Further analysis revealed that there was a
significant difference in the traditional game skill
mastery between male students who learned
traditional games using TGFU and male students
who learned traditional games using TGT, with TGT
being more effective in improving traditional game
skill mastery than TGFU. In this respect, Gerdin
(2008) state, “Boys tend to enjoy physical education
in school further up the years compared to the girls.”
4 LIMITATIONS
The main limitations of this research were the small
sample size and the time constraints for students to
participate in the extracurricular activities.
5 CONCLUSIONS
This research has revealed there are different
impacts between TGT and TGFU instructional
model on traditional game skill mastery at the
elementary school level and has determined an
effective instructional model in terms of gender.
REFERENCES
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I.,
Sandford, R., 2009. The educational benefits claimed
for physical education and school sport: An academic
review. Research Papers in Education. 24(1), 1–27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817.
Brody, L. R., Hall, J. A., 2008. Gender and emotion in
context. Handbook of Emotions. 395–408.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2076468
Butler, J. I., 2006. Curriculum constructions of ability:
Enhancing learning through Teaching Games for
Understanding (TGfU) as a curriculum model. Sport,
Education and Society. 11(3), 243–258.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320600813408.
Chaplin, T. M., 2015. Gender and Emotion Expression: A
Developmental Contextual Perspective. Emotion
Review. 7(1), 14–21.
Cheng, A. Y. N., Tang, S. Y. F., Cheng, M. M. H., 2016.
Changing conceptions of teaching: A four-year
learning journey for student teachers. Teachers and
Teaching: Theory and Practice. 22(2), 177–197.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1055437.
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., Meltzoff, A. N.,
2014. Designing Classrooms to Maximize Student
Achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and
Brain Sciences. 1(1), 4–12.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548677.
Cohen, M. T., 2008. The effect of direct instruction versus
discovery learning on the understanding of science
lessons by second grade students. NERA Conference
Proceedings. Paper 30, 2–37.
Dudley, D., Baxter, D., 2013. Metacognitive analysis of
pre-service teacher conception of Teaching Games for
Understanding (TGfU) using blogs. Asia-Pacific
Journal of Teacher Education. 41(2), 186–196.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.777028.
Gutierrez, D., García-López, L. M., 2012. Gender
differences in game behaviour in invasion games.
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 17(3), 289–
301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690379.
Hanover Research, 2014. The Impact of Formative
Assessment and Learning Intentions on Student
Achievement, 16.
Kim, H., Ke, F., 2017. Effects of game-based learning in
an OpenSim-supported virtual environment on
mathematical performance. Interactive Learning
Environments. 25(4), 543–557.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1167744.
Koekoek, J., Knoppers, A., 2015. The role of perceptions
of friendships and peers in learning skills in physical
education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.
20(3), 231–249.
Light, R., Fawns, R., 2003. Knowing the game:
Integrating speech and action in games teaching
through tgfu. Quest. 55(2), 161–176.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2003.10491797
Mogari, D., 2010. Gender differences in the learners’
learning of properties of a rectangle. African Journal of
Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education. 14(3), 92–109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2010.10740694
Oslin, J., Mitchell, S., Griffin, L., 1998. the Game
Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI)
Development and preliminary validation. Journal of
Teaching in Physical Education. 17, 231–243.
Pearson, P., Webb, P., 2008. Developing effective
questioning in Teaching Games for Understanding
(TGfU), Faculty of Education - Papers, (January), 1–9.
Sabin, J. T., 2012. Teacher Morale, Student Engagement,
and Student Achievement Growth in Reading: A
Correlational Study. ProQuest Dissertations and
Theses. 1(1), 136. (online) availabele at:
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1427345297?acco
untid=10673%0Ahttp://openurl.ac.uk/redirect/athens:e
du/?url_ver=Z39.88-
2004andrft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertationa
ndgenre=dissertations+%26+thesesandsid=ProQ:ProQ
uest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Globalanda
Slavin, R. E., 1995. Classroom applications of cooperative
learning. APA educational psychology handbook. Vol
3: Application to learning and teaching., 359–378.
https://doi.org/10.1037/13275-014.
Tan, C. W. K., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., 2012. “How does
TGfU work?”: Examining the relationship between
learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy.
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 17(4), 331–
348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.582486.
ICSSHPE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education
228