compounded by Relph, (1986) that the indoor or
exterior space either building or landscape can
describe an image of a place. With this features the
place is recognizable. However, a place is not
recognized by physical features alone, it is the human
activity resulted by the culture gives life to this place.
This combination of activity and physical features is
very meaningful for a particular area that give a sense
of place to it (Schultz, 1979).
A sense of phenomenon is hard to understand
unless the relationship of the ‘intangible’ nature of
man with physical characteristics of the elements is
considered. On the other hand, the interaction
between humans and the environment will adjust with
the environmental organization according to their
behavior. To get close to the nature of the place,
Lukerman (1964 in Relph 1986) featured six specific
components in relation to its characteristic features:
1. The place has these locations described by the
feature or context of the place.
2. The place has natural and cultural elements
integration
3. The place depicts the integral integration of the
elements and physical elements
4. The place is part of macro place
5. The place may change and the effects of the change
explained through activity or physical element
6. The place has meaning and it influenced by human
beliefs
Physical elements in an area have a profound effect
not only improving the atmosphere but also providing
a quality when this element works for human usage.
This element is also an object or feature that becomes
an unforgettable image in someone’s cognitive
memory. In the urban design discipline, Lynch (1981)
uses the visual analytical method to evaluate the
element to facilitate the understanding of the subject
through cognitive understanding objectively. Among
these elements are paths, boundaries, nodes,
landmarks, and edges. Each of these elements has
certain features and that determine image ability of a
place. This element is not happen but the physical and
function as desired by the user is intertwine with the
principle of urban design. The besieged space
resulting from the formation of squares, building
walls, sculptured objects and landscape give a certain
characteristic based on the texture, mass, and rhythm
of the urban setting. The combination and formation
of these elements will result creation of distinctive
urban place.
4 METHODOLOGY
This research was carried out at the promenade of
Ajman Waterfront, United Arab Emirates and it
focuses on identifying the attributes and
characteristics that influence the place attachment.
The research applied mixed method techniques due to
its multi-dimensional aspects in urban design
discipline (Cresswell, 1994). Generally, the mix-
method strategy is suitable in explaining the
phenomenon for this study.
A random field survey conducted on site of 50
respondents during a three days exercise of different
time of the week to collect various sources of data
from several respondents. The question related to the
accessibility, familiarity, diversity, vitality, diversity,
uniqueness, safety and security and comfort were
asked. The result of the survey was determined
according to the frequency and mean percentage.
Ajman is also the center of trades and business and
booming, hence, the expatriates came from all over
the world. The respondents came from various
background and nationalities. The result from the
interview of different nationalities will support the
sources and methods triangulated. Lynch, (1988)
mentioned that triangulation method is suitable for
uncover each layer of phenomenon and to enhance
the scope and range of the research. This technique is
suitable because the relationship between people and
place were rather diverse and interrelated. Thus, the
dependent variable, such as physical elements,
activities and images used to discover the strong
attributes and characteristics that influencing user
attachment to the place.
The physical characteristics of the case study area
recorded and observed by using attributes of elements
as in Table 1.0. Observation from the urban character
assessment helped to compliment the other methods
to produce a more complete representation of the
actual scenario. It is useful to obtain a direct
experience with the study area, recording information
and to identify the aspects that are rarely seen and
useful in uncovering the matters that may be
uncomfortable to be discuss by the respondents
(Lynch 1988). Hence, the researchers observe and
document the activity pattern. With help of
photographs and drawings the checklist are enrich.
The urban character defined the criteria such as
accessibility, familiarity, vitality, diversity comfort,
transaction, uniqueness, safety and security. Indicator
for each attribute constructed for the evaluation cross-
examined with the literature.