![](bg8.png)
7 CONCLUSIONS
In order to establish social order in Madiun which
has cohesiveness and national unity, FKUB (Forum
Kerukunan Umat Beragama) plays strategic role in
three different elements of environment. Firstly, the
element related to the basis of laws in maintaining
inter-religious harmony. Secondly the element
related to government policy and a number of
problems in the implementation, and third, the
society’s support and participation. These three
elements support one another to maintain religious
cohesiveness which in turn, become the crucial
elements to realize religious harmony and national
unity. In order to strengthen national integrity and
suppress the potential conflict caused by different
perspective related to SARA, there are some
activities should be performed: training,
workshop/seminar, education and technical training
among the FKUB cadres and the socialization of
regulation rule associated with inter-religious
tolerant and improvement of inter-religious
solidarity.
The implications for future research will be
better if examined deeper about the role of many
evolving religious organizations in Madiun. Because
basically FKUB itself is formed from various
members of religious organizations and social
organizations in Madiun.
REFERENCES
Amir, Syafruddin., 2013. Pancasila as integration
philosophy of education and national
character. International Journal of Scientific &
Technology Research. 2.1 54-57.
Baidhawy, Z., 2007. Building harmony and peace through
multiculturalist theology‐based religious education:
an alternative for contemporary Indonesia. British
Journal of Religious Education. 29(1), 15-30.
Brewer, M. B., 1999. The psychology of prejudice:
Ingroup love and outgroup hate?. Journal of social
issues. 55.3. 429-444.
Charlene, T., 2008. Creating ‘good citizens’ and
maintaining religious harmony in Singapore. British
Journal of Religious Education. 30:2, 133-142.
Creswell, J. W., 2008. Educational Research (Planning.
Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and
Qualitative Research), Pearson (Sage Publications).
California.
Dahrendorf, R., Frank, F., Hayman, C., 1995. Report on
wealth creation and social cohesion in a free
society. The Commission on Wealth Creation &
Social Cohesion. Londres.
De Juan, A., Jan, H. P., Johannes, V., 2015. The Pacifying
Effects of Local Religious Institutions: An Analysis
of Communal Violence in Indonesia. Political
Research Quarterly. 68.2 (2015): 211-224.
Stanley, D., 2003. What Do We Know about Social
Cohesion: The Research Perspective of the Federal
Government's Social Cohesion Research Network.
The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers
canadiens de sociologie. 28(1): 5-17
Fealy, G., 2004. Islamic radicalism in Indonesia: The
faltering revival?. Southeast Asian Affairs. 104-121.
Forsyth, D. R., 2010. Group dynamics, Cengage Learning.
Furnivall, J. S., 1967. Netherlands India: A study of plural
economy, Cambridge University Press.
Geertz, C., 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic
Group. New York.
Gershman, J., 2002. Is Southeast Asia the second
front?. Foreign affairs. 60-74.
Gus Dur, 2001. Menggerakkan Tradisi: esai-esai
pesantren, PT LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
Hefner, R. W., 2002. Global violence and Indonesian
Muslim politics. American Anthropologist. 104.3
754-765.
Hicks, J., 2014. Heresy and authority: understanding the
turn against Ahmadiyah in Indonesia. South East
Asia Research. 22.3 (2014): 321-339.
Hosen, N., 2005. Religion and the Indonesian constitution:
a recent debate. Journal of Southeast Asian
Studies. 36.3 419.
Irwan, M., 2011. Berislam Secara Toleran, Teologi
Kerukunan Umat Beragama, Mizan. Bandung.
Moody, J., White, D. R., 2003. Structural cohesion and
embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social
groups. American Sociological Review. 68(1): 103–
127.
Jeannotte, S., 1997. Social Cohesion Research Workplan.
SRA-266. Strategic Research and Analysis,
Department of Canadian Heritage. Ottawa.
Kang, G. E., 1976. Conflicting loyalties theory: a cross-
cultural test. Ethnology. 15.2. 201-210.
Karagiannis, E., Clark, M. C., 2006. Hizb ut-Tahrir al-
Islami: Evaluating the threat posed by a radical
Islamic group that remains nonviolent. Terrorism
and Political Violence. 18.2 315-334.
Lombard, D., 1996. Nusa Jawa Silang Budaya,
GramediaPustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Mochtar, M., Colin, M. A., 2000 Perbandingan Sistem
Politik, Gadjah Mada. University Pres. Yogyakarta.
Munabari, F., 2017. Reconciling sharia with “Negara
Kesatuan Republik Indonesia”: The ideology and
framing strategies of the Indonesian Forum of
Islamic Society (FUI). International Area Studies
Review. 20, (3), 242 – 263.
Nasikun, 2007. Sistem Sosial Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo
Persada. Jakarta.
Parekh, B., 2001. Rethinking Multiculturalism, Harvard.
Rawls, J., 1972. A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press. Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Ricklefs, M. C., 1992. Unity and disunity in Javanese
political and religious thought of the eighteenth
ICSE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education
164