ready-to-find and gain employment, as well as a
special qualification that groups people with the
highest SES of the lowest SES. Lareau (2003) speaks
to the idea of integrated cultivation, in which middle-
class parents take an active role in the education and
development of their children using the control of
organizing activities and fostering a sense of rights
through discussion. Lareau (2003) argues that low
income families do not participate in this movement,
causing their children to have a sense of constraint. A
division in educational attainment is thus born out of
two differences in child rearing. In theory, low-
income families have unsuccessful children to the
level of middle-income children, who feel entitled,
are argumentative, and more prepared for adult life
(Lareau, 2003)
Poverty is not a curse for adults but for children as
well even more. These are the children who are easily
victimized by hunger, growth, illness, physical and
mental disability, harassment, early marriage, child
trafficking, and others. These are environmental
factors that contribute greatly to children living in
poverty being four times more likely to have learning
disabilities than non-poverty students (Apple & Zenk
1996). According to (Casanova, Garcia-Linares,
Torre, & Carpio, 2005), it is a combination of
environmental factors as well as family influences
that contribute to student academic success. Children
who come from poverty are not provided the same
tools as the rich, they have entered the school behind
those who do not live under the same conditions.
Some studies have shown that problems start with
parents and lack of education and understanding of
the needs of children.
This article is based on a study, which is an
attempt to explore various factors that have an impact
on achievement, depending on the different
socioeconomic status in society and how it impacts
on student academic achievement. This study also
examines the literature to reveal that the
socioeconomic status of parents can significantly
contribute to the achievement of good grades in
college. This paper illustrates the impact of income,
employment on the level of student education, and the
impact of many socioeconomic indicators on
individual student achievement.
Based on the above background, the researcher is
interested in investigating the comparison between
the academic achievement of Bidikmisi students and
the Independent students measured through the
academic achievement index (GPA) during the
lecture period.
2 METHODS
This research was a quantitative research. The object
of this research were undergraduate students
majoring in Sociology in one of the University in
Bandung. The population of this study was all
students of sociology consisting of 120 students. The
sample were as many as 30 students, consisting of 21
female and 9 male students. Their age ranged from 18
to 21 years old. Parent income ranges from less than
Rp. 5,000,000 to more than Rp. 5,000,000. The
number of students from Bidikmisi program were 10
people while the students through Independent were
20 people. The sampling used a purposive sampling
as the study involved students with certain criteria of
having background of university entrance through
Bidikmisi scholarship and Independent path. The data
werfe obtained from closed questionnaire with the
number of questions 15 items.
In this study, the calculation of data using Likert
scale which aims to compare the score of
understanding, describe and measure the extent to
which the entrance point of students to the University
with academic achievement. The data analysis
technique used inferential statistic calculation
through non parametric comparative analysis of t-test.
This analysis was chosen because this research seeks
to illustrate the clear comparison between the two
understandings between the entry point and the
academic achievement. The calculation begins with
performing coding from the shared questionnaire,
testing the validity of the data from the coding results,
testing the reliability, and calculating data analysis
using t-test calculation. The calculation was chosen to
prove the test of research hypothesis that is:
Ho: There is no comparison between student
achievement of Bidikmisi and Independent.
H1: There is a comparison between student
achievement level of Bidikmisi and Independent.
3 RESULT
The difference of academic achievement level
between Independent and Bidikmisi students with
significant value 0.01 <0.05 indicates that the data is
not homogeneous. The value of t obtained 2.81 at df
28. The value of t obtained is compared with t table
on df 28 with probability 0.05 that is equal to 1.70.
So, the value of t obtained was 2.81 which was higher
than t table of 1.70. Thus, the value of t arithmetic was
positive. There was a significant difference regarding
ICSE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education
554