organization, characteristics in the BEM
management organization in Departments and
Universities, characteristics in the community and
social contacts of self-confidence, responsibility,
experience, motivation, independence, and
consistency.
According to BPS (2015), based on population
composition, age is grouped into 3 i.e. age 0-14
years considered as unproductive population group,
population group aged 15-64 years as productive
group and age group 65 years and above as
population group which no longer productive. Age
of respondents is the length of the respondent lives
up to the research done; the student's productive age
will affect the adoption process of a new innovation.
Distribution of student age characteristics based
on the results of research known that 98.00% of
students are in the age range of > 20-22 years. This
shows that most of the respondents are in the
productive age category, the age of the respondent is
related to the innovation, someone at the non-
productive age will tend to be difficult to accept the
innovation, and otherwise someone with the
productive age will be easier and quicker to accept
innovation. This is in accordance with Soekartawi's
(2005) opinion that younger students usually have a
passion for wanting to know what they do not know
yet, so they try to accelerate adoption of innovation
even though they are usually inexperienced in the
matter of adoption of the innovation.
3.2 Design of Recruiting Model of
DIKLAT and PSDM which Have
Feasibility in Increasing
Graduates’ Competence and
Employability
From the description of the general description of
the above mentioned activities, it is ultimately
assumed to increase the high level of employment,
both from the quantity aspect, the quality of PTK-
PNF manpower and even assumed to be a trigger in
encouraging the high level of absorption of
graduates of PLS department by partner institutions,
stakeholders or parties users of other graduates.
The development of the study group program,
designed to apply a multilevel assessment model,
includes preliminary assessment, process
assessment, and final assessment as a follow-up.
Systematically the development of the study group
program was started by assessing the students,
especially in this phase to analyze the needs,
potentials and interests of students to join and
conduct activities in the study group, in this phase as
well as analyzing and reviewing the basic
competencies that have been owned by students,
after further considerations, the design of the PNFI
study group program together with the supervisors,
senior students and alumni elements. The program
that has been compiled is then implemented in the
form of study group activity, in this phase the
assessment of the process of conducting the study
group activities for all fields. Lastly do an
assessment in the framework of obtaining feedback
and follow-up programs that must be implemented
by the study group in one phase or cycle of a
particular activity.
Based on the above description, seen from the
flow of the process of organizing this study group, it
will follow the procedure that begins with the
assessment process and end the follow up of the
program.
From the results of the study on the
implementation of the study group program
developed, the existence of this study group has a
value of excellence in several ways:
Students are taught through systemic, specific
and integrated learning systems and acquire
comprehensive curriculum strengthening, with
proportional weight theory and practice.
Students are taught through varied learning,
whether individual, group, mass with the
highest weight on individual learning (self
directed).
Students are taught through experience
learning cycle, that is, through; exploration of
concepts, further theories directly conduct
testing or experimentation, reflect on his
experience, and formulate new conceptions and
so on.
The process of guiding students through study
groups is done in stages (layered), namely; (2)
through guidance by the coordinator / assistant of
senior students, (3) through the guidance of the
lecturer based on the expertise of the study field, (4)
through the referred technical resource person (s)
and recommended by counselors, in accordance with
individual institutions or expertise in the field of
field studies. Activities and products or study results
from each study group can be input and inventory of
products and activities for departments, faculties and
UPI in improving accessibility of service programs,
partnerships and institutional development itself.
For communities, institutions and target groups,
even practitioners in the field obtain academic
services from students and lecturers through the
implementation of study group programs.