graduates had a good level of knowledge about
immunization.
In addition, a study done by Rahayu
and Wahtini (2017) also supported the results of this
study.
In this study it was found that majority of children
who had complete immunization coverage were 42
infants (58.3%). This study has not yet reached the
target of a Strategic Plan (Renstra) in 2014 amounted
to 90%. The same thing was also reported in the study
(Thaib, 2013) obtained 83.5% of respondents had
complete basic immunization status, 15.5% did not
complete, and 1% never immunized. The reasons of
incomplete basic immunization were parents’ anxiety
and afraid of side effects immunization.
An
evaluation of immunization Hepatitis B in District of
Asahan, found that the reasons for the incompleteness
of immunization were mother did not aware of time
of immunization and children were sick (Harahap,
2008).
Other results obtained from studies by (Tanjung,
2017) at the General Hospital of Dr Haji Adam Malik
Medan showed, that the number of infants who were
fully immunized reached as many as 46 infants
(40.7%) while, 67 infants (59.3%) had incomplete
immunizations. This result is not much different with
a complete basic immunization coverage study done
in Padang in 2013. Basic immunization coverage in
South Sulawesi in 2012 amounted to 88.8%
(Makamban, 2014).
4.2 Basic Immunization Timeliness
In this study, the timeliness of basic immunization
among 72 children aged 12-48 months was
inadequate, where 54 respondents (75%) didn’t
immunize on right time as recommended schedule
and only 18 respondents (25%) immunized on right
time. The timeliness for immunization of Hepatitis B
0 reached to 91.7% which meant the baby received
Hepatitis B 0 at the right time as recommended
schedule. The lowest percentage of immunization
timeliness was Pentavalen 3 as much as 36.1%. The
schedul of hepatitis B 0 immunization is 0 -7 days,
while the Pentavalen 3 vaccine is at age 4 months.
The results of this study was better than the results
from Fauziah (2016) where the accuracy of
immunization in Sri Martuti Clinic, Yogyakarta was
only 63.3%. Based on the data profile of Gedang Sari
Yogyakarta Health Center in 2011, the coverage for
immunizations Hepatitis B 0 was 90.48%, and only
41.7% (25 respondents) were timely in their
immunizations, while 58.3% (35 respondents) were
not. Based on a study by Azizah and Rahmawarti
(2012), it can be concluded that a higher level of
education can increase parent compliance of required
immunization for children and therefore increase
overall immunization coverage and timeliness.
A
research conducted by Irawati (2011), revealed that
the mother's level of knowledge regarding the
timeliness of immunization, in which a poor level of
knowledge results in increasing noncompliance of
immunization schedules.
In addition, this study also found that the roles of
health providers in the immunization of children aged
12-48 months in Puskesmas Amplas were well
executed, but there were only a few officers who went
to the citizens’ houses to remind residents of
immunization schedules. The results were similar to
a study conducted by Supardi (2001) in Bangka
District Health Center which stated that the role
played by health provider will further enhance the
implementation of the immunization program.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The coverage and timeliness of basic immunization
among children aged 12 – 24 months in the working
area of Puskesmas Amplas were 58.3% and 25%
respectively. This basic immunization coverage
consists of receiving one doses of Hepatitis B0
vaccine, one dose of BCG vaccine, four doses of
Polio vaccine, three doses of Pentavalent vaccine and
one dose of Measles vaccine before the child reaches
age one year, while the timeliness of basic
immunization refers to when a child receives each
type of immunization at the right time in line with the
recommended schedule by national immunization
program. In order to attain higher coverage and
timeliness of basic immunization, it is important to
increase knowledge of mothers about immunization
and take advantage of using a reminder for
immunization schedule.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge that the present
research was support by the Directorate of Research
and Community Service of the Directorate General
for Research and Development of the Ministry of
Research, Technology and Higher Education by the
agreement of Funding Research and Community
Service for the Fiscal Year 2018 with the contract
number: 215/UN5.2.3.1/PPM/KP-DRPM/2018