The Risk Mitigation to the Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia
Fiska Silvia Raden Roro
Islamic Law Lecturer at Faculty of Law Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Keywords: crowdfunding, financial, Islamic, risk mitigation, technology.
Abstract: Islamic crowdfunding which is one of the digital technology and information development on finance and
economics provide online financial services for contracting parties without them knowing each other. In the
Islamic crowdfunding system, the contracting parties may never meet in the real life or even they will stay
anonymous to each other. This situation shows that a cyber risk is one of the legal risks in Islamic
crowdfunding transaction. Other than legal protection and supervision through policy and comprehensive
regulatory framework from the authorized institution, risk mitigation is urgently needed to protect those who
are bound to Islamic crowdfunding transactions, especially legal protection for financer. In the end of May
2018, The Financial Services Authority/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan returned 41 registration documents from the
candidate of financial technology companies (fintech) due to the consideration that they are unable to fulfill
the obligation to mitigate the risks. The concept of Islamic crowdfunding draws inspiration from microfinance
and crowdsourcing under sharia principle. Beside its benefits in terms of easy and practical side, Islamic
crowdfunding also has magnitude risk. This article will explain what are the risks that become obstacle to
Islamic crowdfunding and the legal solutions in order to conduct risk mitigation in Indonesia. Regarding to
the guidance (fatwa) of Dewan Syariah Nasional/National Sharia Board No. 117/DSN-MUI/II/2018, therefore
this paper is limited only to analyse Islamic crowdfunding as a platform of financial service based on
information technology under the sharia principles.
1 INTRODUCTION
In this digital era, the utilization of technology has
not only delivered to the characteristics of new
business transaction model, but also raised the
alternative system of new financial institutions.
Islamic crowdfunding is a hybrid business innovation
model that integrates the concept of business ethics of
Islamic finance institutions and crowdfunding as one
of fundraising innovation model of finance
technology. Islamic crowdfunding is expected to
become a solution for micro, small and medium
enterprises or start-up business instead of formal
financial intermediaries. As a new funding method,
crowdfunding can support various improvement for
profit, cultural, social ventures, and community
development. Through this article the author attempts
to promote Islamic crowdfunding as a new model of
innovation businesss.
The financial technology (hereinafter referred to
as fintech) company signs up to The Financial
Services Authority/Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
(hereinafter referred to as OJK) to comply with the
Regulation of The Financial Services
Authority/Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
(hereinafter referred to as POJK) No. 77 of 2017 on
the Lending Service based on Information
Technology. PT Ammana Fintek Syariah is one of
fintech company that has officially registered and
licensed as the first fintech company based on sharia
principles in Indonesia. The OJK stated that until 10
June 2018, the number of fintech listed by them
consisted of 63 conventional fintech and 1 sharia
fintech (in the near future there will be four lending-
based financial technology companies-based that
runs the sharia principles in the process of filing a
registered permit). OJK, however, will return
registration documents from the candidate of
financial technology companies (fintech) due to
inability to fulfill the obligation to do risk mitigation.
Crowdfunding is one of the financial technology
services platform. There is no specific regulation on
Islamic crowdfunding in Indonesia, therefore there is
a lack of regulation regarding to the definition, term
and conditions, legal protection and supervision
which can cover risk mitigation regulations. In
February 2018, National Sharia Board/Dewan
Raden Roro, F.
The Risk Mitigation to the Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0010052002370245
In Proceedings of the International Law Conference (iN-LAC 2018) - Law, Technology and the Imperative of Change in the 21st Century, pages 237-245
ISBN: 978-989-758-482-4
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
237
Syariah Nasional (hereinafter referred to as DSN-
MUI) has enacted guidance through Fatwa No.
117/DSN-MUI/II/2018 regarding Financial Service
based on Information Technology under Sharia
Principles (hereinafter referred to as Fatwa DSN-
MUI No.117/2018). This Fatwa DSN-MUI
No.117/2018 is only guidance, since the
characteristic of fatwa is non-binding as the law is
established. Financial services based on information
technology under sharia principles is the
implementation of financial services based on sharia
principles which bring together or connect financiers
with financing recipients in order to establish
financing contracts through electronic systems by
using the internet. Meanwhile based on Article 1
point 3 of POJK No. 77 /POJK.01/2016, the lending
service based on information technology based is the
implementation of financial services to arrange a
meeting among lenders with the recipient of the loan
in order to construct a lending agreements in rupiah
currency directly through electronic systems by using
the internet. This platform is generally aimed to
support the development of microcredit or small and
medium enterprises (hereinafter referred to as SMEs)
in capital and investment. The method of the lending
service based on information technology is expected
to be a solution for SMEs and new start-up business.
Bryan A. Garner
1
stated that crowdfunding is a
collective fundraising effort that involves using the
internet to attract potential fund owners who have the
opportunity to support the goals of fundraisers. Adam
Ng refers to Ordanini defined crowdfunding as “a
collective effort by consumers who network and pool
their money together, usually via the internet, in order
to invest in and support efforts initiated by other
people or organizations”. From these definitions,
social capital in the form of trust, social network, and
norms are all important elements and outcomes of
crowdfunding.
2
According to the Adam Ng,
3
while
there are challenges confronting this new sector, there
are unique opportunities for the development of an
equity-based crowdfunding ecosystem that comprises
the funders-investors, crowdfunding portals, third-
party services, technology, entrepreneur,
development organizations, and the government.
Four key enablers of a robust crowdfunding investing
1
Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, Tenth Edition,
Thomson Reuters, Texas,2014, p. 459.
2
A Adam Ng, Abbas Mirakhor, and Mansor H. Ibrahim,
Social Capital and Risk Sharing: An Islamic Finance
Paradigm, Palgrave Macmillan,New York, 2015, p. 117.
3
Ibid, p. 10.
ecosystem are (a) enabling policy and comprehensive
regulatory framework; (b) community engagement;
(c) entrepreneurial culture; and (d) technology and
infrastructure.
As a comparison, England is one of the countries
giving specific definition of crowdfunding in one of
their laws. The FCA’s Regulatory Approach to
Crowdfunding Over The Internet, and The Promotion
of Non-Readily Realisable Securities by Other Media
Feedback to CP13/13 and Final Rules which is
contained in Policy Statement PS14/4, which
explains the definition of crowdfunding as following:
“Crowdfunding is a way in which people,
organisation and business (including business start-
ups) can raise money through online portals
(crowdfunding platforms) to finance or re-finance
their activities and enterprises. Some crowdfunding
activity is unregulated, some is regulated and some is
exempt from regulation”.
In relation to characteristic of crowdfunding,
Hermer
4
differentiated based on the background,
namely crowdfunding as an intermediate body, as a
business body (for profit/commercial) and as a non-
profit body (not to profit). Piotr Pazowski
5
divided
into four types of platform of crowdfunding as
following:
a. investment crowdfunding/equity-based
crowdfunding
b. lending-based crowdfunding
c. reward-based crowdfunding
d. donation-based crowdfunding.
Meanwhile, in the FCA official website, each
definition of crowdfunding platform is being
explained as following: (i). loan-based crowdfunding:
also known as peer to peer lending, here the customer
lending money as a reward of interest payment and
capital repayment from time to time; (ii). investment-
based crowdfunding: customer invest directly or
indirectly in a new business or settled business by
buying investment such as stock or debenture; (iii).
donation-based crowdfunding: persons who is giving
money to a company or organisation they support;
(iv). pre-payment or reward-based crowdfunding:
persons who is giving money as a reward over
appreciation, services or products (like a concert
ticket, innovative products computer games).
6
4
Joachim Hemer, A Snapshot on Crowdfunding, Fraunhofer
Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI,
Karlsruhe ,2011, p. 12.
5
Piotr Pazowski, “Economic Prospects And Conditions Of
Crowdfunding”, International Conference: Human Capital
without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality
Life,Portoroz, Slovenia, 2014, p. 1081.
6
https://www.fca.org.uk.
iN-LAC 2018 - International Law Conference 2018
238
Undeniably, due to insufficient regulation related
to Islamic crowdfunding in Indonesia, some
financiers and SMEs are still unsure regarding to the
definition, regulation, risk and its mitigation, legal
protection, supervision of the Islamic crowdfunding
platform. This article will analyse the risk of Islamic
crowdfunding, its regulation and supervision in
Indonesia, and the effort of legal protection,
especially to mitigate the risks in Islamic
crowdfunding.
2 THE RISKS IN ISLAMIC
CROWDFUNDING
Parties in Islamic crowdfunding system portrays the
huge risk inherent to all parties especially cyber
related risks, in addition to that it also shows lack of
legal protection to the parties bound to the Islamic
crowdfunding transactions. Legal protection is
required to protect all parties especially the funds
giver. Following are several risks in Islamic
crowdfunding :
a. Cyber Risk
Cyber risk is a risk inherent in to any transaction
based on information technology or depends on
the internet. Islamic crowdfunding illustrates the
magnitude of the risks will be borne by the parties,
especially the risks related to cyber risk which it
is known very weak in legal protection and law
enforcement. Risk mitigation is one of the legal
protection which is very important to protect the
parties, especially the funders. To prevent and
overcome all the risks faced in Islamic
crowdfunding. Some legal components that can
be used as elements in the framework of legal
protection as preventive and repressive risk
mitigation efforts include regulatory sandbox, risk
management in Islamic crowdfunding, oversight
function by authorized institutions, as well as the
legal protection of the parties if there is a
discrepancy with the contract, it is necessary to
regulate liability, sanctions or compensation
(dhaman al aqd) and related sanctions.
b. Shariah/ Legal Compliance Risk
Lack of regulations and literation of Islamic
crowdfunding lead to the arise of sharia/ legal
compliance. The existence of a command for
muslim to comply with sharia as a binding legal
rule is recognized as the main duty of a muslim
7
R. Michael Feener,”Social Engineering Through Shari’a:
Islamic Law And State-Directed Da’wa In Contemporary
Aceh” , Indonesia law Review, Vol. 3,2013 , p. 308.
throughout the world. This is not constrained in its
application only if there is support by the social
and political system of law for the interests of
muslims in carrying out sharia compliance. If not,
then sharia will be faced with a larger and stronger
manipulation of legal, social, and political
interests. This is in line with Feener's statement
which states that:
7
Sharīa is particularly powerful for providing
such binding rules of conduct because it is, on one
level, a sufficiently abstract notion to appeal to
anyone who would consider him or herself
Muslim. At the same time, however, under this
broad assent to Sharī’a as an ideal, there are
immense spaces for the elaboration of very
specific positions on a wide range of social and
political—as well as more specifically religious—
issues. Such a situation allows the possibility for
great manipulation by certain powerful interests.
c. Financing Risks
The following are some credit or financing risks
that are likely to be faced by Islamic
crowdfunding funders when conducting
cooperation in financing:
1. Business Failure and Investment Losses.
Most of the budding business people have no
experience in running their business, lack of
knowledge and entrepreneurial skills in the
early stages end in business failure, but there
are also micro, small, and medium enterprises
(hereinafter referred to as MSME) business
actors or start-up businesses in the early stages
who succeed in giving multiple benefits to the
fund providers. This means that the funder is
more likely to have a loss than to get a profit.
2. Unspent Profits
If MSME businessmen or start-up businesses
at an early stage succeed in making a profit,
they will usually use the profit for their
business expansion and therefore there will be
a long lag before the business actor distributes
the profits to the funder.
3. Additional Capital
When a start-up business or MSME is
successful and growing, usually they will need
additional capital and therefore the business
actor will carry out an advanced capital search
campaign. As a result of the additional capital
obtained by the business, the proportion of
profit/profit sharing from the initial funder is
divided by the next fund provider.
The Risk Mitigation to the Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia
239
3 RISK SHARING IN ISLAMIC
CROWDFUNDING
TRANSACTIONS
The development of the Islamic crowdfunding
platforms and products may therefore more promote
risk sharing activities.
8
In Fatwa DSN-MUI No.
117/2018, there are several types of aqad and their
mechanisms of risk sharing which is related to the
Islamic financial technology transaction, namely:
a. Sale and Purchase Agreement, is a contract
between the seller and the buyer that results in the
transfer of ownership of the exchanged object
(goods and prices);
b. Ijarah contract, is a contract of transfer of
usufructuary rights on a certain item or service
within a certain time by payment of ujrah or
wages;
c. Musharakah contract: a cooperation contract
between two or more parties for a particular
business in which each party contributes venture
capital funds (ra's al-mal) provided that profits
are divided according to agreed ratio or
proportionally, while losses are borne by the
parties proportional;
d. Mudharabah agreement: a contract of cooperation
between a capital owner (shahibu al-maal) who
provides all capital with the manager ('amil /
mudharib) and business profits are divided among
them according to the ratio agreed in the contract,
while the loss is borne by the capital owner;
e. Qardh agreement: a loan agreement from the
lender with the provision that the loan recipient
must return the money he receives in accordance
with the agreed time and method;
f. Wakalah contract: a contract of delegation of
power from the power of attorney (muwakil) to the
recipient of the power of attorney (wakil) to
accomplish certain legal actions which may be
represented;
g. Wakalah bi al-ujrah: a wakalah contract which is
accompanied by a reward in the form of ujrah
(fee).
Furthermore, this fatwa stated several model of
information technology-based financing based on
sharia principles that can be performed by service
provider, which are:
Firstly, factoring financing; namely financing in
the form of service for collection of receivables based
on proof of invoice, either accompanied or without
8
A Adam Ng, Abbas Mirakhor, and Mansor H. Ibrahim,
Social Capital and Risk Sharing: An Islamic Finance
Paradigm, Palgrave Macmillan,New York, 2015, p. 120.
accompanied by bail (qardh) given to entrepreneur
who have a bill to a third party (payor).
Secondly, financing procurement of third party
ordered goods (purchase orders); namely financing
provided to entrepreneur who have obtained orders or
work orders for procurement of goods from third
parties.
Thirdly, financing the procurement of goods for
entrepreneur that sell online (online seller); namely
financing provided to entrepreneur who conduct
online buying and selling transactions at information
technology-based trading service providers (market
place/ e-commerce platform) who are already
working in partnership with the service provider
Fourthly, financing the procurement of goods for
entrepreneur who sell online with payment through
the provider of payment gateways; namely financing
provided to entrepreneur who are actively selling
online (seller) through their own distribution channels
and payments made through payment authorization
providers online (payment gateway) which
cooperates with the service provider.
Fifthly, funding for employees; namely financing
provided to employees who need consumptive
financing with a salary cut cooperation scheme
through the employer institution.
Sixthly, community-based financing, namely
financing provided to community members who need
financing, with the payment scheme being
coordinated through the community
coordinator/management.
Meanwhile, based on Article. No.1 verse (25) the
sharia law, the definition of funding the provision of
funding or bill which is considered to be similar to
that is in the form of:
1. Profit share transaction in the form of
mudharabah and musyarakah;
2. Renting transaction in a form of ijarah or ijarah
muntahiya bittamlik;
3. Trade transaction in a form of accounts
receivable murabahah, salam, istishan;
4. Lending transactions in a form of accounts
receivable qardh;
5. Service renting transaction in a form of ijarah;
6. Multi-service transaction.
This fatwa also contain provisions that are
prohibited in sharia financing service based on
information technology, including riba (an additional
given in the exchange of riba goods/ riba fadl or
additional that is agreed upon in the principal debt in
return for the suspension of payment in absolute
iN-LAC 2018 - International Law Conference 2018
240
terms/riba nasi'ah); gharar (an uncertainty in a
contract, either regarding the quality or quantity of the
object of the contract or about its submission); maysir
(every contract that is carried out with unclear
objectives, and inaccurate calculation, speculation, or
profit); tadlis (the act of hiding the object's contract
disability done by the seller to trick the buyer as if the
object of the contract is not defective); and dharar (an
action that can cause harm or loss to another party).
From the explanation above it can be concluded
that Islamic crowdfunding or sharia crowdfunding or
sharia crowdfunding based on information
technology contain deflation as a crowdfunding
platform designed to fulfill sharia principle, which is
an effort to collect/raising funds collectively
(individual and/or organisation) in funding a project
of start-up business/ SMEs, giving financing both
personal or business, or other necessities over internet
platform which is in line with sharia principle. Islamic
crowdfunding implement sharia contracts between
giver, site organiser and receiver. In addition to that,
the object and aim of financing which is funded are
also things that have to comply with sharia principles
that must be excluding gambling, interest, gharar and
batil substance.
4 RISK MITIGATION IN ORDER
TO THE LEGAL PROTECTION
TO THE ISLAMIC
CROWDFUNDING
In order to the legal protection to the Islamic
crowdfunding may be preventive or repressive to the
parties who infringe the law, both need supervision
by the authorized body. In relation to preventive legal
protection, the legal protection that can be done are
regulatory sandbox and risk management. Regulatory
sandbox is a preventive legal protection form for the
implementation of a healthy fintech transaction, the
balance between innovation and risk management,
9
regulation that puts forward its protection to the
society and strengthening the coordination with the
related parties. Regulatory sandbox will contain
9
Fintech Bank Indonesia is a place for assesment, risk
mitigation, and an evaluation of business and
product/service model from fintech and also the research
initiator related to information technology based financing
servicing activity based on banking. The aim of the
establishment of fintech office are; first, facilitate the
innovation development in the ecosystem of technology
based finance in Indonesia, Second, prepare Indonesia to
optimising the technology development in an attempt of
digital transition procedures and will be applied in
order for the fintech performer to fulfill the criteria
determined by the Central Bank of Indonesia/Bank
Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as BI), which is to
gain opportunity to maturing the concept and
developing it in a healthy way, and in time it will be
able to provide secure financial services for the
society.
Regulatory sandbox issued by fintech office
which is aiming to give legal protection and risk
mitigation to fintech performer, including
crowdfunding. When an Islamic crowdfunding has
been registered declared to have official permission,
then this business has truly fulfilled the criteria and
has matured the concept, and it has an opportunity to
develop in a healthy way and in time is able to provide
secure financial services for the society. Through that
provision, BI is regulating and giving permission and
supervising the performance of fintech. Regulatory
sandbox is also implemented in England and
Singapore in order to protect the investor and the
spear head of financial sector development interest.
On the official website of Financial Conduct
Authority (hereinafter referred to as FCA) in
England, the objective of regulatory sandbox is
elaborated, which enable company to verify product,
services, business model and innovative presentation
mechanism in areal market with a real customer.
Meanwhile, up until now there has not been any
standard regulation in relation to regulatory sandbox.
The regulation applied in England and Singapore,
however, may at least describes how this policy
works. In relation to the sandbox, in Singapore it is
issued by Monetary Authority of Singapore
(hereinafter referred to as MAS) and become solution
to facilitate the innovator to experience and regulate
the government. The regulatory sandbox by MAS is
a first step in regulating fintech without strangling
innovation and enable to experiment. MAS will
loosen specific regulation requirements that may be
applied to the applicant. Sandbox provides protection
which is suitable to accommodate its consequence to
the customers due to the impact of failures which is
limited to a specific trial group. By managing
sandbox, they will be more able to understand and
economic development, third, increasing the
competitiveness of Indonesia technology based finance
industry. Fourth, absorbing the information and giving
feedback to support the BI policy formulation as a response
towards the development which is based on technology. To
achieve that main goal fintech office will operate in four
different function, which are a catalyst or facilitator,
businesses intelligence assessment and also co-ordination
and communication function.
The Risk Mitigation to the Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia
241
arrange specific fintech regulation for the future
economy.
Generally, registrant which has finally passed
the sandbox regulation test obliged to report regularly
to the authority. They, however, do not have to fulfill
all the regulation requirements immediately. In an
exam period, company may be taking benefit of the
flexibility and concession offered by “sandbox” to
gain experience and gain its strength if their
innovation is proven to succeed and the company is
able to comply with relevant constitution after
sandbox examination, product maybe used to the
wider scale of a government agreement. Some things
that need to be taken into consideration are eligibility
of applicants and consumer safeguard. Furthermore,
fintech supervising board given individual guide
about the interpretation of the regulation based on
case after case that may be encountered by the
business performer. Both the MAS and FCA are
holding specific standard that obliging the applicant
to formulate a strategy which is just and clear for the
customer when the examination finished according to
the regulation.
Other than risk mitigation as legal protection by
authorized institutions, the implementation of risk
mitigation is also an obligation to the candidate and
the registered company of Islamic crowdfunding.
Risk mitigation mechanism in sharia transaction is
enable to be implemented in Islamic crowdfunding.
Risk mitigation in Islamic crowdfunding is related to
the risk management, legal protection and
supervision.
Regarding to the risk management, risk
management functions as a filter or early warning
system for financial service activities, including the
need for risk management in Islamic crowdfunding.
Adiwarman Karim
10
said that the purposes of the the
risk management are (i). providing information about
risks to regulators, (ii). ensuring that banks do not
experience unacceptable losses, (iii). minimizing
losses from various risks that are uncontrolled, (iv).
measuring exposure and concentration risk, (v).
allocating capital and limiting risk.
Adiwarman Karim, as quoted by Trisadini
Prasastinah Usanti
11
, explained that there are
fundamental differences between Islamic banks and
conventional banks, the difference is in what is
measured (what to measure), not how to measure.
That the Islamic bank operational risk management
10
Adiwarman A Karim, Bank Islam: Analisis Fiqih dan
Keuangan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007, p. 256.
11
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti, “Pengelolaan Risiko
Pembiayaan Di Bank Syariah, Adil : Jurnal Hukum” ,Vol.
3 No.2,2015, p. 422.
process includes risk identification, risk assessment,
risk anticipation and risk monitoring. Risk
management in Islamic banks has a different
character from conventional banks, mainly because of
the inherent types of risk that only exist in Islamic
banks. Even the risk management provisions for
Islamic banks may be applied in Islamic
crowdfunding risk management. Risk identification
carried out by Islamic banks does not only cover the
various risks that exist in financial institutions in
general, but also includes typical risks in Islamic
financial institutions. So that risk management in
Islamic bank can be implemented to Islamic
crowdfunding which are risk identification, risk
assessment, risk anticipation and risk monitoring.
In the operations of Islamic financial institutions
so far, namely the provisions regarding risk
management in Islamic banks, on the asset side,
investments can be made through profit-based
financing (mudarabah and musyarakah) and fixed
income financing models, such as murabahah
(selling buy by mark-up), buying and selling with
installments (murabahah / medium / long term),
istishna'/ greetings (submission of deferred sale and
purchase objects or advance payment) and ijarah
(leasing). Funds are only provided to finance business
activities in accordance with Islamic principles.
While on the liability side, third party funds can be
collected in the form of current accounts and
investment accounts. The first type of fund in Islamic
banks is qard hasan (interest-free loan) or amanah
(trust contract). The fund must be returned in full to
the depositor for the performance (demand deposit).
While investment depositors will receive
compensation based on the profit and loss sharing
(PLS) scheme and the fund shares in the bank's
operational risk. The application of the principle of
profit sharing to depositors is a unique characteristic
of Islamic banks. These characteristics together with
variations in financing models and compliance with
sharia principles, has changed the risk characteristics
faced by Islamic banks.
12
12
Khan Tariqullah dan Habib Ahmed, Manajemen Risiko
Lembaga Keuangan Syariah, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 2008,
p. 2-3.
iN-LAC 2018 - International Law Conference 2018
242
5 SUPERVISION BY
AUTHORIZED INSTITUTION
Regarding to the legal protection of the Islamic
crowdfunding system, it means that it discusses the
supervision by government to the Islamic
crowdfunding system itself. Supervision must be
carried out by the authorized institution so that there
is no overlapping in carrying out the supervisory
function. Regarding supervision in the field of
fintech, including oversight of crowdfunding, there is
still a lack of regulation so that the coordination
system between BI and the OJK has not been realized
because until now there are no legal instruments
governing the formal framework (both at the level of
general policy makers and at the technical level) in
order to support the supervisory task related to the
course of crowdfunding activities. The FCA strictly
stated on its official website that the regulated internet
business model activities only deal with loan-based
crowdfunding platforms (loan-based crowdfunding):
also known as 'peer-to-peer lending', and investment-
based crowdfunding (investment-based
crowdfunding) and FCA does not regulate donation-
based crowdfunding (donation-based crowdfunding)
and pre-payment or rewards-based crowdfunding.
13
The crowdfunding platform is differentiated on
the purpose of the activity. If Islamic crowdfunding is
intended to be built on an ijarah contract that aims to
carry out activities primarily related to financing
services, the financing services authority is the
institution authorized to monitor it. This has been
regulated in Article 6 of Act Number 21 of 2011
concerning the Financial Services Authority/OJK
(State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2011
Number 111, Supplement to the State Gazette of the
Republic of Indonesia Number 5253), that the OJK
carries out the task of regulating and supervising the
activities of financial services in the sector of
banking, financial services activities in the capital
market, and financial services activities in the
insurance, pension funds, financial institutions and
other financial services institutions. OJK has a role to
organize an integrated system of regulation and
supervision of all activities within the financial
services sector. OJK has authority in the field of
regulation and supervision. In the field of supervision,
OJK supervises and protects consumers in the
banking sector, capital market, and Non-Bank
Financial Industry/Industri Keuangan Non-Bank
13
https://www.fca.org.uk.
14
Rebekka Dosma Sinaga, “Sistem Koordinasi Antara Bank
Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Pengawasan
(hereinafter referred to as IKNB), provides and/or
revokes business licenses, approves or determines
dissolution, gives written orders to financial service
institutions and appoints site managers Islamic
crowdfunding web and authorized to set
administrative sanctions. In the task of bank
supervision there is coordination between BI and
OJK. BI exercises its authority in the field of
macroprudential, and OJK in the field of
microprudential.
14
Supervisory agencies will be different if Islamic
crowdfunding binds itself to a tabarru contract which
the main activity is donation based crowdfunding and
the position of the funder is a donor, not a capital
provider. If the funds raised in fundraising are
donation conducted through Islamic crowdfunding
platforms, it is very possible that the funds are
included in the category of zakat, infaq and sadaqah.
Related to the management of zakat regulated by the
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2011
concerning Management of Zakat (State Gazette of
the Republic of Indonesia Number 115 in 2011,
Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of
Indonesia Number 5255) (hereinafter referred to as
the Zakat Management Law), the supervisory
function is on the National Zakat Board/ Badan Zakat
Nasional (hereinafter referred to as BAZNAS). In this
case, the government carries out regulatory control
duties, and BAZNAS as the executing agency. The
reason for the government to design BAZNAS as a
non-structural government institution whose
membership consists of elements of society and
government, is that the nature of its nature is not lost.
To assist BAZNAS in the implementation of
collecting, distributing and utilizing zakat, the
community is possible to create Amil zakat
agencies/Lembaga Amil Zakat (hereinafter referred
to as LAZ). Every LAZs must obtain permission
from the government. Zakat finance is not included in
the national budget of Indonesia balance sheet, but it
is reported in the document. The state has an interest
in facilitating muslims in fulfilling the obligation of
zakat, but not taking advantage of the people's funds.
It is firmly stipulated in Article 1 jo. Article 5 of the
Zakat Management Law, that BAZNAS is an
institution that carries out zakat management
nationally, domiciled in the capital city of the country
and is a non-structural government institution that is
independent and responsible to the President through
the Minister.
Bank Setelah Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun
2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan “,Transparency,
Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, Volume I Nomor 2 Feb-Mei 2013.
The Risk Mitigation to the Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia
243
Nur Aqidah Suhaili
15
stated that in Islamic
crowdfunding can apply waqf as an object of
fundraising, if so, then the supervisory function
related to waqf is regulated in Article 34 jo Article 36
of Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Wakaf (State
Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 Number
159, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic
of Indonesia Number 4459) (hereinafter referred to as
the Waqf Law). The provisions in the Waqf Law
stipulate that the authorized institution in the land
waqf field is the National Land Agency. Authorized
institutions in the field of waqf of movable objects
other than money are agencies related to their main
duties. Agencies that are authorized in the field of
waqf of movable objects other than unregistered
goods are Indonesian Waqf Board (Badan Wakaf
Indonesia).
6 THE LIABILITY OF THE
PARTIES
In common business transactions when the
distribution of results and achievements related to the
fulfillment of the contract is not appropriate, then the
liability efforts, compensations and sanctions are the
answer to the legal protection of Islamic
crowdfunding. In the national legal system as a
consequence of Article 1367 Burgerlijk Wetboek
which states that everyone must be responsible for
persons or objects under his control. As outlined
earlier, that crowdfunding systems that depend on the
internet are subject to the Act of Information and
Electronic Transaction/Undang-Undang tentang
Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (hereinafter
referred to as ITE Law ) Law, but in this ITE law there
is no explicit provision of the principle of liability is
adopted, The ITE law states that parties that conduct
electronic transactions must be performed under the
good faith principle, and among them three forms of
liability, namely (i) liability for errors (liability based
on fault), (ii) liability for negligence (negligence) or
(iii) principle of liability without error (strict
liability).
Nining Latianingsih stated that basically the
principle of liability that applies to businesses in a
crowdfunding system is the principle of presumption
15
Nur Aqidah Suhaili, “Crowdfunding: A Collaborative
Waqf Based Internet Platform”, International Journal of
Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 11, Issue 5
(Dec.),2016, p. 41.
16
Nining Latianingsih, “Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Pelaku
Usaha Dalam Transaksi Elektronik Menurut Undang-
of innocence. Basically, the liability of the
businessmen apply the principle of liability for
negligence, but according to its development began to
shift to the application of strict liability, especially in
transactions that have a large risk impact. Whereas
the provisions in the UU ITE applies the principle of
presumed liability to the businessmen, especially in
Article 17 paragraph (1) remind that among parties
must apply good faith, so the application of strict
liability must be seen in the certain cases so that there
is no loss to the other party.
16
7 BUILD AN ECOSYSTEM OF
ISLAMIC CROWDFUNDING
According to the Adam Ng,
17
while there are
challenges confronting this new sector, there are
unique opportunities for the development of an
equity-based crowdfunding ecosystem that comprises
the funders-investors, crowdfunding portals, third-
party services, technology, entrepreneur,
development organizations, and the government.
Four key enablers of a robust crowdfunding investing
ecosystem are (a). enabling policy and
comprehensive regulatory framework; (b).
community engagement; (c). entrepreneurial culture;
and (d). technology and infrastructures. To sum up
the risk mitigation of Islamic crowdfunding will be
effective or in the other words the legal protection,
the supervision and the law enforcement ruin as their
function if there is a harmony among the Islamic
crowdfunding community (service provider, funder,
and the SMEs) and authorized institutions to build an
ecosystem of Islamic crowdfunding which consicts of
policy and comprehensive regulatory framework;
community engagement; entrepreneurial culture; and
support by technology and infrastructure.
8 CONCLUSION
Some risks in Islamic crowdfunding are cyber risk as
a main risk inherent in to any transaction based on
information technology or depends on the internet,
legal protection due to lack of regulations, lack
supervision and lack of law enforcement as factor
Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik”, Jurnal
Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Vol 11, No. 2, Desember 2012, p. 71-
76.
17
Ibid, p. 10.
iN-LAC 2018 - International Law Conference 2018
244
from authorized institutions, in internal SMEs there is
legal/ sharia compliance risk due to lack of of
literation about the Islamic crowdfunding principle,
liability, system and mechanism, and this situation
lead to the herding on financing risk because of
default or expertise factors.
In order to the legal protection, in one side, it is an
obligation to the authorized body to perform risk
mitigation. On the other side, risk mitigation is
compulsory condition for service provider to apply
and thi srisk mitigation should be supported by SMEs
and the funder. The risk mitigation in Islamic
crowdfunding similar with Islamic bank or other
Islamic finance institution which is related to risk
management, legal protection, supervision, and
liability. Risk management itself has been covered by
risk identification, risk assessment, risk anticipation
and risk monitoring.
The main effort to mitigate the risk of Islamic
crowdfunding, the authorized institutions and the
Islamic crowdfunding community (service provider,
funder, and the SMEs) must create a harmony
atmosphere and start to build the ecosystem of
Islamic crowdfunding which consists of policy and
comprehensive regulatory framework; community
engagement; entrepreneurial culture; and support by
technology and infrastructure.
REFERENCES
A Adam Ng, Abbas Mirakhor, and Mansor H. Ibrahim,
Social Capital and Risk Sharing: An Islamic Finance
Paradigm, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015.
Adiwarman A Karim, Bank Islam: Analisis Fiqih dan
Keuangan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.
Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, Tenth Edition,
Thomson Reuters, Texas, 2009.
Joachim Hemer, A Snapshot on Crowdfunding, Fraunhofer
Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI,
Karlsruhe, 2011.
Khan Tariqullah dan Habib Ahmed, Manajemen Risiko
Lembaga Keuangan Syariah, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta,
2008.
Nur Aqidah Suhaili, “Crowdfunding: A Collaborative
Waqf Based Internet Platform”, International Journal
of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 11, Issue 5
(Dec.), 2016.
Piotr Pazowski, “Economic Prospects And Conditions Of
Crowdfunding”, International Conference: Human
Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for
Quality Life, Portoroz, Slovenia, 2014.
R. Michael Feener,”Social Engineering Through Shari’a:
Islamic Law And State-Directed Da’wa In
Contemporary Aceh”, Indonesia law Review, Vol. 3,
2013.
Rebekka Dosma Sinaga, “Sistem Koordinasi Antara Bank
Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam
Pengawasan Bank Setelah Lahirnya Undang-Undang
Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa
Keuangan“, Transparency, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi,
Volume I Nomor 2 Feb-Mei 2013.
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti, “Pengelolaan Risiko
Pembiayaan Di Bank Syariah, “Adil : Jurnal
Hukum”,Vol. 3 No.2, 2015.
The Risk Mitigation to the Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia
245