The Weaving Craftsmen of Songket Batubara: A Study of Local
Wisdom for Welfare
Rozanna Mulyani
1
,
Mardiah Mawar Kembaren
1
, Irwan
1
1
Department of Malay Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, University of Sumatera Utara,
Jl Universitas No. 19, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Weaving Craftsmen, Songket, Local Wisdom
Abstract: This study investigates the welfare of weaving craftsmen of Batubara songket by using the theory of local
wisdom for welfare. The method used in this study is qualitative approach by using descriptive analysis
method. The data were obtained through interview, observation and documentation. The obtained data from
this field research were in the form of writing, recordings, photos and some references from books that support
this study. Basically, the role of government institution, social institution, private institution and other forms
of institution possess significant role in improving the prosperity of songket weaving craftsmen. In addition,
the weaving craftsmen of Malay Songket should implement the local wisdom for welfare theory such as hard
work, discipline, education, health, mutual cooperation, gender management, cultural preservation and
creativity, and environmental care should be done to achieve prosperity.
1 INTRODUCTION
Batubara district is one of the districts in North
Sumatera Province. The indigenous people of
Batubara is Malay people. According to Effendi
(2004:3) Malay people are known as the community
which are rich in cultural treasures. One of the Malay
culture elements is weaving.
Nowadays, People of Batubara district still
preserve weaving activity so it is easy for everyone
who wants to get woven clothes from Batubara
district. In Batubara, this kind of clothes is known as
songket.
The preservation of weaving culture is definitely
an effort of some elements in society with different
roles and functions. The roles and functions of society
in preserving this culture comprising of at least four
elements namely:
- The owner of Songket business
- The craftsmen of Songket
- The seller of Songket, and
- The buyer of Songket.
From those elements, in the process of weaving
culture preservation, it certainly has different role and
responsibilities, but if it is investigated more deeply,
weaving culture conservation is also included as
Local Wisdom in Malay people in Batubara.
Local Wisdom is an indigenous knowledge or
local genius of a community which comes from the
noble value of cultural traditions to manage the order
of community life in order to achieve community
progress both in the creation of peace and the
improvement of community prosperity (Sibarani,
2012:122).
By preserving local wisdom, the effort of creating
harmony and improving the prosperity of community
will also run well, yet in the fact, the craftsmen of
weaving songket have not gained the prosperity,
which can be seen from wages received from songket
trading.
Besides minimum wages, apparently, many
craftsmen complain about the burden of work that
they have to finish since many of them still use
traditional weaving tool or Okik. Therefore, many
craftsmen choose another job because it is easier to
earn money than weaving songket.
Mulyani, R., Kembaren, M. and Irwan, .
The Weaving Craftsmen of Songket Batubara: A Study of Local Wisdom for Welfare.
DOI: 10.5220/0010068311251132
In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches (ICOSTEERR 2018) - Research in Industry 4.0, pages
1125-1132
ISBN: 978-989-758-449-7
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
1125
Figure.1 Traditional loom (Okik)
Many of songket craftsmen are women who are
already old because the youths either girls or boys and
other people prefer another job than weaving. This
condition happens owing to the prosperity issue that
is not guaranteed if they select to be craftsmen of
songket as a main occupation.
If this condition gradually occurs, it can trigger
cultural extinction and local wisdom which had been
maintained among Malay people in Batubara district
will also vanish.
The efforts to improve the prosperity of songket
craftsmen are inseparable from the influence of the
owner of songket business, the seller and buyer of
songket. This means that there should be efforts to
develop the progress of achieving prosperity in the up
and down processes of producing songket.
Amrih (2008:72) clarifies that achieving
prosperity in the world is the goal of someone's life.
This indicates that the prosperity becomes one of the
goals that should be obtained including cultural
preservation of weaving songket.
According to that situation, then an innovation is
needed to overcome that condition such as improving
the welfare of songket craftsmen in order to sustain
the existence of this culture by maintaining the local
wisdom within. Then, the writer is interested in
conducting a study entitled “The Craftsmen of
Weaving Songket Clothes in Batubara: A Study about
Local Wisdom for Welfare”.
2 THE PROBLEM OF THE
STUDY
According to the illustration in advance, the problem
of this study is formulated as the following: “what
efforts can we do to improve the prosperity of songket
craftsmen as well as to preserve local wisdom in the
culture of songket weaving.
3 THE OBJECTIVE AND THE
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
STUDY
3.1
The Objective of the Study
This study is aimed to analyze the process of songket
weaving started from the initial phase to final phase
which are related to the improvement of songket
craftsmen prosperity by using local wisdom for
welfare approach.
3.2 The Significance of the Study
Theoretically, this study is expected to be useful as a
reference for the craftsmen, the entrepreneur of
songket clothes and local government in developing
the prosperity of songket craftsmen.
Then, academically, this research is expected to
be useful as a reference for further research.
4 THE LITERATURE REVIEW
4.1 Local Wisdom
The word of wisdom means discretion while local
means a particular area or regions. Therefore, local
wisdom could be understood as the discretion or
wisdom of a particular area or idea, opinion which is
wise that belongs to a particular social community or
region. In term of type, local wisdom could be
classified in two parts; those are Local wisdom for
peace and Local wisdom for welfare/prosperity.

Figure 2. Chart types of Local (Sibarani, 2012: 134)
Welfare
Local Wisdom
Peace
Politeness,
Honesty,
Social solidarity,
Harmony and
Conflict resolution,
Commitment,
Positive Thinking,
Gratitude
Hard work,
Discipline,
Education, Health,
Mutual Cooperation,
Gender management,
Cultural preservation
and creativity,
Environmental Care.
ICOSTEERR 2018 - International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches
1126
4.2 Local Wisdom for Welfare
Morphologically, the word prosperity comes from the
word prosperous which means in a secure, safe,
welfare, and happy situation. Prosperity means the
fulfillment of primary needs of life such as food,
clothes, house, education, security and health. But in
general, welfare highlights three aspects namely
prosperity, health and peace. (Sibarani, 2012: 186).
Welfare is often connoted with someone's economic
condition so the word welfare often refers to wealth,
therefore welfare could also mean fulfilled situation
of someone's or community's economy either primary
or secondary needs.
Welfare does not come by itself but with a real
work effort and ethos. Every human has high work
ethos. People who dream of achieving prosperity
should be able to utilize the natural and cultural
resources that exist around it so that the local wisdom
for welfare could be materialized.
Then, parts of local wisdom for welfare are hard
work, discipline, education, health, mutual
cooperation, gender management, cultural
preservation and creativity, environmental care
should be executed so that the welfare would be able
to achieve.
For instance, local wisdom for welfare is an effort
to materialize the welfare to individual or community
through the utilization of culture, natural resources
and the philosophy of life that exist in the area, so that
the welfare could be achieved without leaving the
aspect of locality or cultural elements that innate in
society.
5 METHODS
The approach employed in this study is qualitative
approach through descriptive analysis (Miles &
Huberman; 1994, Moleong, 2014). To know, see and
conclude the real condition factually and actually by
looking at the problem and purpose of study, hence
the research method utilized in this study is
qualitative research method. Qualitative research
method could be interpreted as a research design that
produces descriptive data using words in the
presentation of data.
5.1 The Location of the Research
The location of this research was Padang Genting
village, Talawi sub-district, Batubara district, North
Sumatera. This area was selected because there are
many weaving clothes craftsmen from generation to
generation so that weaving culture is a notorious
culture in that region.
5.2 The Informants of the Research
The informants of this research used major informant
chosen based on the data needed by the researcher, so
the data obtained data are more valid and
comprehensive, and the selection was conducted
purposively according to certain characteristics based
on researcher’s needs. The technique of informant
selection was developed by using snowball technique
in order to get maximum, comprehensive and
profound findings.
For that reason, the major informants are
experienced people and understand very well about
the problem of study. And the major informants are
as the followingss:
1) The owner of Songket business
2) The craftsmen
3) Local community
5.3 The Types and Data Sources
The type and the data sources taken from primary and
secondary data. The Primary data of this study were
the data obtained directly from the major informants
and the parties that has relationship directly to the
problem of study. The data were obtained through
interview, observation, and documentations during
the field research. The data were collected in notes,
recordings and photos. Then, the data will be
analyzed in order to answer the problem of study
.
The Secondary data is supporting data which were
gained from outside the informants. These data could
be obtained from some references and scientific
papers which are related to this research. This
secondary data is also a very important supporting
data compared with the perceptions of previous
related research, so that the researcher knows what
things had been concluded and discovered in the
previous study. Then, this secondary data also add
knowledge and important suggestions in the
development of perceptions and analysis the problem
of study
.
5.3.1 The Data Collection Technique
First, the interview. Interview was conducted by
researcher through answer and question technique to
the informants in order to get data and information
about the welfare of the weaving craftsmen.
Additionally, it also employed some instruments
in order to obtain data by using question and answer
The Weaving Craftsmen of Songket Batubara: A Study of Local Wisdom for Welfare
1127
technique. According to Bungin (2004: 62), interview
is divided into two; those are standardized interview
and unstandardized interview. The difference is on
the preparation of questionnaires while the questions
in unstandardized interview are certainly not prepared
but depend on the situation and needs in research.
Second,the purpose of conducting observation by
researcher is to get data based on the results of
systematic observation and recording about weaving
craftsmen's prosperity. The instruments used were
mechanical device which is using mechanical tools
such as camera or audio and video recorder (Narboku,
Dkk, 2005: 74). In this research, the mechanical tools
such as camera and drawing tools are used to
document the data about the required information.
Third, documentation is a way of collecting
documents through pictures or photographs that are
considered important to clarify the results, tools and
materials, making process and motif types which are
described in this study. The documentation tools were
camera, stationary, and notebooks to search for the
documentations on required data.
5.3.2 The Data Analysis Technique
This study is focuses intensively on a particular object
that is weaving craftsmen of Batubara Malay songket
by studying it as a case. In analyzing the data, the
researcher used descriptive analysis discussing the
phenomenon that had occurred then comparing it to a
predetermined criterion or standard that is a destined
criterion and then making a conclusion.
6 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
6.1 The Songket from Malay Batubara
Woven cloth from Batubara district is called Songket.
Besides Batubara, it could also be found in other
regions in Indonesia with different motifs and
patterns that have meaning and value from its origin.
It is part of culture and it adds cultural values in every
region.
Other regions that have woven clothes are
Nangroe Aceh Darussalam (Ija Kasab), North
Sumatera (Ulos), West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi
(Songket), Bengkulu (Songket), South Sumatera
(Songket), Bangka Belitung, Lampung, Banten, West
Java, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Central Java,
East Java, Bali, East Nusa Tenggara, West Nusa
Tenggara, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan,
South Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, North
Sulawesi, West Sulawesi, Central Sulawesi,
Southeast Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, Maluku, North
Maluku and West Papua (Marianti and Istiharini,
2013: 3). So, it could be concluded that Indonesia has
songket with various patterns and motifs from
different areas and definitely with different names.
Songket cloth is a kind of woven traditional Malay
clothes in Indonesia,
Malaysia, and Brunei. Songket
is woven by hands with gold and silver threads.
Metallic thread that is woven on a cloth brings a
brilliant shine effect. The word songket originates
from the term sungkit in Malay language and Bahasa
means "hook" or "gouging". This related to the way
of making songket, hooking and taking a little bit of
woven cloth and then tucking the gold threads in
(Marianti and Istiharini 2013:17).
Weaving songket activities in Indonesia has
already existed for a long time. According to Effendy
(2004:6), on the mainland of Sumatera Island,
weaving activity developed in line with the greatness
of the Malay kingdoms such as Pelalawan Empire
(1530-1879), Inderagiri Empire (1658-1838) and Siak
Sri Inderapura Empire (1723-1858). At that time,
weaving activities in Malay society occurred lively.
It means that weaving activity had become the
culture of Indonesian society which needs to be
preserved and also maintained. For that reason, a
special action is needed to preserve the songket
weaving culture.
Formerly, Malay people using songket as clothing
material. For Malay people, clothes are not only
functioned to cover body from heat and cold but also
functioned as identity, beauty of culture, social strata,
custom and ideology markers, and it doesn’t only
possess pragmatics value but also worth of custom,
culture and aesthetics.
Besides being used as clothing material, songket
had developed and innovated with various kinds and
functions such as wallet, bag, tablecloth, skullcap and
others. It shows that the craftsmen society in
Batubara district dares to innovate and improve form
of it so that they can produce the new models as well
as the functions.
Figure 3. Some innovation of songket
ICOSTEERR 2018 - International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches
1128
Before Batubara songket became a cloth, it
apparently passed a very long processes and stages in
the process of making such as material selection
(yarn). After that, the process of pattern or motif
selection is formed, and then continue to the weaving
process. Next step is sorting or inspecting wrong
motifs. And the final step is marketing the products.
These processes took one till two weeks to create a
single piece of songket. This is because the weaving
tools used are still traditional.
Weaving tools are really important in improving
the productivity. It needs a significant innovation
which is able to simplify, accelerate, and increase the
quality of songket and as the result, it increases the
direct effect to the prosperity of songket craftsmen.
6.2 The Weaving Songket Tool
There are some kinds of weaving tool used in
Indonesia, those are:
1. Gedogan or Okik. This is a traditional loom
which at the edge of this tool is tied to the tree, mast
of house or on a long board with a particular
construction and the other edge of this tool is tied to
the body of weaving tools that sits on the floor.
2. Not machine looms are the weaving tools
moved by foot stamps to adjust the ups and downs of
lint threads at the time of entry the yarn. Yet, this tool
is still less maximize in the process of importing
motifs on songket.
3. Not dobby machine loom. Dobby is an
additional mechanical tool above the traditional
looms. Dobby is functioned to control weaving yarn
on the loom so the motifs are fit to the planned
pattern. (Marianti and Istiharini 2013:4).
4. Machine looms. This tool is more sophisticated
than the three looms above.
The looms of songket in Batubara also called as
Okik. Besides it, there is also another loom used by
Batubara community namely not machine loom, but
it is still a little bit used by craftsmen because it is
quite expensive. Beside it is more expensive than
Okik, apparently, it has weakness in the process of
importing the motifs in songket so that the craftsmen
use okik again as a tool to weave songket.
Figure 4. Okik tool
Compared to other looms in Wajo district,
actually the craftsmen in Wajo district in the
production activity utilize three kinds of loom, those
are Gedogan, not machine looms, and machine
looms.
In 1951, there was a revolution in the use of
weaving tools among Bugis society in general and in
Wajo community particularly. It is signed by the use
of not machine loom in weaving activity. Wajo is one
of the regions in South Sulawesi province which
firstly used not machine loom. Not machine loom
entered Wajo because it was brought by two best
friends namely Akil Amin and Ibrahim Daeng
Manrapi who were inter-island traders who often had
a route Makassar-Surabaya in return (Inanna,
2017:267).
Entering early 2004, modernization of looms
happened. It is marked by the entrance of machine
looms which was bought by a weaving entrepreneur
from Wajo, he is Haji Arifuddin, from a weaving
entrepreneur in Majalaya, West Java (Innana
2017:268).
From the explanation above, actually, Wajo
district is more advanced in the use of looms so that
the weaver community in Batubara should upgrade
and modernize the looms.
The use of modern tools did not necessarily
reduce the aesthetical value of a songket yet the
benefit gained productively and financially will tend
to be more effective and efficient because it will
simplify the songket craftsmen in the production of
songket.
If they keep using traditional looms then gradually
weaving activity will be beaten by the innovation
from other areas that also have songket weaving
culture.
Modern technology should not be denied because
it is part of global life yet modernity must be managed
with local touch (Sibarani 2012:212). It means that if
weaver society in Batubara switches to use modern
The Weaving Craftsmen of Songket Batubara: A Study of Local Wisdom for Welfare
1129
looms then weavers will be easier and faster in the
weaving process.
It is proved by the result felt by weavers that is
only able to produce one songket in two weeks. The
slow weaving process was caused by the songket
weavers who still used okik as loom. Moreover, the
other thing that caused the slow process of weaving
was the weavers tend put this job as a side or part-
time job so that they don’t put this as their main job
or priority. This fact is also caused by the low wages
obtained by the craftsmen so the weavers are not able
to fulfill their needs hence the weavers only wave in
their spare time or half day.
This is a very serious issue where the weavers
who are one of the elements that maintain the
weaving culture do not get the economic impact
directly due to the low income they receive from
weaving songket activity.
In average, each craftsman could only earn Rp
500.000.,- wages every month. This is far from
worthy if we consider from the time they ought to
spend to weave songket, and then the energy that they
waste is not adequate with the wages they receive.
Hence, the weaving culture is no longer an interesting
thing for public.
Generally, the songket craftsmen consist of 40-
year-old housewives, while the teenagers both boys
and girls prefer other jobs such as being self-
employed and work in neighboring country,
Malaysia.
6.3 Batubara Songket Craftsmen
Craftsman is one of the essential elements in the
process of preserving songket culture. They have big
role in the process of songket production and they are
human’s songket resources who are willing to give
energy and time to create a beautiful cultural work,
has ideological, aesthetical, cultural and economical
value.
Their role is sine qua non and fundamental in the
process of conserving the weaving songket culture
but the dedication they give is not in line with the
wages they receive so that economically, they do not
feel a significant impact. This becomes a very
miserable reality amidst the necessities of life is quite
large. It could be concluded that songket craftsmen
are far from welfare community.
Sibarani (2012:193) explained that there are
several things needed to be considered and done to
increase the welfare, such as:
1. Empirical problem or Empirical fact which is
faced by public should be known and analyzed
to get a solution as answer to overcome welfare
problems.
2. Legal Basis or Legal Rule is an important thing
because it could be made as legality to build
connection with several institutions that can give
benefit and improve welfare, the creation of
legal basis such as laws or particular rules which
could be the basis for deciding, conducting, and
helping in improving the welfare. Additionally,
the construction of connection or relation could
be done by several institutions such as
government institutions, private agencies as well
as individuals after the legal basis already exists.
3. The socio-cultural research. This is one thing
that could measure and explain factually about
the conditions, developments, and issues that
are new or old which becomes the challenge of
realizing the welfare of songket weavers. The
result of this study will be used as reference to
develop a new empowerment model to achieve
prosperity.
4. Organizing. It is to make the concept of welfare
improvement based on the finding of research
and planning the cooperation among
institutions.
5. Planning. It is the preparation of plans and
schedule activities systematically started from
the beginning to ending, anyone who will
involve, person in charge, and targets to be
achieved.
6. Implementation is an empowerment activity in
the field that should pay attention properly to the
target of welfare improvement and in the right
target.
The six points above should be considered,
thought, and realized effectively and efficiently so
that the implementation of empowerment activity of
songket craftsmen could be achieved.
The welfare issue of songket weavers is a problem
to solve. For that reason, according to previous
illustration, researcher used local wisdom theory in
solving this problem.
Local wisdom for welfare by Robert Sibarani
(2012) has been divided into some points, those are:
hard work, discipline, education, health, mutual
cooperation, gender management, cultural
preservation and creativity, and environmental care.
Those are expected to produce prosperity which later
by Robert Sibarani (2012) is divided into several parts
as well. The purposes and functions of local wisdom
for welfare are: Prosperity, source of creativity,
cultural industry deposit, motivation of success, and
poverty alleviation. If this is made into diagram, then
it will be understood easier. This is the diagram of
ICOSTEERR 2018 - International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches
1130
Local Wisdom for Welfare
-Hard work,
- Discipline,
- Education,
- Health,
- Mutual Cooperation,
- Gender management,
- Cultural preservation and
creativity,
- Environmental Care.
The Purposes and
Functions of Local Wisdom
- Prosperity,
-
Source of creativity,
-
Cultural industry
deposit,
-
Motivation of success,
-
P
overt
y
alleviation.
local wisdom for welfare below as well as the
purposes and functions:
Figure 5. Local wisdom of welfare
From the diagram above, local wisdom for
welfare are:
1.) Hard work. Hard work is the intensity of work
or working hours for a job. Hard work done by
songket weaver actually is still not maximal because
in weaving songket they place it as a part time activity
so that the received wages are quite minimal. Besides
the timing, apparently, market influence also affects
their activity because when someone orders songket
in a large scale the weavers will pursue the target and
work hard but if there is no order in large scale, they
will do it in their spare time.
Based on the interview, it shows that if they wove
songket with hard work they would get satisfied result
but it usually happens if they get large scale order and
should be finished in "kejar-target” orin hurry"
system.
2.) Discipline. Discipline is an attitude that affects
the activity of business. By discipline, maximal result
would be achieved. Based on observation, the
craftsmen of songket are not bound by the standard
regulations and procedures. Thus, the working hours
and off-work hours are not ruled officially whereas it
is very important thing.
3.) Education.The majority of formal education
passed by songket craftsmen is Senior High School
graduate, but for the development and improvement
of Human’s songket resources, non-formal training is
required which is held by government or private
agencies. These non-formal trainings are expected to
stimulate the creativity and increase knowledge for
them.
4.) Health. Health is also something that should
be noticed. The difficulty in weaving songket causes
the majority weavers feel tired easily, except the age
factor of craftsmen who is about 40 years old. The
traditional looms also become one of the factors
which makes weaving process seems to be very hard
and it impacts on the energy that must be spent.
Moreover, health insurance for songket entrepreneurs
becomes a serious issue that need to be noticed by
government.
5.) Mutual cooperation Mutual cooperation is one
of the local wisdoms in Indonesia which also
becomes the culture of Indonesian society in general.
The activity of songket business was built with
mutual cooperation spirit. This is proved that if there
was a large scale order of songket from someone to
then the entrepreneurs will share the work to other
entrepreneurs so that the target of the order can be
achieved.
This way is one of the gotong royong (mutual
cooperation) cultures that has been innate in the
weaving process, however this tends to be not worth
compared with the results they did specifically unfair
and less transparent in profit sharing. The result is still
focused on individuals so that the financial impact
doesn’t have direct impact to them.
The dominant profit is usually played by tauke
(distributor or even big seller). It would be better if
the orientation of work is to foster the spirit of
tolerance and fairness so that the benefits could be felt
together by each element involved in the process of
weaving songket.
Keeping a good relationship among working
partners by putting respect and tolerance without
reducing the elements of mutual benefit and
empowerment is the most important thing in
maintaining business conduciveness.
1. Gender management
The craftsmen of songket generally are
housewives. The gender management is an important
thing in developing human resources. The existence
of well gender management is expected to help the
weavers to become more tolerant and solid among
them.
The Weaving Craftsmen of Songket Batubara: A Study of Local Wisdom for Welfare
1131
2. Cultural Preservation and Creativity
Cultural preservation and creativity is a socio-
cultural resource that must be developed, revitalized,
modified so that it could get bigger benefits. Songket
is a socio-cultural resource which could be utilized
for the welfare of the owners of the culture. By
conserving weaving songket activity, then the
cultural creativity will still alive but we also want it
has major impact to life of the actors of preservation
and cultural creativity.
3. Environmental care
Environment is important to be protected besides
the environmental conduciveness has a role of
embodying society prosperity. Good social
environment will create good social condition as well.
On the other hand, bad social surroundings will result
bad social surroundings.
Protecting environment is not only maintaining
cleanliness and no littering, but also other things
beyond that, which is the social environment of
society.
People who care about the environment will keep
the reputation of their environment, keep the
conduciveness, embody the new innovations which
could increase the society's welfare, and stimulate
people to involve in protecting the environment and
caring for the surroundings. For instance, the
development of songket business adapted with the
time, without reducing the local elements, the local
wisdom is maintained. It is one way to care for the
social environment of community. It indicates it will
add innovations, simplify and increase the
productivity which can support the welfare of songket
craftsmen.
7 CONCLUSIONS
The songket craftsmen is a human resource
investment which have significant role in preserving
weaving songket culture in Batubara district. This
could be vanished regarding to the minimal received
wages from that activity. And it is considered as a
factor that could erode the culture of weaving songket
in Batubara.
Special attention from social institutions,
government agencies and private institute is
necessary to give programs which aims to increase
knowledge, quality and professionalism of the
songket craftsmen to achieve prosperity in life.
The implementation of local wisdom for welfare
is the best solution to be implemented by the
businessmen and other institutions which has an aim
to improve the welfare of songket craftsmen so that
songket as cultural creativity can still be maintained
and preserved.
REFERENCES
Amrih, Pitoyo. (2008). Ilmu Kearifan Jawa. Yogyakarta,
Pinus Book Publisher.
Bungin Burhan. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.
Jakarta, PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Effendy, Tenas. (2014). Etika Berpakaian Melayu dalam
Busana Melaka. Institut Seni Malaysia Melaka.
Inanna. (2017). Kearifan Lokal Pada Industry Kerajinan
Kain Tenun Sutera Kabupaten Wajo Prosiding
Pluralisme Dalam Ekonomi Dan Pendidikan ISSN
2407-4268.
Marianti, Maria Merry, Dr. dan Istiharini, SE., MM (2013)
Analisa Karakteristik Dan Perilaku Konsumen Tenun
Songket Palembang. Lembaga Penelitian dan
Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. Universitas Katolik
Prahyangan.
Miles, B. Mattew dan A. Michael Huberman. (1994).
Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta, UI Press.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.
Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Narboku,Cholid. (2005). Metodelogi Penelitian. Jakarta,
PT Bumi Aksara.
Sibarani, Robert. (2012). Kearifan Lokal Hakikat, Peran,
dan Metode Tradisi Lisan. Jakata, Asosiasi Tradisi
Lisan.
ICOSTEERR 2018 - International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches
1132