harmony and diversity (McLeod, 2003; Hays and
Erford, 2010; Jennifer et al., 2010). Thus, judging
from the theoretical-philosophical side, the
effectiveness of multicultural counselor training is
likely to be marked by a fundamental human view and
a clear purpose namely facilitating the development
of multicultural competence.
Secondly, in theoretical-contextual perspective,
the effectiveness of multicultural counselor training
in enhancing multicultural competence can happen
because it is supported by strong concept and proper
context understanding through need assessment. For
Ruth and Lien (2013) need analysis in the
development of multicultural competence is a must.
It indicates that the accuracy of multicultural
counselor training assessment should be a guarantee
of effective multicultural competence development,
that is, needs assessment built by the accuracy of
contextual understanding. Based on the bioecological
theory of Bronfenbrenner, known as context theory
(Papalia et al., 2004), it is explained that human
development occurs in the context of ecological
systems that may support or inhibit the development
itself. He suggests that to understand how humans
develop, understand human ecology firstly. This
theory identifies five interconnected contextual
systems, namely microsystems, mesosystems,
ecosystems, macrosystems, and chronosystems.
Based on this context theory, assessment of guidance
and counseling should take which context is believed
to be most influential to the individual into account.
It should be recognized that development is related to
cultural factors (Lago, 2006). Basically, the
implementation of multicultural counselor training is
highly influenced by multicultural guidance and
counseling approach, that bases its practice on the
need of the counseling in accordance with the
uniqueness of its cultural identity development
(Baruth and Manning, 2012).
Thirdly, the effectiveness of multicultural
counselor training in improving all multicultural
competence can be seen from the analysis of its
implementation strategy. Multicultural counselor
training uses four main strategies in its
implementation, namely systematic reflection,
Socratic dialogue, simulation, and cultural
immersion. As it is understood, people are now
almost certainly unable to avoid the problems of
multicultural life related to values and beliefs
(Loewenthal and Snell, 2003). It means that the
current and the future humans who can live worthily
are human being who are willing and able to test their
own values and beliefs, it is called reflection.
Reflection is a self-criticism through a process of
examining the values, beliefs, and personal
experiences done for and by oneself (Morin, 2002;
Yip, 2006). Multicultural competence is full of
values, attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and skills that,
in its development, can be facilitated by the ability
and the intention to do reflection (Toros and Medar,
2015). Therefore, reflection, especially systematic
reflection, is used as the initial strategy of
Professional Counselor Training of multicultural
Counselors in developing multicultural competence.
The systematic reflection of multicultural
competence is the process of assessment, analysis,
internalization, and the initiation of multicultural
competencies done by and/or for oneself. The
systematic reflection of multicultural competence,
actually, is an auto critical action by counselors or
learners of their own multicultural competence.
Systematic reflection in enhancing multicultural
competence is considered to be important because
systematic critical reflection on the development of
multicultural competence is necessary if the
counselor commits to succeed (Sharma et al., 2011;
Bettendorf and Fischer, 2009).
The second strategy used by the multicultural
counselor training is Socratic dialogue strategy, as
one of the six strategies of multicultural guidance and
counseling approaches (Jackson, 2006; Palmer and
Laugngani, 2008; Gladding, 2012). The Socratic
Dialogue is considered to be an appropriate strategy
to facilitate the development of multicultural
competence. It is based on a belief that the Socratic
dialogue in guidance and counseling has been proven
as effective strategy in developing higher order
thinking skills, developing meta cognition, and
improving counselee’s performance (Lam, 2011). In
addition, the Socratic dialogue can be used to clarify
meanings, feelings, and consequences for what have
been understood, believed, and made as solution
(Copeland, 2010). Meanwhile, multicultural
competence is built on attitudes and beliefs,
knowledge, and skills (Hays and Erford, 2010;
Jennifer et al., 2010; Jackson, 2006). So, the Socratic
dialogue is considered to be an appropriate strategy to
be a multicultural guidance and counseling strategy
specially to facilitate the development of attitudes and
beliefs, knowledge, and counselors’/counselees’ in
developing their own multicultural competence. In
turn, their multicultural competence will be based on
higher order thinking skills and firm metacognition,
so that the counselor appears as a professional in
multicultural guidance and counseling and is able to
live in harmony and diversity. If the Socratic dialogue
is really done well in multicultural counselor
professional training, then it almost certainly will