compared to the control group. Based on the
normality test that the average BDNF plasma level
of Mice (Mus musculus) in the control group,
aerobic and anaerobic physical exercise 1 times a
week, 3 times a week and 7 times a week normal
distribution (p> 0.05).
Then t test is not paired or independent sample
test T-Test to know the significant difference
between aerobic group, anaerobic with control
group. For the aerobic group the result was a
significant difference (p value <0.05) average BDNF
plasma level of Mice (Mus musculus) treated with
aerobic physical exercise 1 x and aerobic 3 x with
control group. There was no significant difference (p
value> 0,05) mean BDNF plasma level of Mice
(Mus musculus) treated with aerobic physical
exercise 7 x with control group.
For the anaerobic group the result was a
significant difference (p value <0.05) mean BDNF
plasma level of Mice (Mus musculus) treated with
anaerobic physical exercise 1 x and anaerobic 3 x
with control group. There was no significant
difference (p value> 0,05) mean BDNF plasma level
of Mice (Mus musculus) treated with anaerobic
physical exercise 7 x with control group.
Then to know which groups are different more
meaningful, then the next test Anova. Anova test
results between aerobic group and control group
showed that there was a significant difference (p
value <0.05) average BDNF plasma of Mice (Mus
musculus) level between aerobic exercise group 1
times a week, 3 times a week, 7 times a week with
Control group.
The results of Anova test between the anaerobic
group and the control group showed that there was a
significant difference (p value <0.05) the mean
BDNF plasma of Mice (Mus musculus) between the
anaerobic physical exercise group 1 times a week, 3
times weekly, 7 times a week with group control.
4.2 Discussion
Based on the above research statement, it can be
concluded that, the mean of plasma BDNF level in
the highest aerobic group is 1 x aerobic group (62,24
± 17,28). While the mean plasma BDNF levels in
the highest anaerobic group were the 3 x anaerobic
group (54.23 ± 7.47). However, plasma anaerobic
BDNF levels of 3 x (54.23 ± 7.47) were lower than
the 1 x azobic group (62.24 ± 17.28). According to
the researchers this happens because the treatment of
physical exercise there are acute and chronic and
depends on the use of exercise intensity, duration of
exercise and recovery period of exercise.
The results of treatment from each group
obtained the average concentration of aerobic
plasma BDNF 1x (62.24 ± 17.28) has a high value
due to aerobic physical exercise is acute. Charles H.
Hillman et al. (2009) suggests that acute exercise
effects improve neurocognitive function and have
the intensity and duration of exercise that improve
the cognitive functioning and nervous system of the
brain. Then the rate decreased in aerobic physical
exercise 3x (58,51 ± 10,76). This happens because
the mice experience a period of recovery or rest
periods. Then the rate decreased again in aerobic
physical exercise 7x (32.53 ± 5.89). This happens
because aerobic physical exercise is chronic. This
exercise is done every day without any recovery
period causing fatigue, dehydration and will reduce
the accuracy in doing physical activity (Flora, 2015:
43). Research Lawrence E. Armstrong et al, (1998)
mentions that the occurrence of fatigue during
physical activity due to various things, namely the
increase in lactic acid in the muscle, homeostatic
disorders, neuromuscular disorders and heat air
temperature.
Then, anaerobic plasma BDNF rate of 1x (45.38
± 4.76) has a high value because the anaerobic
physical exercise is acute. In this exercise there is a
time interval of 1 minute with a speed of 10 meters
per minute of the overall time. This exercise also
usually requires a rest interval so that ATP
(Adenosine Tripospat) can be regenerated so that its
activities can be resumed. Then again increase in
mean of 3 x anaerobic BDNF (54,23 ± 7,47). This
happens because the mice experience a period of
recovery or rest periods. According Cloud Cenedy et
al, (2008) that the intensity of aerobic and anaerobic
physical exercise that can improve physical fitness
and brain function if done routinely at least 3 times a
week. Furthermore, BDNF levels decreased
significantly in anaerobic physical exercise 7 x
(34.36 ± 11.04). This is because the physical
exercise is chronic and done every day without any
recovery period resulting in fatigue, dehydration and
will reduce the accuracy in physical activity (Flora,
2015: 43).
5 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion from this study that physical
exercise resulted in increased levels of Brain
Derived Neurothropic Factor (BDNF) Plasma of
Mice (Mus musculus). This is proven based on
Anova test result which shows that there is a
significant difference (p value <0,05) mean of
Effect of Aerobic and Anaerobic Physical Exercises to Brain Derived Neurothropic Factor Plasma Levels on Mice
213