person. According to Strauss and Connerly (2003),
Universal, diverse orientation or UDO has three
dimensions: (a) Diversity of contact. The first is
diversity of contacts which is the level of interest or
inclination of individuals to interact in a social
environment that has diversity of and participation in
cross-cultural activities. This aspect is to see how
individuals are actively willing to interact in diverse
environments. (b) Relativity appreciation. The
second aspect is relativistic appreciation that is to see
the extent to which individuals are able to recognize,
value, and accept the similarities and differences that
exist between humans. This aspect explains how the
level of individual appreciation of the importance of
being aware of the similarities and differences that
exist between diverse groups as well as realizing that
it will have a positive impact on its development. (c)
Comfort with differences. The final aspect of UDO
comfort with differences explains how individuals
feel connected to other human beings because of the
same experience as humans. Individuals can feel
comfortable with the idea of interacting in a culturally
diverse social environment.
1.5 Contact among Groups
Allport (in Pettigrew, 1998) believed that the positive
effects of inter-group contact can only occur when the
following four key conditions are met, namely: (a)
Equivalent status. Allport stressed the importance of
equal status in contact situations between groups.
Each group that interacts must feel that they have
equal status with each other. When the interacting
group has a status difference, contact can actually
produce negative effects (Jackman & Crane, 1986).
The classroom is one place where each interacting
group can feel equal status (Allenby, 2009). (b) Same
purpose. Reducing prejudice through contact requires
an active, goal-oriented effort. When groups that
interact with each other share a common purpose, it
creates a mutual need between the group to achieve
its goals (Pettigrew, 1998). (c) The existence of inter
group cooperation. The accomplishment of the same
goal in the group must occur with the cooperation
between the groups involved in contact (Bettencourt,
1992). (d) There is supported from a higher authority.
The latter condition requires the involvement of other
parties associated with interacting groups. For
example, the existence of social rules or sanctions
will make contacts between groups more widely
accepted and have a greater positive impact
(Pettigrew, 1998)
The first step so that the contacts among inter-
group can have results is by studying other groups.
This learning process can be used to correct a false-
negative view on a particular group, then contact will
be able to reduce prejudice. The occurrence of giving
new information about the other group will make
them capable of encourage the change of attitude to
become more positive. The next step to this learning
process is to change behavior. Optimal group contact
is one of the earliest forms of behavior modification.
Behavior change is regulary on the beginning with a
change of attitude. Creating a new situation where the
individual is required to change his behavior to more
often interact with other group members will further
facilitate the change of attitude. Furthermore, the
generalization of affective bonds. Emotion is very
important in contact between groups. Anxiety at first,
interacting with different groups is common and can
trigger a negative reaction (Islam & Hewstone, 1993).
This anxiety will diminish with more frequent
interactions. Therefore, it is important to pay attention
to the emerging emotions within the individual when
making contact with other groups. The next stage is
the reappraisal in the group. Optimal group contacts
provide a better understanding of both the in group
condition and the out group. Contact not only makes
the individual more familiar with other groups but
also more understanding of his own group by
reflecting on his new knowledge of other groups.
The conclusion is that as Allport states (in Pettigrew
1998) key conditions to be met for positive impacts
are equal status, common goals, inter group
cooperation, and support from higher authorities.
Students in college have same status as students.
Classroom interactions created by authorities such as
lecturers often place students in conditions where
they are required to work together as group
assignments, learning methods by discussion, sports
competitions, interests, talents and many more.
Students will have the same goals as passing an exam,
earning a high score, or winning a competition that is
expected to trigger beneficial contact between
different student groups. Especially for the training
process, the contact process that occurs adjusted to
the requirements needed for contact to be a positive
factor in improving intercultural competence as
measured through universal diverse orientation. The
purpose of this research is to test the effectiveness of
the training of intercultural competence
improvement. To determine its effectiveness, we used
universal diverse orientation measurement in which,
according to the author can be used to see the basic
from looking similarity first, then identify the
difference to avoid conflict.