associated with the development of required attitudes,
skills and knowledge. The personal qualities
supported by the creation of a positive therapeutic
alliance include: (a) Flexible and flexible professional
counselors are counselors who can flexibly accept
counsel to deal with the most important issues; (b)
Respect and respect counselees, counselors who have
high respect and respect from others will be able to
remove ambiguity as intrinsic humanity and
interaction with others / the environment; (c) Warm,
friendly and affirmative; (d) Open; (e) Sensitive and
active, is one of the most important requirements for
an effective counseling process. A counselor who has
high sensitivity and active skills will have strong
feelings and views of the counselee, understand the
advice from the field and from an inseparable
perspective from yourself, the counselor can
understand the problem of the character and problems
of the counselee; (f) Be able to demonstrate honesty
through self-reflection; (g) trustworthy trust beliefs
and beliefs and (h) holistic awareness, are the major
components affecting therapeutic alliances,
counselors have an awareness of their beliefs, values
and principles with others, awareness of knowledge
and understanding of one's point of view with others
and the mind has the skills to choose appropriate
counseling strategies according to the characteristics
and problems of the counselee.
Personal counselors are dynamic, which means
that the counselor will continue to evolve with the
dynamics of the environment. The personal integrity
of the counselor is an authentic counselor's image
(Kartadinata, 2013). In encouraging prospective
counselors have personal integrity that includes
developing the attitudes, skills and knowledge well,
an educator must be aware of the mission and create
an atmosphere of learning with a mission that will be
the accomplishment (Kartadinata, 2016).
2.3 Learning a Trajectory Learning
Trajectory is derived from the Latin traicere, to cause
to cross or cross, in the sense of crossing, but
etymologically learning is learning trajectories that
pass or penetrate. Learning trajectory is used to
describe a series of lessons or a trajectory resulting
from participation in learning activities (Strijker,
2010, p. 7). Trajectory Learning will develop
competency levels capable of crossing the highest
competence thinking (Clements and Sarama, 2009a,
p 3; 2009b, p 17). Trajectory Learning will grow
mindset prospective counsellor marked critical
thinking. The design of learning trajectories to
develop higher-order thinking by referring to
Gardner's Five Minds thought trajectory (Gardner,
2008), whereas to traverse learning materials can
refer by using a Socratic dialog strategy.
In the context of self-development, learning the
five-minded collar counsellor as a whole. Some of the
implications of Gardner's learning are five minds
(Gardner, 2008, p. 5). (1) learning that not only be the
delivery of material substance, but rather awakening
an education that facilitates the personal integrity of a
potential counsellor; (2) the personal counsellor is
based on knowledge up to ethical issues; (3) the
personal development of counsellors requires the
integrity of learning across the cognitive, affective,
and psychomotor aspects in a structured and
programmed manner, so that five thoughts can
represent good structures, processes and learning
missions; and (4) learning five unsustainable minds.
In the process of preventing learning materials can
use the strategy of dialog Socratic.
2.4 The Socratic Dialogue as a
Trajectory Learning Method
The Socratic Dialogue is a method that is on learning
done with conversation, debate with the stages of
questions (Ferguson, J, 1974). Dialysis is a structured
dialogue that is energized by dialectic thinking, but
Socrates develops a dialectical way of thinking
through a process of dialogue that has a major
influence on the development of individual attitudes
(Ferguson, J, 1974, so its development is known as
the Socratic dialogue) The basic assumption of
Socratic dialogue is that each individual has the
potential to know the truth, goodness and error (Beck,
H. Robert, 1985; Beck, H. Robert, 1985).
In the context of learning Socrates dialogue is
used as a learning strategy for the development of
high-level thinking with the concept of analogy and
thinking (Hansen, T. David, 1988). According to
Vyskocilova, J and Prasko, J (2012, pp. 36-37) The
process of Socrates dialogue, built on several
principles namely 1) Thinking is not intuitive, is a
way of understanding or searching directly without
any awareness or consideration; 2) The process of
thinking is unfaithful; 3) Realizing dialogue is a form
of process in everyday life; and 4) The purpose of
dialogue as a rule for finding new views.
ICES 2017 - 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences
48