3.3.2 Society Dependency on Forests
The distance between Tuktuk Siadong and Tomok
Parsaoran villages with forests is about 1-3 Km
making the people live around the forest have a
dependence on forests. Forests as natural resources
become a place of dependence to fulfill basic needs
and survive for generations for people live within or
adjacent to the forest. Several studies show that
forest products contribute significantly to rural
household income, including poverty alleviation.
(Angelsen, 2014
). Several studies (Central Bureau
of Statistics of Samosir Regency, 2010), (Aung,
2014), (Chao, 2012
) highlight the significant
contributions of forest products to the income of
rural households, including the alleviation of
poverty. This has made Tuktuk Siadong and Tomok
Parsaoran villagers become very dependent on local
agricultural produce, trade etc. Due to the very high
dependence of the society on agricultural land, the
societmust also pay attention to the sustainability
aspects of forests to continue to obtain non-timber
and timber forest products such as frankincense,
teak, honey and other local timber.
Utilization of forest products is by a board or
broti to build a house or cottage. At present
Indonesia must be able to see its forest potential
through a different perspective which implies that
the forest does not only provide wood. Intangible
benefits in the form of forest environmental services
provide such as, protection of agricultural land and
live stock from their effects weather or carbon
seques traction, watershed control, social and
cultural benefits obtained from production these
goods and services (Latifa, 2011). Other forest
products utilized by the society are humus,
medicinal plants, firewood, wild pigs, bamboo, and
rattan. The most common types of forest products
are humus and bamboo. Bamboo taken is used to
make crafts such as baskets and souvenirs.
3.3.3 Ethics and Rules
The level of dependence of the people around the
forest is very high on life both in economic and
ecological terms. This will obviously encourage
villagers to keep the forest down until it declines.
Villages have customary restrictions on forests that
allow society to safeguard their forests. Societies are
well aware that logging activities not only damage
the environment, but also affect their acquisition of
forest products and Lake Tabatha hereditary hunting
activity is still done in the forest area, but the society
still pays attention to the applicable environmental
ethics. Ethics that apply is not to hunt all types of
animals that exist in the forest but the main animal
being hunted is the animal that becomes the main
pest for agriculture like wild boar and monkey.
Villagers realize that catching fish around Danu
Toba area by poisoning or using bombs is not the
right way. Societies are aware that it will damage the
environment and will be detrimental to their lives
over a long period of time. Local knowledge owned
by TuktukSiadong and TomokParsaoran villages
indirectly has a positive impact on the existence of
forests and their environment. Many places around
the world where people are very dependent on
ecosystem services for their livelihoods and welfare
are areas of biodiversity in the tropics, where the
livelihood strategies of the poor include several
activities (Johannesen. 2006).
Sardjono argues that studying local wisdom can
give us insight into how indigenous peoples living in
adjacent forest areas treat available forest resources
and be able to act in accordance with their local
knowledge so that forest sustainability can continue
to be utilized until future generations (Sardjono,
2004)
The migrant society in Lake Toba area pays
more attention to the surrounding area, either from
the water quality, the local forest ecology or the
environment. Migrant societies are more aware of
the cleanliness, ecological conditions and social and
economic functions of the local area than the
indigenous peoples. It is the migrants who invite and
give examples for indigenous peoples to pay
attention to the condition and function of Lake Toba
Area from water quality and its forest function.
3.3.4 Techniques and Technology
Most societies have livelihoods as Farmers, Traders
and Guides, both indigenous and immigrant
societies. The techniques undertaken by indigenous
people for the sustainability of the area around Lake
Toba are still relatively low and not satisfactory
because the local society does not really understand
the importance of the sustainability of Lake Toba, in
contrast to the immigrant societies in Tuktuk
Siadong Village and Tomok Parsaoran Village.
Immigrants and the government shut down all
floating net cages in the waters of Lake Toba
although this has left some local people lost their
jobs and livelihoods but it is indispensable to make
Lake Toba one of the largest tourism destinations.
Indigenous people maintain the area of Lake Toba as
reported to the Environment Agency in the event of
contamination such as the existence of black leech