sample groups is no different. Similarly, the lowest
scores and the highest scores did not differ
significantly between the sample groups treated with
those not treated.
3.1.2 Description of Data of Post-test Result
of Social Skill in Elementary School
Students
The post-test social skill data on primary school
students was obtained from the second test result in
both the experimental and control groups in both
populations. In the group given skillastic game
treatment, the questionnaire test was performed after
the sample was given treatment for 12 meetings. As
for the control group, the tests were performed
simultaneously with the experimental group but
were previously given no treatment.
The average post-test result of social skill in
elementary school students of experimental group in
urban area given treatment is 27,381 with standard
deviation 5,244 and variance 27,509. The lowest
score of the treated group was 16, and the highest
score was 36. And experimental group in rural area
is 26,357 with standard deviation 4,858 and variance
23,601. The lowest score is 13 and the highest score
is 35. While the average score of post-test result of
social skill for urban control group in elementary
school students is 25,333 with standard deviation
5,317 and variance 28,276. For the lowest score
obtained by the control sample group was 11 and the
highest score was 35. As well as for control groups
in rural areas is 25.761 with a standard deviation of
4.241 and variance 17.991. For the lowest score
obtained is 18 and the highest score is 37.
The difference in the influence of skillastic game
on social skill development is better than the effect
of learning without skillastic game on social skill
development in elementary school students.
To test this hypothesis used F or Anova test,
because the data to be tested comes from four
different samples.
From the statistical analysis it was revealed that
F observed is 6.251 and the critical value is 2.60.
Since F observed is higher than F critical (6,251 >
2,60), Ho was rejected.
The analysis showed that sig or probability value
is 0,000. Because sig. or probability value is lower
than 0,05 (0,000< 0,05), Ho was rejected. This
means that there is a significant difference from the
average score of social skill development between
the experimental group and the control group in
urban and rural areas.
3.2 DISCUSSION
This research was conducted to get answers from
four problems: What is the influence of skillastic
game on social skill development in both urban and
rural areas.
The result of the research shows that the
influence of skillastic game on social skill
development in elementary school students shows
better result is marked by the enthusiasm of the
students in the game, fun, interaction with each other
compared to the influence of less skillastic game
learning. The results are in accordance with opinions
in the lynx leisure (2010) which says that "skillastic
games teach coordination, cooperation, and
communication.
From the results of field observations in terms of
application of skillastic games in urban and rural
areas. In general both students in urban as well as
rural students have similarities in performing
skillastic game games, all students are enthusiastic,
happy and not a few of the students want to re-
skillastic games, because skillastic games are new
for students in physical education lessons and are
new experiences for students. The results is relevant
to the opinion of Sandy (2010) who said that
Skillastic game games let every child do physical
activity without seeing right or wrong in performing
every move. The philosophy of the game is that
students feel good about skillastic activity, and get
used to healthy lifestyle, and provide benefits
especially for children's fitness and health.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In practice there are differences between students in
urban and rural areas. Students in urban areas do not
take long to understand the motions contained in the
picture. If it is associated with social development
there is a significant increase from before skillastic
game treatment, it is seen from the absence of
students who do not participate, remain silent. All
students work together in their group to complete the
game, compared to the treatment given by many
students who show low social skills such as solitude,
not easy to associate with their friends and feel the
problem when grouped with non-friends. The results
of the study in accordance with the opinion of the
National Association of Sport Psychologists (2002),
"the consequences of students with bad social skills
will show: will have difficulty in interpersonal
relationships with parents, teachers, peers,
depressed, aggressive and anxious behavior.
ICSSHPE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education
78