. Education &
Science, 41(186).
Jokıć, S., Ćosıc, L., Sajfert, Z., Pečujlıja, M. & Pardanjac,
M. (2012). Schools as learning organizations:
Empirical Study In Serbia. Metalurgia International,
17(2), 83-89.
Lyle, E.R. (2012). Learning organisation all learning.
International Journal of Business and Social Science,
3(6), 217-221.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative
data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.).
California: SAGE Publications.
Smith, M. K. (2001). ‘Peter Senge and the learning
organization’, The Encyclopedia of Informaleducation.
(http://infed.org/mobi/peter-senge-and-the-learning-
organization/).
Srihawong, J. & Srisa-Ard, B. (2012). Development of the
learning organization model: a case of sisaketrajabhat
university. European Journal of Social Sciences. 27(2),
233- 241.
Yikici, B., Altinay, Z., Dagli, G., Altinay, F. (2016). The
evaluation of strategies used to improve teaching and
learning in education society. The Antropologist, 23,
462-479.