working ethos is obtained through a good
environment, either in the family or in the school
environment, or even in the social environment. In
line with the aforementioned opinions, Shallcross
(1985) also asserts that an environment has an impact
on the development of a person's ability to be
creative. Through this environment, the interactions
of students in the family and outside of the family can
take place. Therefore, there will be a process of
learning work ethos. Undeniably, creativity is the
result of learning. Accordingly, the work ethos has a
positive correlation with the creativity.
Tisnasomantri, (1995) argues that it is identical with
the excellent people that there is a developed self-
concept. As a result, this concept can make an impact
on their ways of behavior. In particular, this self-
concept consists of idealisms in human life that can
be realized in reality in the forms of thriftiness, hard
work, honesty, and many more. Excellent people are
those who have high creativity. This view is in line
with the view of Isaksen, Puccio, and Treffinger
(Siau, 1995). They say that in order to improve
creativity optimally, the support from the
environment to a particular person should be optimal,
either from the parents, teachers, community, or their
own friends.
Creativity variables can be explained by the work
ethos variable in the number of 15,2%. It indicates
that work ethos is an important variable to be
considered in explaining the creativity variables. In
fact, there are many methods applied in order to
develop and improve work ethos since the work ethos
is regarded as a set of positive behaviors which
originally comes from the fundamental beliefs
accompanied by the total commitment to an integral
work paradigm (Sinamo, 2005). A high work ethos
can be identified from responsibility, rationality,
discipline, thriftiness, productivity, hard work,
futuristic ways of thinking, solidarity tolerance,
cooperation, and social orientation behavior of the
students. If these elements are possessed by the
students, they will be helpful in the improvement of
creativity. Certain communities which have an
advanced cultural value system will have a high work
ethos. In contrary, some other communities which
have a conservative cultural value system will have a
low work ethos, and may even have no work ethos
(Novliadi, 2008: 10).
Based on the above understanding, it can be
assumed that students who have a high work ethos
score will have positive creativity. Therefore, the
work ethos should be improved and it should be more
paid attention by education organizers, either in the
family or school environment. In the light of this
concern, family is the first environment in the
learning process and it is considered as the most
important environment in fostering the work ethos.
As a result, the intensity of interaction and social
contact is supposed to be paid attention (Munandar,
1988). Therefore, the since-birth potential along with
all its shortcomings should be paid attention,
especially in terms of its roles in the interaction with
the environment (Semiawan, 1996).
5 CONCLUSIONS
Serving as the end of the paper, it has been proven
that work ethos in fact has a positive effect on
creativity, the better the work ethos the higher the
creativity of the students. Nevertheless, it is also
found that there are several indicators that must be
maintained and improved. In particular, the indicator
of creativity variables that should be intensively
maintained is the creative product and the one that
should be improved is the creative process. The
indicator of work ethos variable that should be
maintained is the solidarity. On the other hand, the
indicator of work ethos variable that should be
improved is productivity.
REFERENCES
Adiwikarta, S. 1988, Sosiologi Pendidikan Isyu dan
Hipotesis Tentang Hubungan Pendidikan Dengan
Masyarakat. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Amabile, T.M. 1983, The Social Psychology of Creativity.
New York: Springler-Verlag.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Key issues in creativity and
develop- ment. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, J.
Moran, R. J. Stern- berg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura
& M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and
development (pp. 228–229). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Disman, (2004) Efektivitas Pendidikan Ekonomi Dalam
Pembentukan Nilai-nilai Perilaku Ekonomi, Disertasi,
tidak dipublikasikan, Program Pascasarjana Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia.
Gorer, G.1955, Exploring English Character. London: The
Crosset Press. Gorer,
Hornby, A S.1995, Oxford Advanced Learners
Dictionary of Current English(5th ed.); Oxford
University Press, Great Britain.
Leggett, N 2017, Early Childhood Creativity: Challenging
Educators in Their Role to Intentionally Develop
Creative Thinking in Children, Springer
Science+Business Media New York 2017
ICEEE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Economic Education and Entrepreneurship
376