create a scheme of repairing system that
could solve this problem as long as they are
natural.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From the observations made by the team, there are
five prioritized problems that become obstacles in
creating the community-based tourism in Huta
Ginjang Village, District Palipi, Samosir. These
problems are:
The lack of public awareness of policies on
tourism.
Society that tends to be pessimism about
the development of their tourism.
Village development plans still do not have
a clear concept.
The lack of the villagers’ English language
skills in Huta Ginjang.
System of travel location management is
still using a very simple and unprofessional
system.
Looking at the problems occurred in Huta
Ginjang, there are some solutions that can be drawn
from the highest priority. It is important to do an
understanding of the concepts related public policy
related to tourism in Indonesia. Then it must be
recognized that economic activity in the field of
tourism in Huta Ginjang can not significantly
influence the economic improvement of rural
communities. In this case, such comprehension on
how to do professional tourism business must be
made.
Development plan of Huta Ginjang is still not yet
to place tourism development as priority in rural
development. Observing Act No. 6 Year 2016 about
village, it depends on a mandate that every village in
Indonesia should be developed in accordance with its
characteristics. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) will
be seen about the vision and mission of the
community and village government-related tourism,
so the result of FGD can be used as reference in the
future establishment of village development plans.
The lack of English language skills of the
villagers’ in Huta Ginjang make themselves difficult
to communicate with the foreign tourists. This can be
overcome by conducting English language training
for rural society - at the same time improving the
quality of the people in Huta Ginjang. Then, the
tourism industry requires the attitude and
commitment from all stakeholders. This approach of
case studies in various locations that has successfully
implemented the concept of community-based
tourism will be easier to show how tourism is also
true and promising economic value and has a good
impact on the community in various aspects.
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018, Institute of
Community Services University of Sumatra Utara
made a visit in Huta Tinggi headman’s office. The
presence of a team was to determine the
implementation schedule for a series of community
service. The team was welcomed by the headman of
Huta Ginjang, Mr. Kornel Naibaho. Along with such
warm talks, Mr. Kornel Naibaho revealed that the
villagers in Huta Ginjang had been waiting for a team
that had been previously planned at the time of
proposal submission. The meeting agreed on the
training and seminars in the framework of public
service activities - undertaken by the Institute of
Community Services, University of Sumatra Utara -
which held 3 times in June 2018.
The team implemented Participatory Learning
and Action (PLS) as an effort to increase the capacity
of communities’ to the concept of community-based
tourism. There were several activities that had been
carried out in the framework of PLA implementation,
namely In-class discussion in the mean of seminar -
held on June 5, 2018 at the St. Yosef Catholic Church
of Huta Ginjang. The seminar was attended by 35
participants comprising representatives of the various
groups.
During this seminar, the team enlighted a variety
of materials related to the role of rural communities
in travel industry such as tourism. The team explained
that tourism is one source of foreign exchange, apart
from oil and gas potential. It also has a larger share in
building the economy within its currently slow
growth. The material was submitted to give a stimulus
to the people to look back at the social, cultural,
political, and legal condition around them in order to
establish a tourism business. The people’s sensitivity
in viewing such social, cultural, political, and legal
condition will ease the team to bring up public
awareness.
The following phase of the evaluation team of
servants:
Figure 1: Phase of the evaluation team of servants.