
 
consumer  satisfaction.  Satisfaction  is  the  feeling  of 
pleasure or disappointment of someone who emerged 
after comparing the provided performance of service 
to the expected (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2012, Kotler & 
Keller 2014).  
Meanwhile,  A  Parasuraman,  Zeitham  and  Berry 
(1985)  proposed  a  conceptual  model  of  consumer 
expectations  for  services.  The  model  identified  ten 
major  determinants  of  consumer  expectations.  The 
ten  determinants  are  :  enduring  service  intensifiers, 
personal  needs,  transitory  service  intensifiers, 
perceived service alternatives, self-perceived services 
roles,  situational  factors,  explicit  service  promises, 
implicit service, word of mouth, and past experiences, 
To measure service performance A Parasuraman, 
Zeithaml and Berry (1985) introduced service quality 
dimensions. These dimensions need to be considered 
carefully by service provider, so that consumers get 
the  performance  of  services  in  accordance  with 
expectations.  The  service  quality dimensions  which 
often  used  in  research  are  the  five  dimensions  of 
service  quality,  which  consists  of:  reliability, 
responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangibles. 
Reliability is the ability to perform the promised 
service dependably and accurately. Responsiveness is 
the willingness to help customers and provide prompt 
service.  Assurance  is  knowledge  and  courtesy  of 
employees  and  their  ability  to  convey  trust  and 
confidence.  Empathy  is  caring,  individualized 
attention  the  firm  provides  its  customers.  While 
tangible  is  appearance  of  physical  facilities, 
equipment, personnel, and communication materials. 
While,  Mittal  &  Lassar  (1998)  found  that 
satisfaction  is  driven  more  by  “technical  quality” 
(the  quality  of  the  work  performed)  than  by 
“functional  quality”  (how  the  service  work  was 
delivered); however, once satisfaction is achieved, 
loyalty  is  driven  more  by  functional  than  by 
technical  quality.  This  is  the  pattern  of  influence 
for  a  “low  contact”  (where  customers’  direct 
contact  with  service  providers  is  absent  or 
marginal) service. For a “high contact” service, the 
pattern  of  influence  is  exactly  the  reverse.  Of 
significant  importance  to  service  managers,  the 
paper  explains  the  dynamics  of  loyalty  versus 
satisfaction  and  derives  their  managerial 
implications. 
Ganguli  &  Roy  (2011)  proposed  four  generic 
service  quality  dimensions  in  the  technology‐
based  banking  services  –  customer  service, 
technology  security  and  information  quality, 
technology  convenience,  and  technology  usage 
easiness and reliability. It was found that customer 
service  and  technology  usage  easiness  and 
reliability have positive and significant impact on 
customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. It was 
also  found  that  technology  convenience  and 
customer satisfaction have significant and positive 
impact on customer loyalty. 
Service quality influences relative attitude and 
satisfaction,  satisfaction  influences  relative 
attitude, repurchase,  and recommendation  but has 
no  direct  effect  on  store  loyalty.  Fostering 
favorable relative attitude and getting customers to 
recommend  the  product  or  service  holds  key  to 
fostering  store  loyalty.  Results  also  indicate 
support  for  Oliver’s  four‐ stage  cognitive‐
affective‐ conative‐ action  model  of  loyalty 
(Sivadas & Baker‐ Prewitt, 2000). 
Measuring  customer  satisfaction  is  very 
important, customer satisfaction indexes as a base for 
new  strategic  marketing  management  (Karolina 
Ilieska, 2013). Y.Hu (2011) found that relationships 
between perceived  value, customer satisfaction, and 
purchase intention. While H  Singh (2006) indicated 
that  there  is  also  a  positive  connection  between 
customer satisfaction, loyalty and retention.  Selnes, 
(1993) suggested that companies should monitor and 
improve  both  customers  satisfaction  and  brand 
reputation. 
In order to measure customer satisfaction Kotler 
& Keller  (2014)  identified four  methods,  including: 
complaints and feedback system, mystery shopping, 
lost  costumer  analysis,  and  consumer  satisfaction 
survey. 
3  METHODS 
This  is  an  exploratory  research  method.  Customer 
survey  is  the  main  method  to  collect  primary  data. 
Non-probability  sampling  was  used  to  select 
respondent  and  respondent  are  customer  of  Islamic 
bank.  To  determine  factors  influencing  customer 
satisfaction,  confirmatory  factor  analysis  is  used, 
followed by measuring the customer  satisfaction by 
calculating customer satisfactory index.  
4  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
To  determine  what  factors  influencing  customer 
satisfaction  of  Islamic  Banking,  factor  analysis  is 
used to data that has been collected through survey. 
Factor analysis with the help of SPSS 17 followed the 
process of testing the adequacy of data onto Kaiser-
Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value measurement and by the 
measure of sampling adequacy (MSA) for subsequent 
calculated  Eigen  value  (loading  factor).    Based  on 
Eigen  values  of  the  51  indicators,  12  groups  were 
obtained which has Eigen value of more than 1.00. 
ICIEBP 2017 - 1st International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business and Philanthropy
252