This assumption is based on the social circle
theory, in which each individual will be attached to
the nearest circle in a particular society (Pachur et al.,
2005). In some contexts, a person lives in a condition
with his or her status, family, religion, residence,
work environment, age, culture. As a whole, it can be
defined that the social circles as the suppressors for
individuals are used to determine the choices and
political decisions in the general election (Armingeon
and Schädel, 2015).
Based on the results of this present study, it is
obvious that there is a great influence from the family
environment. The influence is based on the political
preferences of the mother dan father. Therefore, it
will create a certain political preference towards the
children specifically and the family generally
(Pomper, 1978).
Similar to the surrounding environment, the
membership of elderly people in a social group, either
in a formal level (the membership of elderly people
in a religious or professional organization and
occupational group) or non-formal (friendship, small
groups) can influence their political views and
behaviors. From this group there can be interactions
and discussion that can ultimately influence the
political attitude of the elderly people. As an
illustration, a close correlation between religion and
voter behavior can always be found in which the
religious values are always present in private and
public life of Indonesian society.
In this era, media are considered as one of the
vital means of influencing the views and political
behaviors of the society (Diehl et al., 2016), including
the elderly people. Mass media is regarded as a means
of conveying the messages from the sources to the
public through the mediation of communication
media, such as newspapers, radio, and television.
Based on the results of this study, it is clear that the
mass media has become one of the important means
for the elderly in deciding the political views and
choices. During the general election, mass media has
significant roles, such as: (1) a means of socialization
of the General Election. It aims to improve people's
understanding and knowledge of the correct phases of
general election. In addition, mass media also
provides more information on the existing ways and
rules of election. Therefore, it can minimize the
occurrence of errors during the general election; (2)
one form of fair publication. Precisely, it also
provides the voters with the understanding on
publication processes by publishing the information
as a whole regarding the candidates participating in
the general election.
5 CONCLUSIONS
It can be concluded that the determinant factor of the
formation of political choice, elderly people does not
get fair treatment and discriminatory, especially in
political rights. As we know there are political rights
that can be obtained by elderly people in the general
election. Therefore, the government should uphold
the principal of justice to establish a democratic
system of government.
REFERENCES
Amudsen, I., 2016. Democratic dynasties? Internal party
democracy in Bangladesh. Party Politics. 22(1), 49-58.
Armingeon, K., Schädel, L., 2015. Social Inequality in
Political Participation: The Dark Sides of
Individualisation. West European Politics. 38(1), 1–27.
Bartels, L. M., 2012. The Study of Electoral Behavior, in
Jan, E. L., The Oxford Handbook of American Elections
and Political Behavior, Oxford University Press.
Oxford.
Brender, A., Drazen, A., 2013. Elections, leaders, and the
composition of government spending. Journal of Public
Economics. 97(1), 18–31.
Dalton, R. J., 2002. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and
Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies,
Chatham House Publishers. New York.
Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., Gil, Z. H., 2016. Political
persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect
effects of news use and social interaction. New Media
and Society. 18(9), 1875-1895.
Gunther, R., Diamond, L. J.. 2003. Species of Political
Parties: A New Typology. Party Politics. 9(2).
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hyde, S. D., Jablonski, R. S., 2014.
When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?
British Journal of Political Science. 44(1), 149–179.
Nanou, K., 2012. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage:
How Parties Organize Democracy. West European
Politics. 35(5), 1211–1212.
Pachur, T., Rieskamp, J., Hertwig, R., 2005. The Social
Circle Heuristic: Fast and Frugal Decisions Based on
Small Samples. Proceedings of the 26
th
Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Mahwah.
1077-1082.
Pomper, G., 1978. Voter’s Choice: Varieties of American
Electoral Behavior, Dod, Mead Company. New York.
Qi, Y., Roth, L., Wald, J. K., 2010. Political rights and the
cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics. 95(2).
Stokes, S. C., 1999. Political Parties and Democracy.
Annual Reviews of Political Science, 2(1), 243-267.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 13 Tahun 1998
tentang Kesejahteraan Lanjut Usia.
Valentini, L., 2012. Human Rights, Freedom, and Political
Authority. Political Theory. 40(5), 573–601.
Warren, M. E., 2013. Citizen representatives.
Representation: Elections and beyond. 269.