technology. This is shown by eleven business ideas
generated above, of which 9 businesses are related to
production of learning media and 2 businesses are
related to program evaluation services and learning
and teaching products.
4.2 Cycle II
The cycle II of the action research was conducted on
session 12 until session 16 of the course. Students
were given five weeks to make business plan, prepare
for their product design, make the products, and
deliver and exhibit their products at the exhibition
located in campus area. On this second cycle,
lecturers facilitate students to analyze the strength,
weakness, opportunities, and threats to their business,
which are presented in the form of business plan.
Group collaboration in making business plan was
developed well enough, which can be seen from the
quality of business proposals submitted.
Collaboration was also conducted with outside parties
in the form of mutual agreement especially in relation
to production of learning media as products to market.
Group work was chosen over individual work
because Jones and English (2004) found that students
showed less motivation, doubt, and confusion about
working individually on their business plan, which
might be due to the tension of creative process they
should experience. Collaboration helped reduce this
tension and made creative process challenging
instead of stressing. Consequently, students had high
motivation in realizing their businesses and could
develop and execute the business plan appropriately.
In addition, the products created could meet the
expectation of customers.
The business exhibition gained high appreciation
from visitors. Almost all groups sold their products
out and there were several business that got orders
from visitors. The exhibition process was also
evaluated by lecturers and the aspects of evaluation
were creativity, uniqueness, packaging, selling
actions, and cleanliness. In addition, peer assessment
was also conducted to measure individual
contribution and dedication to their group work. As
pointed out by Jones and English (2004), peer
assessment allows students to be aware of the
performance of their contribution to their group in
terms of their communication, coordination and
planning skills which are essential to develop their
capabilities as future entrepreneurs.
The results of cycle II suggest that students are
able to process and understand information related to
entrepreneurship literacy in the field of educational
technology. This is shown by the products exhibited
in the business exhibition, which has successfully
drawn many buyers and prospective customers. This
means that the businesses can keep running even after
the course ends and expect to grow into big business.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The purpose of any literacy program is to reduce the
lack of knowledge, skills, attitudes and capabilities to
perform or undertake an activity. This action research
allowed educational technology students to develop
and enhance their entrepreneurship literacy by first
building their knowledge on entrepreneurship, seize
business opportunities, create and market products
which will eventually develop their entrepreneurship
attitudes, skills, and capabilities.
This action research resulted in mapping of
business ideas, business plans, and business products
in the field of educational technology. Furthermore,
the undertaken entrepreneurship education program
has successfully brought learners to experience the
world of entrepreneurs, which motivated them to
develop their entrepreneurial skills instead of getting
high grades and to continue their business and make
it bigger.
REFERENCES
Ardianti, R. 2009. Entrepreneurship Education in
Indonesia’s Higher Education Institutions: A Solution
for Problems Faced by the Next Generation. In London
International Conference on Education. Taken from
http://repository.petra.ac.id/16848/1/Publikasi1_05001
_1747.pdf
Bustamante. 2014. Developing Entrepreneurial Literacy at
University: A Hands-On Approach. International
Journal of Multidisciplinary Comparative Studies,
Volume 1 No. 2, p. 57—75
Costello, P.J.M. 2003. Action Research. New York:
Continuum.
Dumiyati. 2015. Pendekatan Experiential Learning dalam
Perkuliahan Kewirausahaan Di Perguruan Tinggi untuk
Menghadapi Asean Economic Community (Suatu
Kajian Teoretis). Prosiding Seminar Nasional. p 87-97.
Davidsson, P. 2003. The Domain of Entrepreneurship
Research: Some Suggestions, In Cognitive Approaches
to Entrepreneurship Research. Advances in
Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol.
6; p. 315-372. Ed. Katz, J.A and Shepherd, D.A.
Elsevier Science, Ltd. Oxford UK.
European Commission. 2012. Effects and impact of
entrepreneurship programs in higher education.
Brussels.
Jones, C. and English, J. 2004. A Contemporary Approach
to Entrepreneurship Education. Education + Training,
Vol. 46 No. 8/9, p.416-423. Taken from