maintain corporate investment development to
achieve corporate objectives.
In addition, the existence of investment
expenditure by the company can provide a positive
signal (good news) for investors, that the company
has good revenue growth in the future and can
increase the shareholder’s prosperity. This makes
investors more interested and trust with company’s
prospect, so that investors more appreciate the value
of the company’s stock and firm value will be higher.
The results of this study support previous research
conducted by Mursalim et al. (2015), Efni et al.
(2012), Prapaska and Muthmainah (2012), Clementin
and Priyadi (2016), Wijaya et al. (2010), Alipudin et
al. (2014) which state that investment decision have a
positive influence on firm value.
5.2 The Influence of Financing
Decision on Firm Value
Financing decision variable has t-statistic is 52.23166
with significance level 0.0000. the t-statistic value >
t-table is 1,66277, then hypothesis 2 is accepted, so
the financing decision has a positive influence on firm
value. The financing decision has a coefficient of
0.371385, meaning that if the financing decision
increases by one unit, then firm value will increases
by 0.371385 units.
The positive influence of financing decision on
firm value is suspected by debt usage can be used as
a deduction of tax payment. In addition, high debt
usage is a positive signal for investors that the
company is able to fund all of its investment activities
and expected to improve the company’s prospects and
be able to pay its obligations to shareholders, so that
the prosperity of shareholders or firm value increases.
In trade-off theory, using debt can increase firm
value to a certain optimum point, but if the amount of
debt has exceeded the optimum point then the debt
can reduce firm value. Based on the results of this
research and trade off theory, it can be seen that
financing decision applied by the average company of
basic industry and chemical sector has not reached its
optimum point, so that financing decision on the basic
industry and chemical sector has a positive influence
on the firm value. The results of this study support
previous research by Wijaya et al. (2010), Hoque et
al. (2014), Mursalim et al. (2015), Himawan and
Cristiawan (2016), Chowdhury and Chowdhury
(2010), Efni et al. (2012) and Rehman (2016) which
states that financing decision has a positive influence
on firm value.
5.3 The Influence of Dividend Policy on
Firm Value
Dividend policy variable has t-statistic of -4.267418
with significance level 0.0001. The significance level
< α 0.05 then hypothesis 3 is accepted, so dividend
policy has an influence on firm value, but the
influence indicates a negative effect. Dividend policy
has a negative coefficient of -0.036038 it means that
if the dividend policy increases by one unit, then firm
value will decreas by 0.036038 units.
The negative influence in dividend policy variable
is assumed that the high dividend payout can cause
the less amount of retained earnings. It may cause the
company have insufficient funds experience to
funding its investment and operational activities in
the future. Increased dividends can be bad news
because it is suspected that the company has reduced
its investment plant which will subsequently affect
the investor’s perspective on firm value (Haruman,
2008). Investors assume that the greater dividends are
distributed to shareholders, the growth of investment
will be hampered and can lower firm value. In
addition, the tax preference theory states that
investors prefer if the company retained the profits,
because dividend income is taxed higher than capital
gains and the capital gain can make investors delay
the payment of taxes, because the tax of capital gains
will be collected if the shares are sold, but the tax of
dividend must be paid when the dividend is
distributed.
Dividend policy in one side may reduce investor
risk, but in other side a higher dividend policy can
reduce the amount of retained earnings. The result of
this study support previous research by Clementin
and Priyadi (2016) and Haruman (2008) which states
that the dividend policy has an influence on firm
value with a negative influence.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results in this research, it can be made
the following conclusions: (1) Investment decisions
has a positive influence on firm value. (2) Financing
decision has a positive influence on firm value. (3)
Dividend policy has an influence on firm value with
a negative direction. Further research is suggested to
examine other sectors or use different analytical
techniques and consider external factors that may
affect firm value, such as interest rates, inflation rate,
currency exchange rate, and others as an independent
variable.
ICIEBP 2017 - 1st International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business and Philanthropy