person. In that family one is raised, lives, interacts
with one another and formation of values, patterns of
thought, and habits. The family also serves as a
selection of all outside cultures, and the dimensions
of the child's relationship with his environment.
Therefore, the family is a social institution that
has multi-function, in fostering and developing
interaction among family members. The family is a
parenting tool for children to learn religious, norms,
values and customs used in the society. Parenting can
be defined as the pattern of behavior that parents
apply to their children, through direct or indirect
interaction, whether it is supportive or inhibiting
children, in all exploration and commitment activities
to achieve their identity status (Ulfiah, 2016).
The interaction between parents and children
applied in the family greatly influence on the
formation of the child's personality. By the interaction
applied by the parents, children will recognize,
understand and comply the norms, values used in
their society (Hurlock, 1980).
Every family has different parenting style. This
nurturing style will affect children to adolescence in
their growth and development.
Parenting style is how parents provide treatment
in caring for their children. The treatment is done
through a continuous interaction between parent and
child, until the child becomes an adult.
Hauser in Archer (1994) divides nurturing into
two styles: enabling and constraining. Enabling is an
open parenting style that supports the child's
psychosocial development. This is not because the
nurturing style encourages family members to
express their thoughts and responses.
This nurturing style has two components
cognitive and affective. Cognitive enabling parenting
style includes: a). Parents willing to involve their
children in problem solving, b). Parents participating
in the exploration of their child's wishes, c). Parents
who give their children the opportunity to express
their views to other family members.
Constraining, on the other hand, is a form of
parenting style that is closed and inhibits the child's
psychosocial development. This nurturing style has
two components cognitive and affective. The
cognitive style in constraining parenting covers; a)
Parents not willing to involve their children in
problem solving, b). Parents not participating in their
children curiosity, and c). Parents who do not give
their children the opportunity to express their views
to other family members. The affective components
are Parents who are ignorant to other family
members, and b). Parents overestimating other family
members.
When looking at each component of the parenting
style, it can be understood that basically both forms
of parental treatment can be positioned on the positive
side (enabling) and negative (constraining).
In that connection, there are some researchers who
have done research using an enabling-constraining
parenting style in relation to the development of
healthy teen personality. They have managed to
identify teenagers who are raised in a family that
applies enabling parenting styles to show a high
psychological development score (without specifying
the aspect of psychological development). Compared
to those raised in constraining parenting style
(Steinberg, 1993).
Research conducted by Darmawan and Endang
(2016), attempts to test several hypotheses: (1) there
are different styles, dimensions, and identity status
between boys and girls; (2) there are differences in
style, dimensions, and identity status between the
early, middle, and late teens; (3) there is a relationship
between identity styles (informative, normative, and
delay-dodge) and the dimensions of identity
(commitment, in-depth exploration, and commitment
review); and (4) there is a relationship between
identity style (informative, normative, and delay-
dodge) and identity status (diffusion, foreclosure,
moratorium and achievement).
In the midst of the progress of science and
technology increasingly rapidly influenced by the
current reform era, the challenge for the development
of aspects of human life will be felt even harder for
the development of a healthy individual personality,
the process of a long development, even has started
since someone is born. In connection with the
development of a healthy personality, Erikson (1980)
has developed a theoretical framework better known
as the theory of psychosocial development stages.
Erikson (1968) offers eight stages of psychosocial
development, the stages contain conflict between 2
(two) outcomes (outcomes). These conflicts are
nothing but social crises or major developmental
problems which are then referred to as the stages in
question. If the conflict is successfully resolved in a
constructive and satisfactory manner, then positive
qualities will penetrate into the ego that will
ultimately enable the individual to achieve healthy
development. But if the conflict is not resolved or
imperfectly resolved, then the developing ego will be
threatened given the negative qualities will be
absorbed into the structure of individual personality.
One of the phases of psychosocial development that
is seen as a key to achieving healthy personality
development is the conflict between Identity vs.
Identity Diffusion that is chronologically on-going
ICSE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education
418