the early age of children, which should result in
sufficient knowledge about zakat.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia defined literacy as
quality or ability to understand letter including ability
to read and write (KBBI, 2016). However, literacy
particularly concern on individual ability to
understand and recognize ideas that visually
delivered. There are many researches about literacy,
either financial or media. Nidar and Bestari (2012)
defined personal financial literacy as a competency to
know, understand, and evaluate information about
personal finance.
However, there is no research about zakat literacy
so far. Thus, zakat literacy can be defined as
individual ability to know and understand about zakat
from its definition, type, and zakat management
institution. In simple way, zakat literacy can be
grouped into three groups, basic knowledge about
zakat, zakat calculation, and zakat payment method.
Zakat knowledge comprises of definition of zakat,
types of zakat, time of zakat payment, percentage of
zakat payment. Zakat calculation covers rules to
calculate several types of zakat. Zakat payment
method encompasses identification of zakat
institution (OPZ), payment method, OPZ program,
OPZ right and obligation.
Furthermore, there is no measurement regarding
zakat literacy level. However, there are several
classifications of financial literacy level from
literatures that can be used to classify zakat literacy
level. The Financial Services Authority (OJK)
(2013), classified financial literacy level, particularly
Indonesian, from Financial Literacy Survey 2013 into
four categories namely (1) well literate (21.84%), (2)
sufficient literate (75.69%), (3) less literate (2.06%),
(4) not literate (0.41%). The first category shows
sufficient knowledge and trust about financial
institution and financial services product, includes
features, benefit, risk, right and obligation about
financial product and services, as well as ability to use
financial product and services. The second category
shows sufficient knowledge and trust about financial
institution and financial services product, includes
features, benefit, risk, right and obligation about
financial product and services. The third category
shows knowledge about financial institution and
financial services product. The fourth category shows
no knowledge and trust about financial institution and
financial services product, as well as no ability to
utilize financial services product.
Danes and Hira (1987) and Volpe, Chen, and
Pavlicko (1996) classified financial literacy level into
three category namely (1) more than 80%, (2) 60% to
79%, and (3) below 60%. The first category
represents a relatively high level of financial
knowledge. The second category represents a
medium level of financial knowledge. The third
category represents a relatively low level of financial
knowledge. This classification is formed from the
percentage of respondent correct answer from series
of question about financial literacy.
Several studies about financial literacy among
young people and students show that students lack
knowledge about finance (Chen and Volpe, 1998),
financial literacy level of students are considerably
low (Beal and Delpachitra, 2003), young people has
low financial literacy (Lusardi, Mitchell, and Curto,
2010), comes within the low category, and therefore
needs to be improved (Nidar and Bestari, 2012),
Factors that influence financial literacy can be
categorized as demographic/personal (Chen and
Volpe 1998; Worthington 2006; Beal and Delpachitra
2003), social and economic characteristics
(Worthington, 2006), financial experience (Peng,
Bartholomae, Fox, and Cravener, 2007), level of
education (Lusardi, Mitchell, and Curto, 2010; Nidar
and Bestari, 2012; Sarigul, 2014), economic
condition (Worthington, 2006), and family
characteristics (Lusardi, Mitchell, and Curto, 2010).
The factors that are analyzed are demographic
characteristics, and level of education.
The elements categorized as demographic
characteristics are gender (Beal and Delpachitra,
2003; Chen & Volpe, 1998; Worthington, 2006;
Lusardi, Mitchell, and Curto, 2010), age
(Worthington, 2006; Nidar and Bestari, 2012), and
class rank or level of education in university (Nidar
and Bestari, 2012; Sarigul, 2014).
So far, researches about zakat are talking about
factors that affected obedience of zakat payer, zakat
management by zakat institution (UPZ), and intention
of muzakki to pay zakat. There is no research about
zakat literacy to identify the level of zakat knowledge
and understanding of people, particularly zakat payer.
Hence, this paper aims to measure the level of zakat
literacy of people, especially student of Islamic
Economic Program Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Furthermore, this paper wants to probe about factors
that influenced literacy level such as gender, age, and
knowledge about zakat (class rank in university).
2 METHODS
This research used descriptive quantitative approach,
to understand the zakat literacy level among Islamic
Economics student as well as to determine the factors
that influenced zakat literacy level. The survey was
Zakat Literacy among University Students and Factors Influenced It
147