2.3 Smart Tourism in Geopark
In the digital era, urban construction and development
involving ICT in its various aspects, which is often
known as the concept of smart city. The concept of
smart cities is usually associated with embedded
ecosystem technology that seeks to build Synergies
with their social components in an effort to improve
the quality of life and improve the efficiency of urban
services (Eager, 2013 on Buhalis and Amaranggana
2013). Smart tourism is aim to make use of
technology embedded environmental, process
responsive on level micro and macro, end-user
devices in some touch-points and stakeholders
interests involved the use of a dynamic platform as
system nerve (Buhalis and Amaranggana 2013). Aim
main from application aim smart travel is for improve
experience for traveler do travel and for improve
effectiveness management asset destination tourism
is concerned, to ensure that power competitiveness
aim and satisfaction traveler could have monitored on
constantly.
Based on Buhalis and Amaranggana (2013), there
is three ICT forms an important for set up destination
tourism clever, there are Cloud Computing, Internet
of Things and End-User Internet System Service.
3 METHODOLOGY
This research was conducted by using a marketing
approach, particularly smart tourism model through
event Ciletuh Geopark. The research method used is
survey method that is research method conducted on
large and small population, Questionnaires are used
to obtain an overview of the event that have multiple
indicators and also about respondents' opinions about
smart tourism. Data collected consists of two types,
namely primary data and secondary data. The
population in this study is from the data obtained,
obtained data on the number of visitor online site
Ciletuh Geopark until 2016 is 5.954 people (Geopark
Ciletuh Palabuanratu, 2017).
Sampling is done by random sampling Ciletuh
method, number of people who have accessed Global
Geopark online site. The sample in this study is 100
online site visitors Ciletuh Geopark. In line with the
objectives of the study, the data analysis is done
through several stages: d data compilation, data
tabulation, descriptive analysis of each research
variable after the data collected, study literature and
field survey and measure smart tourism through event
marketing of Ciletuh Geopark based on Perceptions
of respondents.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Several events in the region which held in Ciletuh
following is as wrong one way for promote image
brand Geopark Ciletuh. As for some event marketing
is done Ciletuh Geopark Festival "Exploring Ciletuh"
2015 Ciletuh Sabilulungan 2016 Amazing Geopark
Adventure Tourism "Cimaja Geosurf Challenge "in
2017, Ciletuh Geopark Festival "Earth, Wind and
Culture" in 2017.
Most of the respondents that is visitor’s geopark
visit in the event geobike (54%). While percentage
Lowest event visit geopark is geokite and geosurf,
only about 2% of tourists visiting at the event. The
frequency respondent’s visitors geopark visit to event
geopark in part big only 1x within 1 year (74%).
While only 7% who visited 2-3 times in one year.
Partly respondents’ visitors’ geopark is man that is by
71% and 29% is women. There is a big range age
respondent visitors geopark is on aged 26-34 years
(51%), and only 5% range age 35-43 years. that work
visitors in the event the geopark this in part big is
employees private (67%) while respondents with
work employee’s government have percentage
Lowest that is by 1%.
Product event, some big respondents visitors
geopark (76.2%) rate that a given event by EO not
interesting, there is no respondents agreed that the
event is held the Interesting. in part big respondents
visitors geopark (72.3%) rate that a given event by
EO no much was done in the geopark ciletuh (not
agree), and only about 1% of respondents felt that
many at all events in the geopark ciletuh. as much as
68.3% of respondents’ visitors geopark rate that
visitors at this event no corresponding with
personality (not agree) and only about 2% who agree
corresponding with personality. More than half
respondents visitors geopark (53.5%) rate that
location events held by EO no strategic so give
assessment no agree and only 2% of respondents felt
that very agree that the event is held the its location
strategic.
Related to communication marketing, as many as
76.2% of respondents’ visitors geopark rate that
advertising event held Event Organizer geopark not
interesting and give assessment no agree and in this
no respondents agreed that advertising events held the
Interesting. Most of the respondents’ visitors geopark
(66.3%) rate EO imagery constructed event yet too
good in the eyes respondents and given assessment
don’t agree with. Besides that, only 1% of
respondents were very agree that image of the event
was very good in the eyes respondents.
ICIEBP 2017 - 1st International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business and Philanthropy
540