Figure 5: The process of regeneration failure.
The family arena affects the generation of
children in deciding whether to continue or refuse to
continue making pottery. In the old days, the
economic capital in the pottery industry is quite
stronger because it becomes the main source of
family livelihood. Social capital among business
networks is well maintained. Both between
craftsmen, traders, and suppliers of raw materials.
The existing cultural capital that time is still strong,
namely togetherness on helping production and
merger of product. They believed that pottery is a
knowledge that must be passed from one generation
to another. The symbolic capital showed by social
position and class that distinguishes between one unit
of pottery industry one and another.
Habitus makes pottery in every family unit into
the field worthy of being at stake. Therefore, pottery
is still considered important in the family, but the
conditions of social domains and practices are
changing. External conditions in the family, not
always static. The pottery began to experience crisis,
the economic capital in each business unit underwent
a decline in turnover. Meanwhile, social capital
between crafters, broker, and seller of raw materials
increasingly tenuous due to economic capital.
Symbolic capital began to change, pottery experience
degradation because it is seen as a job that does not
profit. The new orientation of culture makes pottery
increasingly not firmly held in the family. Because of
these conditions, children do not fully absorb the
culture as a whole (internalization).
In the generation of children, the capital and the
habitus that is formed from the family is very
different from the generation of parents. This
condition is also influenced by the generation of
children outside the core family, such as education,
peers, and social environment of society.Child capital
in the economic field has more networking power in
other sectors. Children get more results by pursuing
other work. In addition, work on other sectors is
considered more proud that social capital in the
generation of children is no longer narrow. Culture
makes pottery increasingly abandoned. Thus, the
pottery is no longer continued. The apparent
condition of the process is the failure of regeneration.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Social practices that occurred in the failure of
regeneration of pottery of Paseban Village occurred
through changes in the accumulation of habitus,
capital, and field in the community. Nevertheless, the
use of Bourdieu's social practices does not place an
important element of time. Time is an important
element that can be used to explain the social changes
that affect the habitus, capital, arena. It is even
possible that the capital and arena undergo changes
that then affect social habits and practices.
REFERENCES
Ali, V. E. 2014. A Critical Survey of the Growth, Decline,
and Sustainability of Traditional Pottery Practice
among the Igbo of South Eastern Nigeria. The Journal
of Modern Craft, 7, 123-139.
Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. 1992. An invitation to reflexive
sociology.
Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research
Design, Choosing Among Five Approaches, Second
Edition. Sage Publication: USA
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. S. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative
Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Grenfell, M. 2008. Pierre Bourdieu Key Consepts. UK:
Acumen Publishing Limited
Karnanta, K. Y. 2013. Paradigma Teori Arena Produksi
Kultural Sastra: Kajian Terhadap Pemikiran Pierre
Bourdieu. Poetika : Jurnal Ilmu Sastra, 1(1).
Nash, R. 1990. Bourdieu on Education and Social and
Cultural Reproduction. British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 11(4), 431-447.
Sikdar, M., Pritish Chaudhuri. 2015. Pottery making
tradition among the Prajapati community of Gujarat,
India. Eurasian Journal of Anthropology, 6, 1-14.
Supantono, W., A. Haldani. 2006. Identifikasi Unsur -
Unsur Simbolik Pada Gerabah Tradisional Kasongan
Dan Bayat 1995 – 2005. Jurnal Reka Cipta.
E. A. Kosasih, 1982. “Tradisi berburu Pada Lukisan Gua di
Pulau Muna (Sulawesi Tenggara), REHPA I, 1982,
hlm.1–29.
Kempers, A. J. Bernett. 1959. Ancient Indonesian Art.
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 41.
The Failure of Regeneration Traditional Pottery Handicraft
583