PBPU class 3 participants in arrears of premium
compared to other classes illustrates that PBPU class
3 is a group that is still vulnerable or easy to go in
the category/poor category also found in Pujiyanti et
al research on PBPU participants in 10 Provinces of
Indonesia 2015.
Class 1 and 2 restrictions by unscrupulous
officers of health BPJS become a burden for PBPU
participants because they have no choice but to be
inconsistent with the income and financial condition
of the family causing them to default in paying the
premium. Their main reason for purchasing class
fees is higher than their capacity because their
previous experience of showing 3
rd
class health
services is less satisfactory, such as less friendly
healthcare workers and less comfortable treatment
rooms were also found in Pujiyanti's et al research
on PBPU participants in 10 provinces of Indonesia
by 2015
.
Access to limited premium payment channels
such as limited payment places and payment system
disruptions, travelled distance to payment access is
far due to the difficulty of transportation to premium
payers, long travel time so that participants do not
have time because busy with work in the informal
sector so forget, long travelled distance, time
consuming and using public transportation such as
motorcycle taxis and city transportation, causing
expensive transportation costs because their income
below the UMR is the cause of PBPU participants
are not obedient to pay premiums.
In some cases in this study found that
participants PBPU delinquent premiums because
they do not know and forget the due date of
premium payments this is due to the length of time
they do not use health facilities either in the FKTP
and FKTL because their health conditions are good
and healthy are they educated and less
knowledgeable. Not knowing sanctions when
delinquent premium is a factor supporting the
payment of premium not timely. Knowledge of
premium dates and sanctions when late paying
contributions is significantly related to the incidents
of participants in the 2-6 months unemployment
rate, therefore, it is necessary to innovate and
improve the reminder/notification system due date
and the late payment premium. Since both variables
are factors that influence the delinquent premium,
BPJS Kesehatan should be able to innovate in
utilizing technology in order reminder mechanism
more efficient for example through SMS gateway
also found in research conducted by Pujiyanti et al in
2015. In contrast to the research of Mebratie et al.,
2015 that the high understanding and knowledge of
health insurance especially health insurance CBHI is
significantly related to the low number of CBHI
members out of the CBHI insurance scheme in
Ethiopia because they realize that CBHI insurance is
not just for sick people only but healthy people also
need, they also realize that it is not a savings scheme
and their premium will not be returned
.
Poor quality of health care is also one of the
factors causing delinquent paying of premiums such
as long registration booth queues, lack of stock of
drugs resulting in additional costs when using health
care facilities, the finding is in line with previous
findings that factors affecting compliance of pay
premium (in arrears compliance) namely education,
sex, health status, occupation, place of payment,
travelled time and transportation costs and related
knowledge maturity and sanctions when not paying
on.
5 CONCLUSIONS
There are seven factors that cause PBPU participants
in arrears in paying premiums in Baubau City are
socio-demographic categorization because the types
of jobs that are not earning salary with earnings
below the UMR, forgot, dissatisfied with the health
services provided, limited access to premium
payment channels, better health status (Healthy),
class restrictions, health seeking behaviour and
knowledge are the causes of PBPU participants
delinquent paying premiums.
Unpaid-premiums for PBPU participants with
earnings below UMR should be reviewed, the
determination of premiums as mandated in the JKN
roadmap, the government contributes by providing
premium subsidies or PBPU participants who cannot
afford the premiums transferred to participants of
JKN PBI. Premium collectability is enhanced by
various ways such as payment by adjusting the
characteristics of PBPU participants. Socialization
and education need to include stakeholder, cross
sector of program including from community and
private segment
REFERENCES
Alkenbrack, S., Jacobs, B., & Lindelow, M. 2013.
Achieving universal health coverage through
voluntary insurance: what can we learn from the
experience of Lao PDR?. BMC Health Services
Research, 13, pp. 521. Available at
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/521.
Dong, H., De Allegri, M., Gnawali, D., Souares, A., &
Saurborn, R. 2009. Drop-out analysis of community-
based health insurance membership at Nouna, Burkina
Faso. Journal of Health Policy, 5(92), pp.174-179.
Intiasari, A.D. 2014. Model Prediksi Keikutsertaan
Masyarakat Informal Dalam Jaminan Kesehatan Studi
INAHEA 2017 - 4th Annual Meeting of the Indonesian Health Economics Association
86