characteristics such as the mother’s age, race,
income, education, and also the father’s education
level. Information on the purpose of immunisation
for parents from health workers is also considered to
be significant in increasing compliance with
immunisation.
An analysis study by Waluyanti (2009) in Depok
City that aimed to learn the causes and analysis
factors influencing the low coverage rate of
complete immunisation for infants that led to
vulnerability from PD3I diseases found that health
insurance and the response towards immunisation
has a meaningful relationship with compliance with
immunisation.
2.3 The Interaction Model of Client Health
Behaviour/IMCHB
The theories used to understand, predict, and
improve the level of compliance are among other’s
theory of Health belief model, the theory of Planned
Behaviour, and the Transtheoritical Model. Pender
(2004) stated that there is a model theory, namely
The Interaction Model of Client Health
Behaviour/IMCHB proposed by Cox (1984).
Health behaviour can be predicted more easily by
understanding the client’s social-economic status,
the influence of social or community values on the
patient’s health, as well as finance and health
accessibility. The background variables are
considered relatively static ones both in terms of
influence and influencing dynamic variables.
Dynamic variables tend to be more active than the
background variables that include intrinsic
motivation, cognitive assessment, and affectionate
response. The interaction between the client and
health workers involves four factors, namely
information, affectionate support, control of
decision, and skill.
3 METHOD
This is a cross-sectional design research. The
population were all mothers with children in the
susceptible age range of 12-24 months in Bangkalan
District, while the research subject were mothers
registered in UCI and non-UCI Health Centres.
The sampling technique used was Multi-stage
Sampling where Stage 1: Selecting Health Centres
(8 UCI Health Centres and 4 non-UCI Health
Centres); Stage 2: Categorising Health Centres into
3 village groups with 3 categories of UCI coverage
namely A (Good, 80-100%), B (Fair, 70-79.9%),
and C (Poor, <69.9%); and Stage 3: Selecting
villages through Stage 2 that resulted to 36 villages
from 12 Health Centres with 10 respondents each
Centre, which made it 360 respondents in total. The
respondents were determined by using the Snowball
technique and the data analysis used univariate,
bivariate, and multivariate analyses.
The influence of the various variables on the
mother’s compliance with complete child
immunisation was identified through Path Analysis,
which was executed after each variable was analysed
by using a computerised program.
4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The data results of all 360 respondents show that
351 of them (97.5%) take their child for
immunisation and 9 of them (2.5%) do not take their
child for immunisation. The coverage of Child
Immunisation based on the type of vaccine
implemented on schedule is: BCG at 53%, Hepatitis
B0 at 49.6%, Hepatitis B1 at 63.0%, Hepatitis B2 at
47.6%, and Hepatitis B3 amounts to 54.1%.
Meanwhile, coverage of DPT1 is at 49.3%, DPT2 at
58.1%, DPT3 at 47.0% and Measles amounts to
51.3%. Polio1’s coverage amounts to 66.4%, Polio2
at 47.3%, Polio3 at 63.0% and Polio4 is at 56.4%.
Approximately 37.3% of infants have been given
complete immunisation per vaccine type (antigen)
on schedule (compliant). The coverage of complete
immunisation given to infants off schedule or
incomplete immunisation amounts to 62.7%. The
result of immunisation completeness in accordance
with the schedule is basic for the mother’s
compliance level in taking their child for
immunisation.
4.1 Mother’s Characteristics
The mother’s individual aspects being studied in this
paper include motivation, knowledge on
immunisation, and response towards the
immunisation knowledge. The result shows that the
mother’s motivation to take their child for
immunisation is derived from the self-factor
(intrinsic) at 52% and non-self-factor (extrinsic) at
48%. Extrinsic factors included as the source of the
mother’s motivation are family, neighbour, health
worker, and health cadre. The mother’s self-
motivation becomes the determinant factor for them
to take their child for immunisation.