community. This situation is in contrast to the
Pariaman community who live in Medan. Badoncek
tradition is hardly found in Medan. It can be
ascertained that one day in its origin place, it will
also be forgotten by its own community Wempi
Yohanes, (2015).
In badoncek tradition, actually there are some
noble values of local wisdom that has been inherited
by the ancestors. Badoncek tradition has a deep
meaning of life philosophy, that is barek samo
dipikua, jikok ringan samo dijinjiang, which means
life must be mutual help, suffering and happiness
will be shared together. Further, badoncek can be
applied to support government programme (
Mediaterobos.com 2018), (Sulaiman, TK, Rahmat
https://www.kompasiana.com/ 2015),
https://sumbar.antaranews.com/.../2014 Fundraising
from local community aims to repair mosques or
surau, natural disaster, orphans help, repairing
village road, and so forth. Badoncek tradition even
though it is open and tends to compete with each
other, badoncek are not riya acts or show prestige.
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Local Wisdom
Local wisdom is a wisdom that has been agreed
upon by a community and passed down from
generation to generation. Local wisdom can also be
defined as local cultural values that can be used to
regulate people's lives wisely. Local wisdom studies
on local traditions have already been done in various
perspectives Roikhwanphut (2012) discussed about
knowledge and local wisdom of thai people in facing
problems caused by development. She found Thai
traditional communities still have enough knowledge
to rely more on their own knowledge, on their own
ways, and on nature. They live peacefully, help each
other and share with others. These noble values will
continue to be preserved, if possible, combine them
with knowledge that comes from outside. Tambas, et
(2017) found fishing tradition, inherited from
ancestors. Using old equipments, and traditional
ways, the fishing process can be done successfully.
This tradition contains forms of local wisdom such
as sense of solidarity, mutual help, and survival.
2.2 Oral Tradition
Oral tradition, according to Vansina, (1965) are all
oral testimonies concerning the past which are
transmitted from one person to another. Bauer and
Berhneim (in Vansina,1965) has defined oral
tradition is a kind of direct and indirect testimonies.
Direct testimony refers to all verbal testimonies that
are reported statements concerning the past, based
on eyewitness process. It communicates orally.
Indirect testimony refers to nonverbal testimony,
based on transmission process from one generation
to another, it is reported one.
For Pudentia (ed) 2015), it is spoken discourses,
including literary or non-literary discourse system.
Sibarani (2015) said there are three important types
in studying oral tradition, namely (1) forms of oral
tradition concerning the text, context, and co-text,
(2) content of tradition verbal with regard to
meaning and functions, values and norms, and local
wisdom, and (3) revitalization and preservation of
traditions verbal regarding activation or protection,
management and development, and inheritance and
benefit. D.A. Swanson (2008) found a connection
between oral tradition and geological studies. Data
obtained from the oral record about 400 years of
eruptive activity at Kīlauea is almost the same as the
data obtained from modern research. Blackhawk,T
(1990) has defined a kind of teaching using an oral
tradition approach, such as storytelling, is more
effective than writing style. Through this approach,
it is also considered to sharpen students' thinking
and their sense of audience's perspective.
3 METHODOLOGY
This study is a field research. The data was gathered
from Pariaman informants who lived in Pariaman
and Medan city. In collecting data, are used in-
depth interview and focus group discussion methods
(Sugiyono, 2013). Using in-depth interview method,
the researcher interviewed the informants one by one
to get detailed and in-depth information. For focus
group discussion methods, the researcher collected
all the informants, both in Medan and in Pariaman
city separately to discuss about research subject.
Discussion activities were then recorded,
transcripted, and documented. A number of 20 key
informants have been selected, those who really
understand the customs in Pariaman. The findings
obtained from them are based on their own
experience, so empirically considered valid. Their