![](bg5.png)
goals, both individual goals and objectives of the
team itself. According to Raimy in Burns (1993)
said that "What is believed by a person about
himself is a factor in understanding social towards
other people." Athletes who have a positive self-
concept may accept other people around them,
especially those in direct contact with him. Fey in
Burns (1993), argues that men who accept
themselves high (positive self-concepts) are more
receptive to others, estimating their own popularity
higher than men who accept themselves less.
According to Shaw in Son (2011), asserts that
social interaction is "an exchange of interpersonal
each person shows their behavior to one another in
their presence, and each behavior influence each
other." The concept itself is part of the personality
that affect the quality of social interaction in the
team. Athletes will behave according to the
personality he owns, then the athlete should be able
to customize the personality that included a self-
concept, the state of the team and other athletes so
there is synchronization of each individual.
According to Ahmadi (2009), "The relationship is
about the effort in adjusting and the adjustment can
be by way of so-called autoplastic, that person must
adjust the surrounding environment." Acceptance of
oneself will make individuals better enjoy going to
the reception of surrounding environment. Burns
(1993) says that the self-accepting person views the
world as a more pleasant place than one who rejects
himself and is less defensive towards others and
about himself because of his attitude. Singgih in
Husdarta (2010) points out that, team cohesiveness
is an indispensable force in order to be able to show
the best game. Being a unity in the team, through
good interaction process, become its unique power
to achieve maximum performance.
Anshel (1990) argues that "Coaches should be
aware of the need of most athletes to belong-to
affiliate with other team members." From these
opinions can be concluded that the coach should be
able to control the interaction that occurs between
individuals within the team in order to be a unity. It
can be controlled with the participation of
individuals in building a good social interaction,
thus becoming a dynamic team. The process of
making friends and developing into a cohesive,
supportive group is the best understood as a process
of group dynamics (Anshel, 1990). Dynamic team
will increase the cohesion within his own team and
create an atmosphere that coaches and athletes want
to have, a state where all team members feel
comfortable. It is the formation of the team climate
or constructive climate. By Anshel (1990),
constructive climate is when the atmosphere is
relaxed and nontreatenig, athletes feel more
comfortable in engaging in direct, honest
communications with Reviews their coach and
teammates.
In a dynamic team, each member of the team
aware of the role that should be run. Role according
to Boeree (2010) is shared expectations regarding
the functions in the community. Functions in a team
are shared based on the capabilities and should be
realized individually. By realizing the capability, the
role will be properly carried out. In this case, the
trainer should be able to discuss well about the role
and ability of each athlete. The trainer can control
how the role of each athlete, so as to minimize the
problems that arise. A common problem in a team is
a misunderstanding between each athlete, a matter
that can damage and climate interactions in the team.
The results of this study suggest that there is a
significant relationship between variables with
moderate level of correlation and determination of
small data, it is likely caused by a lack of attention
coaches and athletes on the social aspect, especially
on the concept of self and social interaction team.
The coach or athlete is more focused on the physical
aspects, techniques, and tactical. Therefore, athletes
and coaches themselves must realize the importance
of psychology in the team, especially on the self-
concept of the athletes and social interaction within
the team. It is intended to prevent and deal with the
effects of psychological aspects. Handlers and
prevention can be done through training psychology,
may be the formation of personality or a game of co-
operation in outbound activities that can improve the
cohesion of the group (a feeling shared in a group).
In coaching the self-concept of athletes, coaches,
and trainers should be able to maintain and direct the
self-concept towards the positive way. The steps that
can be done is to find and recognize the negative and
positive things in the athlete, to give direction to be
open to accept the views of others about themselves,
and try to appreciate each effort or the work itself. A
comfortable and pleasant environment can direct the
athlete's self-concept into a positive way.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on processing and analysis of data in this
research, it can be concluded that there is significant
relationship between self-concept of athlete with
quality of the team social interaction. The
Relationship is ranged on the average level of
coefficient correlation.
ICSSHPE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education
412