3.1 Building Undergraduate Students’
Understanding of Fanfiction and
Literary Canon
The results of a preliminary survey show that all of
the students already knew about fanfiction. Further
investigation reveals that 8 (28.57%) of the students
came to know fanfiction while browsing on the
internet and they had the experience of reading
several pieces of fanfiction. More than half or 16
(57.14%) of them heard about fanfiction from friends
or relatives and had read one or at least two pieces of
short fanfiction. The rest of the students, or four of
them (14.28%), had only heard about fanfiction but
never had the experience of reading it.
The results of the survey confirmed the argument
that undergraduate students who are mostly
technologically savvy are quite familiar with
fanfiction, as one of the most popular platforms of
online reading and writing. Thus, teaching literature
to them using fanfiction is considered appropriate, as
also shown by other similar studies (McWilliams, et
al., 2011; Sauro and Sundmark, 2016; Schattenherz,
2016; Thomas, 2006). With students being familiar
with fanfiction, the researcher gained more
confidence in using this emerging literary genre to
teach English literary canon.
In the next step, the teacher taught using the
methods of lecturing and modeling about types of
fanfiction based on Jenkins (1992). Over the ten types
of fanfiction Jenkins classified, namely
recontextualization, expanding the series timeline,
refocalization, moral realignment, genre shifting,
cross overs, character dislocation, personalization,
emotional intensification, and eroticization, the
teacher chose to introduce only the first three types.
This selection was made on the basis of time
efficiency and suitability to the syllabus and the goals
of the course as a whole. The fanfiction models
provided help improve students’ understanding and
assist them in planning what to write.
Another preparation needed for teaching literary
canon using fanfiction is concerned with knowledge
and understanding of English literary canon, and
literary canon in general. Hence, the teacher gave a
lecture to lay the foundation of the topic, which is in
accordance with the general objective of the course
the students were taking. To further familiarize
students with English literary canon, the teacher
assigned them to make their own survey by browsing
on the internet. Due to the large number of students
taking the class and participating in the research and
in order to motivate the students, the teacher divided
them into groups. The students were also assigned to
read several works of their interest and pick one as
their most favorite. In order to create a sense of strong
likes or “fandom”, the teacher asked the students to
do some research on the author’s background and
other relevant information related to the work
selected. A week after, the students presented the
results of their survey. The works selected by the
students include Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,”
Chopin’s “Desiree’s Baby,” Roald Dahl’s “The
Landlady,” and W. W. Jacob’s “The Monkey’s Paw.”
The next process is the writing of fanfiction based on
the four selected canonical short stories.
3.2 Improvement in Students’
Understanding of the Literary
Canon
In general, it can be stated that the students improve
their understanding of the canonical short stories
assigned. The improvement can be seen in the
increased average score of their close-reading and
literary analysis tests before and after the
collaborative fanfiction writing, namely 44.5 and
74.5, respectively in a 100 scale. Teacher’s
observations further reveal this improvement, as the
students are able to answer her question, become
more engaged in the group and classroom discussion,
and show more enthusiasm in the teaching and
learning process as a whole. Interviews were also
conducted in order to gain more explanations about
how the students improve their understanding and
how they think fanfiction has helped them. These
improvements will be elaborated in the rest of the
paragraphs.
In the first two weeks, the students were assigned
to read the selected short stories at home and discuss
them in the classroom with their groupmates and the
teacher. A close-reading and literary analysis test then
was given in the following week. An average score of
44.5 was obtained, which is less than satisfactory.
Upon closer investigation, the students who scored
lower than or equal to the average score had several
reasons for their unsatisfactory performance. Some of
them admitted that they did not have the motivation
to read the short stories. They were further
discouraged by the difficult grammatical structure
and vocabularies contained in the text. On the other
hand, students who had quite good knowledge of
grammar and vocabulary encountered difficulties in
understanding the story due to their lack of
background knowledge, such as historical events,
people, and places mentioned in the story and the
culture involved. Van (2009) attested to this
difficulty, noting that in addition to linguistic barriers,
Conference in collaboration with the First International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education